Systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI signs for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 106-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Kwee ◽  
Thomas C. Kwee
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 380-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Nicholson ◽  
Waleed Brinjikji ◽  
Ivan Radovanovic ◽  
Christopher Alan Hilditch ◽  
Anderson Chun On Tsang ◽  
...  

BackgroundStenting of the intracranial venous sinuses is used as a treatment in certain cases of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Interest in, and experience of, this technique is growing, particularly in recent years. We sought to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of venous stenting in these patients, examining clinical outcomes.MethodsA literature search of venous stenting in IIH patients was performed. Using random-effects meta-analysis, we evaluated the following outcomes: clinical resolution of papilledema; headaches and pulsatile tinnitus; recurrence of symptoms after stenting; and complications.ResultsTwenty articles from 18 different centers were included. In a total of 474 patients. 418 were female (88%). The mean age of the patients was 35, while the mean body mass index (BMI) was 35 kg/m2. Median follow-up was 18 months. The overall rate of improvement in papilloedema was 93.7% (95% CI 90.5% to 96.9%), while the overall rate of improvement or resolution of headache was 79.6% (95% CI 73.3% to 85.9%). Pulsatile tinnitus resolved in 90.3% (95% CI 83.8% to 96.70%), while the overall rate of recurrence of IIH symptoms after stenting was 9.8% (95% CI 6.7% to 13%). The rate of major complications was 1.9% (95% CI 0.07% to 3.1%).ConclusionsVenous sinus stenting in patients with IIH who are refractory to medical therapy appears to have an excellent safety profile and is associated with significant improvements in headaches, pulsatile tinnitus, and papilledema.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1218-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. McCluskey ◽  
R. Doherty‐Allan ◽  
P. McCarron ◽  
A. M. Loftus ◽  
L. V. McCarron ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 490-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamidreza Saber ◽  
Whitfield Lewis ◽  
Mahsa Sadeghi ◽  
Gary Rajah ◽  
Sandra Narayanan

Background: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is characterized by an elevated intracranial pressure without any identifiable causative factor such as an intracranial mass. Dural venous sinus stenosis (DVSS) has been suggested to be associated with IIH. Objective: We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to determine clinical outcomes as well as stent survival and stent-adjacent stenosis rates in patients undergoing DVSS for the management of medically refractory IIH. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify prospective or retrospective cohorts or case series of patients with IIH treated with DVSS between 2000 and 2017. Results: A total of 473 patients were included from 24 studies. Headache was present in 429 (91.8%) patients and resolved or improved in 319/413 (77.2%) after the procedure. Headache, papilledema, visual acuity, and tinnitus improved in 256/330 (77.6%), 247/288 (85.8%), 121/172 (70.3%), and 93/110 (84.5%) patients following DVSS at the final follow-up (mean of 18.3 months). In a meta-analysis of 395 patients with available follow-up data on stenting outcome (mean of 18.9 months), the stent survival and stent-adjacent stenosis rates were 84% (95% confidence interval [CI] 79–87%) and 14% (95% CI 11–18%), respectively. The rate of major neurological complications was less than 2%. Conclusion: Stent-adjacent stenosis is an important complication following venous stenting in patients with DVSS and IIH. Further studies are needed to identify determinants of stent-adjacent stenosis and stent nonsurvival.


2016 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aristotelis V. Kalyvas ◽  
Mark Hughes ◽  
Christos Koutsarnakis ◽  
Demetrios Moris ◽  
Faidon Liakos ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Agustín Godoy ◽  
Rafael A. Núñez-Patiño ◽  
Andres Zorrilla-Vaca ◽  
Wendy C. Ziai ◽  
J. Claude Hemphill

Author(s):  
Aristotelis Kalyvas ◽  
Eleftherios Neromyliotis ◽  
Christos Koutsarnakis ◽  
Spyridon Komaitis ◽  
Evangelos Drosos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. E123-E128
Author(s):  
Warren Y. L. Sun ◽  
Noah J. Switzer ◽  
Jerry T. Dang ◽  
Richdeep Gill ◽  
Xinzhe Shi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document