Shear bond strength and ultrastructural interface analysis of different adhesive systems to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 769-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeliz Guven ◽  
Oya Aktoren
2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Brulat ◽  
Jean-Paul Rocca ◽  
Eric Leforestier ◽  
Gilbert Fiorucci ◽  
Samir Nammour ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 2599-2608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Francois ◽  
Elsa Vennat ◽  
Stéphane Le Goff ◽  
Nathalie Ruscassier ◽  
Jean-Pierre Attal ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 579-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Brulat ◽  
Eric Leforestier ◽  
Jean-Paul Rocca ◽  
Evelyne Darquet-Cerretti ◽  
Marie-France Bertrand

2011 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernando A. Ferreira ◽  
Aline E. Souza-Gabriel ◽  
Yara T. C. Silva-Sousa ◽  
Manoel D. Sousa-Neto ◽  
Ricardo G. Silva

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 547-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
L M G Sierpinsky ◽  
D M Lima ◽  
M S M Candido ◽  
V S Bagnato ◽  
S T Porto-Neto

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Miranda ◽  
Luiz Henrique Maykot Prates ◽  
Ricardo de Souza Vieira ◽  
Maria Cristina Marino Calvo

The aims of this study were to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of four adhesive systems applied to primary dentin and enamel and verify, after SBS testing, the failure mode of the adhesive interface. Sixty extracted sound primary molars were selected and crowns were sectioned in a mesial-distal direction. Specimens were randomly assigned into two groups (adhesion to enamel and adhesion to dentin) and then subdivided into four subgroups according to the adhesive system (n=15): Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP) – Single Bond (SB) – Clearfil SE Bond (and Adper Prompt LPop (APL) – SBS tests were performed and the obtained values were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (p<0.05). The failure mode analysis was performed with a Scanning Electron Microscope (XL-30, Philips). SBS mean values on enamel were [MPa (SD)]: SMP – 27.89 (7.49); SB – 23.92 (8.8); CSB – 24.36 (6.69); APL – 25.96 (4.08); and on dentin: SMP – 17.29 (4.25); SB – 18.2 (8.74); CSB – 16.13 (7.14); APL – 6.04 (3.35). The predominant failure mode was cohesive (primarily of the bonding agent). On enamel SBS was statistically similar for all four adhesives. On dentin SBS of APL was lower than the other tested adhesives.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 519-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Moreno Zanconato-Carvalho ◽  
João Felipe Bruniera ◽  
Natália Spadini de Faria ◽  
Vivian Colucci ◽  
Danielle Cristine Messias

Surface treatment of dentin before the bleaching procedure may affect its permeability and influence the bond strength of restorative materials. This study evaluated the influence of surface treatment before the bleaching on shear bond strength (SBT) of restorative materials to intracoronal dentin. Dentin slabs were subjected to surface treatment: no bleaching (control - CON), no surface treatment + bleaching (HP), 37% phosphoric acid + bleaching (PA) and Er:YAG laser + bleaching (L). After the bleaching procedure, specimens (n=10) were restored with: microhybrid composite resin (MH), flowable composite resin (F), and resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC). The shear test was carried out. ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) showed significant difference for surface treatment and restorative materials (p<0.05). CON presented higher STB and was statistically different from HP (p<0.05). PA and L showed intermediate values and were statistically similar to CON and HP (p>0.05). STB for MH and F were higher than RMGIC (p<0.05), and did not differ from each other (p>0.05). The surface treatments with phosphoric acid and Er:YAG laser before the bleaching procedure provided shear bond strength at the same level of unbleached dentin and the composite resins presented superior bond strength to the intracoronal dentin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document