Forecasting the abnormal events at well drilling with machine learning

Author(s):  
Ekaterina Gurina ◽  
Nikita Klyuchnikov ◽  
Ksenia Antipova ◽  
Dmitry Koroteev
Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1293
Author(s):  
Shamil Islamov ◽  
Alexey Grigoriev ◽  
Ilia Beloglazov ◽  
Sergey Savchenkov ◽  
Ove Tobias Gudmestad

This article takes an approach to creating a machine learning model for the oil and gas industry. This task is dedicated to the most up-to-date issues of machine learning and artificial intelligence. One of the goals of this research was to build a model to predict the possible risks arising in the process of drilling wells. Drilling of wells for oil and gas production is a highly complex and expensive part of reservoir development. Thus, together with injury prevention, there is a goal to save cost expenditures on downtime and repair of drilling equipment. Nowadays, companies have begun to look for ways to improve the efficiency of drilling and minimize non-production time with the help of new technologies. To support decisions in a narrow time frame, it is valuable to have an early warning system. Such a decision support system will help an engineer to intervene in the drilling process and prevent high expenses of unproductive time and equipment repair due to a problem. This work describes a comparison of machine learning algorithms for anomaly detection during well drilling. In particular, machine learning algorithms will make it possible to make decisions when determining the geometry of the grid of wells—the nature of the relative position of production and injection wells at the production facility. Development systems are most often subdivided into the following: placement of wells along a symmetric grid, and placement of wells along a non-symmetric grid (mainly in rows). The tested models classify drilling problems based on historical data from previously drilled wells. To validate anomaly detection algorithms, we used historical logs of drilling problems for 67 wells at a large brownfield in Siberia, Russia. Wells with problems were selected and analyzed. It should be noted that out of the 67 wells, 20 wells were drilled without expenses for unproductive time. The experiential results illustrate that a model based on gradient boosting can classify the complications in the drilling process better than other models.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Praveen Myageri ◽  
Praveena A C ◽  
Santhosh S ◽  
Raghu B G ◽  
Chethana H T

Author(s):  
B.G. Ganiev ◽  
◽  
А.V. Nasybullin ◽  
Ram.Z. Sattarov ◽  
V.S. Timofeev ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Praveen Myageri ◽  
Praveena A C ◽  
Santhosh S ◽  
Raghu B G ◽  
Chethana H T

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrthe Faber

Abstract Gilead et al. state that abstraction supports mental travel, and that mental travel critically relies on abstraction. I propose an important addition to this theoretical framework, namely that mental travel might also support abstraction. Specifically, I argue that spontaneous mental travel (mind wandering), much like data augmentation in machine learning, provides variability in mental content and context necessary for abstraction.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed J. Zaki ◽  
Wagner Meira, Jr
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Peter Deisenroth ◽  
A. Aldo Faisal ◽  
Cheng Soon Ong
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Lorenza Saitta ◽  
Attilio Giordana ◽  
Antoine Cornuejols

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document