Resection of highly language-eloquent brain lesions based purely on rTMS language mapping without awake surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 158 (12) ◽  
pp. 2265-2275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Ille ◽  
Nico Sollmann ◽  
Vicki M. Butenschoen ◽  
Bernhard Meyer ◽  
Florian Ringel ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi191-vi191
Author(s):  
Sebastian Ille ◽  
Nico Sollmann ◽  
Florian Ringel ◽  
Bernhard Meyer ◽  
Sandro M. Krieg

2017 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. e22
Author(s):  
S. Ille ◽  
N. Sollmann ◽  
V.M. Butenschoen ◽  
B. Meyer ◽  
F. Ringel ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Ille ◽  
Nico Sollmann ◽  
Theresa Hauck ◽  
Stefanie Maurer ◽  
Noriko Tanigawa ◽  
...  

OBJECT Language mapping by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is increasingly used and has already replaced functional MRI (fMRI) in some institutions for preoperative mapping of neurosurgical patients. Yet some factors affect the concordance of both methods with direct cortical stimulation (DCS), most likely by lesions affecting cortical oxygenation levels. Therefore, the impairment of the accuracy of rTMS and fMRI was analyzed and compared with DCS during awake surgery in patients with intraparenchymal lesions. METHODS Language mapping was performed by DCS, rTMS, and fMRI using an object-naming task in 27 patients with left-sided perisylvian lesions, and the induced language errors of each method were assigned to the cortical parcellation system. Subsequently, the receiver operating characteristics were calculated for rTMS and fMRI and compared with DCS as ground truth for regions with (w/) and without (w/o) the lesion in the mapped regions. RESULTS The w/ subgroup revealed a sensitivity of 100% (w/o 100%), a specificity of 8% (w/o 5%), a positive predictive value of 34% (w/o: 53%), and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% (w/o: 100%) for the comparison of rTMS versus DCS. Findings for the comparison of fMRI versus DCS within the w/ subgroup revealed a sensitivity of 32% (w/o: 62%), a specificity of 88% (w/o: 60%), a positive predictive value of 56% (w/o: 62%), and a NPV of 73% (w/o: 60%). CONCLUSIONS Although strengths and weaknesses exist for both rTMS and fMRI, the results show that rTMS is less affected by a brain lesion than fMRI, especially when performing mapping of language-negative cortical regions based on sensitivity and NPV.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi223-vi223
Author(s):  
Andrés Cervio ◽  
Sebastían Giovannini ◽  
Sonia Hasdeu ◽  
Lucía Pertierra ◽  
Blanca Diez

Abstract BACKGROUND Maximal safe resection of brain tumors affecting language areas has been a matter of increasing interest worldwide in the last decades. Functional MRI, tractography, and awake cranial surgery are standard procedures in our department since 2006. The aim of this study was to describe our experience in a series of 58 patients who underwent awake cranial surgery with intraoperative language mapping. METHODS Retrospective study of 58 adult patients who underwent awake surgery for brain tumors between January 2006 and January 2021. Preoperative neuropsychological assessment served as inclusion criteria. Language was evaluated according to the BDAE (Boston diagnostic aphasia examination) and WAB (Western aphasia battery) and strength according to the MRC (Medical Research Council) motor scale in the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 3-months follow up. Functional MRI and tractography depicting white-matter tracts, neuronavigation, cortical and subcortical stimulation were performed in all cases. Conscious sedation was the anesthetic technique (propofol, fentanyl, and NSAIDs). Minimum follow-up was 6 months. FINDINGS The average age was 35 years (16–74). The anatomopathological findings were: low-grade glioma in 75,8% (n = 44), high-grade glioma in 15,6% (n = 9) and others in 8,6% (n = 5). No complications were registered during postoperative course. At the immediate postoperative evaluation 65% of patients presented with speech disturbances but at the 3-months follow up speech recovery was observed in all cases. Only 1 patient remained with moderate aphasia. mRS score at 3- months follow up was ≤ 1 in 96% of patients. Two patients had a persistent moderate hemiparesis. CONCLUSION Tumor resection in awake patients showed to be a safe procedure, and well tolerated by the patients. Preoperative planning of anatomical and functional aspects and intraoperative neurophysiological assessment are the cornerstones for pursuing maximal safe resection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 100772
Author(s):  
D. Colle ◽  
P. Muller ◽  
B. Noens ◽  
E. Robert ◽  
A. Aerts ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria De Martino ◽  
Andrea Talacchi ◽  
Rita Capasso ◽  
Annapina Mazzotta ◽  
Gabriele Miceli

Multilingualism has become a worldwide phenomenon that poses critical issues about the language assessment in patients undergoing awake neurosurgery in eloquent brain areas. The accuracy and sensitivity of multilingual perioperative language assessment procedures is crucial for a number of reasons: they should be appropriate to detect deficits in each of the languages spoken by the patient; they should be suitable to identify language-specific cortical regions; they should ensure that each of the languages of a multilingual patient is tested at an adequate and comparable level of difficulty. In clinical practice, a patient-tailored approach is generally preferred. This is a necessary compromise since it is impossible to predict all the possible language combinations spoken by individuals and thus the availability of standardized testing batteries is a potentially unattainable goal. On the other hand, this leads to high inconsistency in how different neurosurgical teams manage the linguistic features that determine similarity or distance between the languages spoken by the patient and that may constrain the neuroanatomical substrate of each language. The manuscript reviews the perioperative language assessment methodologies adopted in awake surgery studies on multilingual patients with brain tumor published from 1991 to 2021 and addresses the following issues: (1) The language selected for the general neuropsychological assessment of the patient. (2) The procedures adopted to assess the dimensions that may constrain language organization in multilingual speakers: age and type of acquisition, exposure, proficiency, and use of the different languages. (3) The type of preoperative language assessment used for all the languages spoken by the patient. (4) The linguistic tasks selected in the intraoperative setting. The reviewed data show a great heterogeneity in the perioperative clinical workup with multilingual patients. The only exception is the task used during language mapping, as the picture naming task is highly preferred. The review highlights that an objective and accurate description of both the linguistic profile of multilingual patients and the specific properties of the languages under scrutiny can profitably support clinical management and decision making in multilingual awake neurosurgery settings.


