scholarly journals Impact of preoperative hand grip strength on morbidity following gastric cancer surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 1008-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Sato ◽  
Toru Aoyama ◽  
Tsutomu Hayashi ◽  
Kenki Segami ◽  
Taiichi Kawabe ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 40-40
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Sato ◽  
Toru Aoyama ◽  
Tsutomu Hayashi ◽  
Haruhiko Cho ◽  
Taiichi Kawabe ◽  
...  

40 Background: Skeletal muscle depletion, known as sarcopenia, is characterized by decrease in muscle mass and function. Recent reports demonstrated that sarcopenia was a significant risk factor for complications in colorectal cancer surgery. This study aimed to evaluate impact of preoperative sarcopenia on morbidity in gastric cancer surgery. Methods: Between May 2011 and June 2013, 293 consecutive primary gastric cancer patients who underwent curative surgery were retrospectively examined. All patients received the same perioperative care of enhanced recovery after surgery program. Preoperative skeletal muscle mass was evaluated by bioelectrical impedance analysis and was expressed as skeletal muscle index or SMI (muscle mass/height2) by adjusting absolute muscle mass with height. Preoperative muscle function was measured by hand grip strength (HGS). Each cutoff value was determined as the gender-specific lowest 20% of the distribution of each measurement. Grade 2 or higher morbidity, evaluated by Clavien-Dindo classification, was picked-up from the patient record. Risk factor for morbidity was examined by uni- and multi-variate analyses. Results: Median age (range) was 68 years (37-85 years). Male to female ratio was 192:101. Operative procedure was 122 total, 169 distal, and 2 proximal gastrectomy. Lymphadenectomy was 162 D1+ and 131 D2 including 53 splenectomy. Pathological stage was I in 149, II in 39, III in 91, and IV in 14 patients. Morbidity included 7 pancreatic leakage, 12 anastomotic leakage, 4 intra-abdominal abscess, and others. In total, morbidity was observed in 39 patients (13.3%); 21 in grade 2, 16 in grade 3a, 1 in grade 3b, and 1 in grade 4. No mortality was observed. Univariate analysis showed that male, total gastrectomy, splenectomy, and low HGS were significant risk factor for morbidity. Low SMI was not a risk factor. By multi-variate analysis, low HGS(HR 2.457, p=0.029), male(HR 2.610, p=0.038)and total gastrectomy(HR 2.747, p=0.027)remained significant. Conclusions: Low hand grip strength was one of significant risk factor for morbidity in gastric cancer surgery. Hand grip strength as a surgical risk has a value to be examined in the future prospective studies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 360-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Kubota ◽  
Katsutoshi Shoda ◽  
Hirotaka Konishi ◽  
Kazuma Okamoto ◽  
Eigo Otsuji

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e033267
Author(s):  
Dengfeng Wang ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
Pengxian Tao ◽  
Dan Wang ◽  
Yajing Chen ◽  
...  

IntroductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious life-threatening complication in patients with gastric cancer. Abnormal coagulation function and tumour-related treatment may contribute to the occurrence of VTE. Many guidelines considered that surgical treatment would put patients with cancer at high risk of VTE, so positive prevention is needed. However, there are no studies that have systematically reviewed the postoperative risk and distribution of VTE in patients with gastric cancer. We thus conduct this systematic review to determine the risk of VTE in patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgery and provide some evidence for clinical decision-making.Methods and analysisStudies reporting the incidence of VTE after gastric cancer surgery will be included. Primary studies of randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, population-based surveys and cross-sectional studies are eligible for this review and only studies published in Chinese and English will be included. We will search the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang data from their inception to November 2019. Two reviewers will independently select studies and extract data. The quality of each included study will be assessed with tools corresponding to their study design. Meta-analysis will be used to pool the incidence data from included studies. Heterogeneity of the estimates across studies will be assessed, if necessary, a subgroup analysis will be performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation method is applied to assess the level of evidence obtained from this systematic review.Ethics and disseminationThis proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is based on published data, and thus ethical approval is not required. The results of this review will be sought for publication.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019144562


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document