scholarly journals Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e033267
Author(s):  
Dengfeng Wang ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
Pengxian Tao ◽  
Dan Wang ◽  
Yajing Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Gastric Cancer Surgery ◽  
Positive Prevention

IntroductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious life-threatening complication in patients with gastric cancer. Abnormal coagulation function and tumour-related treatment may contribute to the occurrence of VTE. Many guidelines considered that surgical treatment would put patients with cancer at high risk of VTE, so positive prevention is needed. However, there are no studies that have systematically reviewed the postoperative risk and distribution of VTE in patients with gastric cancer. We thus conduct this systematic review to determine the risk of VTE in patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgery and provide some evidence for clinical decision-making.Methods and analysisStudies reporting the incidence of VTE after gastric cancer surgery will be included. Primary studies of randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, population-based surveys and cross-sectional studies are eligible for this review and only studies published in Chinese and English will be included. We will search the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang data from their inception to November 2019. Two reviewers will independently select studies and extract data. The quality of each included study will be assessed with tools corresponding to their study design. Meta-analysis will be used to pool the incidence data from included studies. Heterogeneity of the estimates across studies will be assessed, if necessary, a subgroup analysis will be performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation method is applied to assess the level of evidence obtained from this systematic review.Ethics and disseminationThis proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is based on published data, and thus ethical approval is not required. The results of this review will be sought for publication.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019144562

scholarly journals Immunonutrition for traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e037014
Author(s):  
Rong Peng ◽  
Hailong Li ◽  
Lijun Yang ◽  
Xinwei Chen ◽  
Linan Zeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Pool Data

IntroductionTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of paediatric trauma death and disability worldwide. The ‘Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (Fourth Edition)’ recommend that nutritional goals should be achieved within 5–7 days of injury. Immune-enhancing nutrition or immunonutrition, referring to the addition of specialised nutrients, including glutamine, alanine, omega-3 fatty acids and nucleotides, to standard nutrition formulas, may improve surgical outcomes in the perioperative period. However, the role of immune-enhancing nutritional supplements for patients with paediatric TBI remains unclear. We will conduct a systematic review to determine the efficacy and safety of immunonutrition for patients with paediatric TBI and provide evidence for clinical decision-making.Methods and analysisStudies reporting immune-enhancing nutrition treatments for patients with paediatric TBI will be included. Outcomes of interest include the length of hospital stay, wound infections, all-cause mortality, non-wound infection, including pneumonia, urinary tract infection and bacteraemia, and the reports adverse events. Duration of follow-up has no restriction. Primary studies consisting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs will be eligible for this review, and only studies published in English will be included. We will search the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from their inception dates to January 2020. We will also search clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for additional information. Two reviewers will independently select studies and extract data. Risk-of-bias will be assessed with tools based on the Cochrane risk-of-bias criteria and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. A meta-analysis will be used to pool data when there are sufficient studies with homogeneity. Heterogeneity of the estimates across studies will be assessed; if necessary, a subgroup analysis will be performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation method will be applied to assess the level of evidence obtained from this systematic review.Ethics and disseminationThe proposed systematic review and meta-analysis will be based on published data, and thus ethical approval is not required. The results of this review will be published.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020154814.

scholarly journals Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in gastric cancer surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 46-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew James Beamish ◽  
David Sheng Yi Chan ◽  
Paul A. Blake ◽  
Alexandra Karran ◽  
Wyn Griffith Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Gastric Cancer Surgery

Sa1170 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Enhanced Recovery Programmes in Gastric Cancer Surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. S-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Beamish ◽  
David S. Chan ◽  
Paul A. Blake ◽  
Alex Karran ◽  
Wyn G. Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Gastric Cancer Surgery

Is concomitant splenectomy necessary in radical gastric cancer surgery? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. e28-e35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuhong Wang ◽  
Tong Dang ◽  
Xianmei Meng ◽  
Kai Li ◽  
Wei Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Gastric Cancer Surgery

scholarly journals A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study of Venous Thromboembolism after Gastric Cancer Surgery (SHISA-1601)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Sachiko Kaida ◽  
Toru Miyake ◽  
Satoshi Murata ◽  
Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi ◽  
Takeshi Tatsuta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Gastric Cancer Surgery ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study ◽  
Prospective Multicenter Observational Study ◽  
D Dimer

Introduction: This study aimed to clarify the frequency and risk factors of intercurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing major curative gastric cancer surgery. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, observational study included patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy at 5 hospitals between June 2016 and May 2018. Patients who were preoperatively administered anticoagulants were excluded. Results: A total of 126 patients were eligible to participate. VTE occurred within 9 days postoperatively in 5 cases (4.0%; 2 symptomatic and 3 asymptomatic). Postoperative day (POD) 1 plasma D-dimer and soluble fibrin (SF) levels were significantly higher in the VTE group than in the non-VTE group. Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis indicated a statistically significant ability of POD 1 D-dimer and SF levels to predict postoperative VTE development after gastrectomy; this finding was reflected by an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 (95% CI 0.92–1.0) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.74–1.0), respectively. Cutoff values of D-dimer (24.6 µg/mL) and SF (64.1 µg/mL) were determined. Intraoperative blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR] 7.86), POD 1 D-dimer ≥24.6 µg/mL (OR 17.35), and POD 1 SF ≥64.1 µg/mL (OR 19.5) were independent predictive factors for postoperative VTE (p < 0.05). Conclusion: VTE occurred in 4.0% patients (1.6% symptomatic and 2.4% asymptomatic) after gastric cancer surgery; however, with an early diagnosis and anticoagulant therapy, no patients experienced progression. Careful observation of patients with a high risk for VTE, including intraoperative blood transfusion and high POD 1 D-dimer or SF levels, would contribute to the early detection of VTE.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document