Parameters of phosphene-inducing electric stimulation of the cat visual cortex via implanted surface and intracortical electrodes

2008 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Kh. Baziyan ◽  
S. A. Gordeev ◽  
M. E. Ivanova ◽  
V. V. Ortmann
1985 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 365-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuji Kasamatsu ◽  
Kazushige Watabe ◽  
Paul Heggelund ◽  
Erling Schöller

2016 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belal Neyazi ◽  
Kerstin Schwabe ◽  
Mesbah Alam ◽  
Joachim K. Krauss ◽  
Makoto Nakamura

1998 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 462-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Ahmed ◽  
J. C. Anderson ◽  
R. J. Douglas ◽  
K. A. Martin ◽  
D. Whitteridge

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 3381-3385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Crair ◽  
Edward S. Ruthazer ◽  
Deda C. Gillespie ◽  
Michael P. Stryker

Crair, Michael C., Edward S. Ruthazer, Deda C. Gillespie, and Michael P. Stryker. Ocular dominance peaks at pinwheel center singularities of the orientation map in cat visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 3381–3385, 1997. In the primary visual cortex of monkey and cat, ocular dominance and orientation are represented continuously and simultaneously, so that most neighboring neurons respond optimally to visual stimulation of the same eye and orientation. Maps of stimulus orientation are punctuated by singularities referred to as “pinwheel centers,” around which all orientations are represented. Given that the orientation map is mostly continuous, orientation singularities are a mathematical necessity unless the map consists of perfectly parallel rows, and there is no evidence that the singularities play a role in normal function or development. We report here that in cats there is a strong tendency for peaks of ocular dominance to lie on the pinwheel center singularities of the orientation map. This relationship predicts but is not predicted by the tendencies, previously reported, for pinwheels to lie near the center lines of ocular dominance bands and for iso-orientation bands to cross ocular dominance boundaries at right angles. The coincidence of ocular dominance peaks with orientation singularities is likely to reflect a strong underlying functional link between the two visual cortical maps.


2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 2000-2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soroush Niketeghad ◽  
Abirami Muralidharan ◽  
Uday Patel ◽  
Jessy D. Dorn ◽  
Laura Bonelli ◽  
...  

Stimulation of primary visual cortices has the potential to restore some degree of vision to blind individuals. Developing safe and reliable visual cortical prostheses requires assessment of the long-term stability, feasibility, and safety of generating stimulation-evoked perceptions.A NeuroPace responsive neurostimulation system was implanted in a blind individual with an 8-year history of bare light perception, and stimulation-evoked phosphenes were evaluated over 19 months (41 test sessions). Electrical stimulation was delivered via two four-contact subdural electrode strips implanted over the right medial occipital cortex. Current and charge thresholds for eliciting visual perception (phosphenes) were measured, as were the shape, size, location, and intensity of the phosphenes. Adverse events were also assessed.Stimulation of all contacts resulted in phosphene perception. Phosphenes appeared completely or partially in the left hemifield. Stimulation of the electrodes below the calcarine sulcus elicited phosphenes in the superior hemifield and vice versa. Changing the stimulation parameters of frequency, pulse width, and burst duration affected current thresholds for eliciting phosphenes, and increasing the amplitude or frequency of stimulation resulted in brighter perceptions. While stimulation thresholds decreased between an average of 5% and 12% after 19 months, spatial mapping of phosphenes remained consistent over time. Although no serious adverse events were observed, the subject experienced mild headaches and dizziness in three instances, symptoms that did not persist for more than a few hours and for which no clinical intervention was required.Using an off-the-shelf neurostimulator, the authors were able to reliably generate phosphenes in different areas of the visual field over 19 months with no serious adverse events, providing preliminary proof of feasibility and safety to proceed with visual epicortical prosthetic clinical trials. Moreover, they systematically explored the relationship between stimulation parameters and phosphene thresholds and discovered the direct relation of perception thresholds based on primary visual cortex (V1) neuronal population excitation thresholds.


Toxins ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 303
Author(s):  
Alessandro Picelli ◽  
Mirko Filippetti ◽  
Giorgio Sandrini ◽  
Cristina Tassorelli ◽  
Roberto De Icco ◽  
...  

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) represents a first-line treatment for spasticity, a common disabling consequence of many neurological diseases. Electrical stimulation of motor nerve endings has been reported to boost the effect of BoNT-A. To date, a wide range of stimulation protocols has been proposed in the literature. We conducted a systematic review of current literature on the protocols of electrical stimulation to boost the effect of BoNT-A injection in patients with spasticity. A systematic search using the MeSH terms “electric stimulation”, “muscle spasticity” and “botulinum toxins” and strings “electric stimulation [mh] OR electrical stimulation AND muscle spasticity [mh] OR spasticity AND botulinum toxins [mh] OR botulinum toxin type A” was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, PEDro and Cochrane library electronic databases. Full-text articles written in English and published from database inception to March 2021 were included. Data on patient characteristics, electrical stimulation protocols and outcome measures were collected. This systematic review provides a complete overview of current literature on the role of electrical stimulation to boost the effect of BoNT-A injection for spasticity, together with a critical discussion on its rationale based on the neurobiology of BoNT-A uptake.


Neuron ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 263-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilan Lampl ◽  
Jeffrey S. Anderson ◽  
Deda C. Gillespie ◽  
David Ferster

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document