2009 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 1291-1299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck-Emmanuel Roux ◽  
Leila Boukhatem ◽  
Louisa Draper ◽  
Oumar Sacko ◽  
Jean-François Démonet

Object A naming task has been used to spare cortical areas involved in language. In the present study, a calculation task was combined with electrostimulation mapping (awake surgery) to spare cortical areas involved in calculation in patients undergoing surgery for brain lesions. The organization of language and calculation areas was analyzed in relation to these surgical data. Methods Twenty patients with brain lesions close to areas possibly involved in calculation (dominant parietal lobe and F2) were prospectively studied over a 4-year period. Four patients had preoperative symptoms of acalculia and therefore were not included in the brain mapping procedure. Results In 16 patients, direct electrostimulation caused calculation interferences in localized small cortical areas (< 2 cm2). Of the 53 calculation interferences found, 23 were independent of language areas, especially those in the inferior left parietal lobule. Various patterns of interference were observed (11 complete acalculia, 5 acalculia with wrong answers, 2 hesitations, and 5 mixed responses), although error patterns were fairly similar across angular, parietal, and frontal stimulation sites. Calculation areas in 4 patients could not be spared for oncological reasons; postoperatively, 3 of these patients showed significant acalculia symptoms. In contrast, none of the patients whose calculation areas were spared had arithmetic difficulties 1 month after surgery. Improvements in acalculia symptoms after surgery were also found in 3 of the 4 patients with preoperative calculation difficulties. Conclusions To limit the risk of personal and professional disturbances caused by acquired anarithmetia in patients undergoing surgery for brain tumors or epilepsy, the authors think it is necessary to use a calculation task during brain mapping, especially when operating in the dominant parietal lobe.


2013 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nico Sollmann ◽  
Thomas Picht ◽  
Jyrki P. Mäkelä ◽  
Bernhard Meyer ◽  
Florian Ringel ◽  
...  

Up to now, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has been used for motor mapping in the vicinity of rolandic brain lesions. Recently, nTMS has also been suggested to be useful in mapping human language areas. The authors describe the case of a left-handed patient with a left-side glioblastoma within the opercular inferior frontal gyrus who presented with severe motor aphasia. Preoperative functional MRI (fMRI) indicated speech dominance of the right hemisphere and did not show any language-related activation in the vicinity of the tumor. Navigated TMS, however, showed a significantly higher rate of induced speech arrests for the left than for the right. Left-side direct cortical stimulation induced clear speech arrests during awake surgery. This case suggests that nTMS may be useful for preoperative speech mapping in tumors affecting the anatomy, vasculature, and brain oxygen levels and therefore impairing fMRI reliability.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. E7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugues Duffau ◽  
Sylvie Moritz-Gasser ◽  
Peggy Gatignol

Object Despite the report of recent experiences of insular surgery in the past decade, there has been no series specifically dedicated to studying functional outcome following resection of insular WHO Grade II gliomas involving the dominant hemisphere, in patients with no or only mild preoperative language deficit. In this article, the authors analyze the contribution of awake mapping for preservation of brain function, especially language, in a homogeneous series of 24 patients who underwent surgery for insular Grade II gliomas within the dominant insular lobe. Methods Twenty-four patients underwent surgery for an insular Grade II glioma involving the dominant hemisphere (22 left, 2 right), revealed by seizures in all but 1 case. The preoperative neurological examination result was normal in 17 patients (71%), whereas 7 patients presented with language disorders detected using an accurate language assessment performed by a speech therapist. All surgeries were performed on awake patients utilizing intra-operative language mapping involving cortical and subcortical stimulation. Results There were no intrasurgical complications or postsurgical sensorimotor deficits. Despite an immediate postoperative language worsening in 12 cases (50%), all patients recovered to a normal status within 3 months, and 6 cases even improved in comparison with their preoperative examination results. The 24 patients returned to normal social and professional lives. Moreover, the surgery had a favorable impact on epilepsy in all but 4 cases (83%). On control MR imaging, 62.5% of resections were total or subtotal. Three patients underwent a second or third awake surgery, with no additional deficit. All but 2 patients (92%) are alive after a mean follow-up of 3 years (range 3–133 months). Conclusions Although insular surgery was long believed to be too risky, the present results show that the rate of permanent deficit, especially dysphasia, following resection of Grade II gliomas involving the dominant insula has been dramatically reduced (none in this patient series), thanks to the systematic use of intraoperative awake mapping, even in cases of repeated operations. Furthermore, patient quality of life may be improved due to a decrease of epilepsy after surgery. Thus, the authors suggest systematically considering resection when an insular Grade II glioma is diagnosed after seizures in a patient with no or mild deficit, even a glioma invading the dominant hemisphere.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document