scholarly journals Correction to: Semi-automatic segmentation from intrinsically-registered 18F-FDG–PET/MRI for treatment response assessment in a breast cancer cohort: comparison to manual DCE–MRI

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-330
Author(s):  
Maren Marie Sjaastad Andreassen ◽  
Pål Erik Goa ◽  
Torill Eidhammer Sjøbakk ◽  
Roja Hedayati ◽  
Hans Petter Eikesdal ◽  
...  

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in Fig. 6.

2014 ◽  
Vol 83 (10) ◽  
pp. 1925-1933 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Groheux ◽  
Elif Hindié ◽  
Michel Marty ◽  
Marc Espié ◽  
Domenico Rubello ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. e226511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice Giroulet ◽  
Flavian Tabotta ◽  
Anastasia Pomoni ◽  
John Prior

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Noémie Moreau ◽  
Caroline Rousseau ◽  
Constance Fourcade ◽  
Gianmarco Santini ◽  
Aislinn Brennan ◽  
...  

Metastatic breast cancer patients receive lifelong medication and are regularly monitored for disease progression. The aim of this work was to (1) propose networks to segment breast cancer metastatic lesions on longitudinal whole-body PET/CT and (2) extract imaging biomarkers from the segmentations and evaluate their potential to determine treatment response. Baseline and follow-up PET/CT images of 60 patients from the EPICUREseinmeta study were used to train two deep-learning models to segment breast cancer metastatic lesions: One for baseline images and one for follow-up images. From the automatic segmentations, four imaging biomarkers were computed and evaluated: SULpeak, Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG), PET Bone Index (PBI) and PET Liver Index (PLI). The first network obtained a mean Dice score of 0.66 on baseline acquisitions. The second network obtained a mean Dice score of 0.58 on follow-up acquisitions. SULpeak, with a 32% decrease between baseline and follow-up, was the biomarker best able to assess patients’ response (sensitivity 87%, specificity 87%), followed by TLG (43% decrease, sensitivity 73%, specificity 81%) and PBI (8% decrease, sensitivity 69%, specificity 69%). Our networks constitute promising tools for the automatic segmentation of lesions in patients with metastatic breast cancer allowing treatment response assessment with several biomarkers.


2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. e185-e187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Treglia ◽  
Silvia Taralli ◽  
Fabio Maggi ◽  
Antonella Coli ◽  
Libero Lauriola ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 177-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlotta Dolci ◽  
Chiara Spadavecchia ◽  
Cinzia Crivellaro ◽  
Elena De Ponti ◽  
Sergio Todde ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 706
Author(s):  
Kota Yokoyama ◽  
Junichi Tsuchiya ◽  
Ukihide Tateishi

The present study was designed to assess the additional value of 2-deoxy-2[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the treatment response assessment of multiple myeloma (MM). We performed a meta-analysis of all available studies to compare the detectability of treatment response of [18F]FDG PET/CT and MRI in treated MM. We defined detecting a good therapeutic effect as positive, and residual disease as negative. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated the positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR), and made summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) using hierarchical regression models. The pooled analysis included six studies that comprised 278 patients. The respective performance characteristics (95% confidence interval (CI)) of [18F]FDG PET/CT and MRI were as follows: sensitivity of 80% (56% to 94%) and 25% (19% to 31%); specificity of 58% (44% to 71%) and 83% (71% to 91%); diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 6.0 (3.0–12.0) and 1.7 (0.7–2.7); positive LR of 1.8 (1.3–2.4) and 1.4 (0.7–2.7); and negative LR of 0.33 (0.21–0.53) and 0.81 (0.62–1.1). In the respective SROC curves, the area under the curve was 0.77 (SE, 0.038) and 0.59 (SE, 0.079) and the Q* index was 0.71 and 0.57. Compared with MRI, [18F]FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity and better DOR and SROC curves. Compared with MRI, [18F]FDG PET/CT had greater ability to detect the treatment assessment of MM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document