Effects of light emitting diode (LED) therapy and cold water immersion therapy on exercise-induced muscle damage in rats

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1051-1058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Zingari Camargo ◽  
Cláudia Patrícia Cardoso Martins Siqueira ◽  
Maria Carla Perozim Preti ◽  
Fábio Yuzo Nakamura ◽  
Franciele Mendes de Lima ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 991-999
Author(s):  
Vanessa Batista da Costa Santos ◽  
Julio Cesar Molina Correa ◽  
Priscila Chierotti ◽  
Giovana Stipp Ballarin ◽  
Dari de Oliveira Toginho Filho ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Junaidi JUNAIDI ◽  
Akhmad S. SOBARNA ◽  
Tirto A. APRIYANTO ◽  
Tommy A. APRIANTONO ◽  
Bagus W. WINATA ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abd-Elbasset Abaïdia ◽  
Julien Lamblin ◽  
Barthélémy Delecroix ◽  
Cédric Leduc ◽  
Alan McCall ◽  
...  

Purpose:To compare the effects of cold-water immersion (CWI) and whole-body cryotherapy (WBC) on recovery kinetics after exercise-induced muscle damage.Methods:Ten physically active men performed single-leg hamstring eccentric exercise comprising 5 sets of 15 repetitions. Immediately postexercise, subjects were exposed in a randomized crossover design to CWI (10 min at 10°C) or WBC (3 min at –110°C) recovery. Creatine kinase concentrations, knee-flexor eccentric (60°/s) and posterior lower-limb isometric (60°) strength, single-leg and 2-leg countermovement jumps, muscle soreness, and perception of recovery were measured. The tests were performed before and immediately, 24, 48, and 72 h after exercise.Results:Results showed a very likely moderate effect in favor of CWI for single-leg (effect size [ES] = 0.63; 90% confidence interval [CI] = –0.13 to 1.38) and 2-leg countermovement jump (ES = 0.68; 90% CI = –0.08 to 1.43) 72 h after exercise. Soreness was moderately lower 48 h after exercise after CWI (ES = –0.68; 90% CI = –1.44 to 0.07). Perception of recovery was moderately enhanced 24 h after exercise for CWI (ES = –0.62; 90% CI = –1.38 to 0.13). Trivial and small effects of condition were found for the other outcomes.Conclusions:CWI was more effective than WBC in accelerating recovery kinetics for countermovement-jump performance at 72 h postexercise. CWI also demonstrated lower soreness and higher perceived recovery levels across 24–48 h postexercise.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 937-943 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Vieira ◽  
A. Siqueira ◽  
J. Ferreira-Junior ◽  
J. do Carmo ◽  
J. Durigan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cory L. Butts ◽  
Brendon P. McDermott ◽  
Brian J. Buening ◽  
Jeffrey A. Bonacci ◽  
Matthew S. Ganio ◽  
...  

Exercise conducted in hot, humid environments increases the risk for exertional heat stroke (EHS). The current recommended treatment of EHS is cold-water immersion; however, limitations may require the use of alternative resources such as a cold shower (CS) or dousing with a hose to cool EHS patients.Context: To investigate the cooling effectiveness of a CS after exercise-induced hyperthermia.Objective: Randomized, crossover controlled study.Design: Environmental chamber (temperature = 33.4°C ± 2.1°C; relative humidity = 27.1% ± 1.4%).Setting: Seventeen participants (10 male, 7 female; height = 1.75 ± 0.07 m, body mass = 70.4 ± 8.7 kg, body surface area = 1.85 ± 0.13 m2, age range = 19–35 years) volunteered.Patients or Other Participants: On 2 occasions, participants completed matched-intensity volitional exercise on an ergometer or treadmill to elevate rectal temperature to ≥39°C or until participant fatigue prevented continuation (reaching at least 38.5°C). They were then either treated with a CS (20.8°C ± 0.80°C) or seated in the chamber (control [CON] condition) for 15 minutes.Intervention(s): Rectal temperature, calculated cooling rate, heart rate, and perceptual measures (thermal sensation and perceived muscle pain).Main Outcome Measure(s): The rectal temperature (P = .98), heart rate (P = .85), thermal sensation (P = .69), and muscle pain (P = .31) were not different during exercise for the CS and CON trials (P > .05). Overall, the cooling rate was faster during CS (0.07°C/min ± 0.03°C/min) than during CON (0.04°C/min ± 0.03°C/min; t16 = 2.77, P = .01). Heart-rate changes were greater during CS (45 ± 20 beats per minute) compared with CON (27 ± 10 beats per minute; t16 = 3.32, P = .004). Thermal sensation was reduced to a greater extent with CS than with CON (F3,45 = 41.12, P < .001).Results: Although the CS facilitated cooling rates faster than no treatment, clinicians should continue to advocate for accepted cooling modalities and use CS only if no other validated means of cooling are available.Conclusions:


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document