A systematic review of surgical treatments of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)

Author(s):  
Aristotelis Kalyvas ◽  
Eleftherios Neromyliotis ◽  
Christos Koutsarnakis ◽  
Spyridon Komaitis ◽  
Evangelos Drosos ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aristotelis V. Kalyvas ◽  
Mark Hughes ◽  
Christos Koutsarnakis ◽  
Demetrios Moris ◽  
Faidon Liakos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. E123-E128
Author(s):  
Warren Y. L. Sun ◽  
Noah J. Switzer ◽  
Jerry T. Dang ◽  
Richdeep Gill ◽  
Xinzhe Shi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 380-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Nicholson ◽  
Waleed Brinjikji ◽  
Ivan Radovanovic ◽  
Christopher Alan Hilditch ◽  
Anderson Chun On Tsang ◽  
...  

BackgroundStenting of the intracranial venous sinuses is used as a treatment in certain cases of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Interest in, and experience of, this technique is growing, particularly in recent years. We sought to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of venous stenting in these patients, examining clinical outcomes.MethodsA literature search of venous stenting in IIH patients was performed. Using random-effects meta-analysis, we evaluated the following outcomes: clinical resolution of papilledema; headaches and pulsatile tinnitus; recurrence of symptoms after stenting; and complications.ResultsTwenty articles from 18 different centers were included. In a total of 474 patients. 418 were female (88%). The mean age of the patients was 35, while the mean body mass index (BMI) was 35 kg/m2. Median follow-up was 18 months. The overall rate of improvement in papilloedema was 93.7% (95% CI 90.5% to 96.9%), while the overall rate of improvement or resolution of headache was 79.6% (95% CI 73.3% to 85.9%). Pulsatile tinnitus resolved in 90.3% (95% CI 83.8% to 96.70%), while the overall rate of recurrence of IIH symptoms after stenting was 9.8% (95% CI 6.7% to 13%). The rate of major complications was 1.9% (95% CI 0.07% to 3.1%).ConclusionsVenous sinus stenting in patients with IIH who are refractory to medical therapy appears to have an excellent safety profile and is associated with significant improvements in headaches, pulsatile tinnitus, and papilledema.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1218-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. McCluskey ◽  
R. Doherty‐Allan ◽  
P. McCarron ◽  
A. M. Loftus ◽  
L. V. McCarron ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
AA Al Jishi ◽  
N Zagzoog ◽  
M Alotaibi ◽  
AA Attar ◽  
F Farrokhyar

Background: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a unique disorder that is characterized by an intractable high intracranial pressure. Several interventions have been in clinical practice upon failure of medical management. Yet, none of the available modalities have been evaluated systematically for an CSF diverion procedure. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in order to compare the therapeutic efficacy of the most two common interventions, namely VPS vs. LPS. The complications rate and incidence of shunt revision were assessed. The electronic database from EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane databases, and references of review articles have been used. Results: A total of five retrospective comparative studies had been included out of 724 articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. A 2570 VPS were compared to 1832 LPS with 85% of heterogeneity. Although there was a tendency that suggests better outcome in VPS over LPS but it was not statistically significant [OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.26-3.24]. Similar tendency was observed as well with shunt obstruction. Conclusions: The overall outcomes for stabilizing visual deterioration and improvement of headaches were similar among VPS and LPS. A large prospective multicenteric randomized controlled trial is needed in order to compare effectiveness of VPS and LPS, and also to establish a treatment guideline for IIH.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document