scholarly journals Using Value-at-Risk to reconcile limited liability and the moral-hazard problem

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanda Tulli ◽  
Gerd Weinrich
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung-Hsi Huang ◽  
Ching-Ping Wang

Abstract Most existing researches on optimal reinsurance contract are based on an insurer’s viewpoint. However, the optimal reinsurance contract for an insurer is not necessarily to be optimal for a reinsurer. Hence, this study aims to develop the optimal reciprocal reinsurance which satisfies the benefits of both the insurer and reinsurer. Additionally, due to legislative restriction or risk management requirement, the wealth of insurer and reinsurer are frequently imposed upon a VaR (Value-at-Risk) or TVaR (Tail Value-at-Risk) constraint. Therefore, this study develops an optimal reciprocal reinsurance contract which maximizes the common benefits (evaluated by weighted addition of expected utilities) of the insurer and reinsurer subject to their VaR or TVaR constraints. Furthermore, for avoiding moral hazard problem, the developed contract is additionally restricted to a regular form or incentive compatibility (both indemnity schedule and retained loss schedule are continuously nondecreasing).


2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 536-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Carroll

We consider a moral hazard problem where the principal is uncertain as to what the agent can and cannot do: she knows some actions available to the agent, but other, unknown actions may also exist. The principal demands robustness, evaluating possible contracts by their worst-case performance, over unknown actions the agent might potentially take. The model assumes risk-neutrality and limited liability, and no other functional form assumptions. Very generally, the optimal contract is linear. The model thus offers a new explanation for linear contracts in practice. It also introduces a flexible modeling approach for moral hazard under nonquantifiable uncertainty. (JEL D81, D82, D86)


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard DeFusco ◽  
Paul Shoemaker ◽  
Nancy Stara

<span>Accounting firms may choose to organize either as Limited Liability Companies (LLC) or as Limited Liability Partnerships (LLP) to eliminate joint and several liability for their partners. However, before firms consider adopting either new entity form to limit tortuous liability, the moral hazard problem associated with these entity choices should be evaluated. This article examines the issue of accountant liability and offers suggestions to reduce moral hazard while still protecting the accountant from personal liability.</span>


2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 259-267
Author(s):  
Frank Schuhmacher ◽  
Benjamin R. Auer
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  

Controlling ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 425-426
Author(s):  
Mischa Seiter ◽  
Sven Eckert
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  

CFA Digest ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-78
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Latta

Author(s):  
Arndt P. Funken ◽  
Alexander Obeid
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document