High-resolution melting analysis for rapid screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Spanish mutations

2008 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 405-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inmaculada de Juan ◽  
Eva Esteban ◽  
Sarai Palanca ◽  
Eva Barragán ◽  
Pascual Bolufer
2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (14) ◽  
pp. 2434-2437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manabu Funayama ◽  
Hiroyuki Tomiyama ◽  
Ruey-Meei Wu ◽  
Kotaro Ogaki ◽  
Hiroyo Yoshino ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 982-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim De Leeneer ◽  
Ilse Coene ◽  
Bruce Poppe ◽  
Anne De Paepe ◽  
Kathleen Claes

Abstract Background: High-resolution melting is an emerging technique for detection of nucleic acid sequence variations. Developments in instrumentation and saturating intercalating dyes have made accurate high-resolution melting analysis possible and created opportunities to use this technology in diagnostic settings. We evaluated 2 high-resolution melting instruments for screening BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Methods: To cover the complete coding region and splice sites, we designed 112 PCR amplicons (136–435 bp), amplifiable with a single PCR program. LCGreen® Plus was used as the intercalating dye. High-resolution melting analysis was performed on the 96-well Lightscanner™ (Idaho Technology Inc.) and the 96-well LightCycler® 480 (Roche) instruments. We evaluated sensitivity by analyzing 212 positive controls scattered over almost all amplicons and specificity by blind screening of 22 patients for BRCA1 and BRCA2. In total, we scanned 3521 fragments. Results: All 212 known heterozygous sequence variants were detected on the Lightscanner by analysis on normal sensitivity setting. On the LightCycler 480, the standard instrument sensitivity setting of 0.3 had to be increased to 0.7 to detect all variants, decreasing the specificity to 95.9% (vs 98.7% for the Lightscanner). Conclusions: Previously, we screened BRCA1/2 by direct sequencing of the large exon 11 and denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis (DGGE) for all other coding exons. Since the introduction of high-resolution melting, our turnaround time has been one third of that with direct sequencing and DGGE, as post-PCR handling is no longer required and the software allows fast analyses. High-resolution melting is a rapid, cost-efficient, sensitive method simple enough to be readily implemented in a diagnostic laboratory.


Author(s):  
Bertrand Chesneau ◽  
Aurélie Plancke ◽  
Guillaume Rolland ◽  
Nicolas Chassaing ◽  
Christine Coubes ◽  
...  

AbstractMarfan syndrome (MFS) is a heritable connective tissue disorder (HCTD) caused by pathogenic variants in FBN1 that frequently occur de novo. Although individuals with somatogonadal mosaicisms have been reported with respect to MFS and other HCTD, the overall frequency of parental mosaicism in this pathology is unknown. In an attempt to estimate this frequency, we reviewed all the 333 patients with a disease-causing variant in FBN1. We then used direct sequencing, combined with High Resolution Melting Analysis, to detect mosaicism in their parents, complemented by NGS when a mosaicism was objectivized. We found that (1) the number of apparently de novo events is much higher than the classically admitted number (around 50% of patients and not 25% as expected for FBN1) and (2) around 5% of the FBN1 disease-causing variants were not actually de novo as anticipated, but inherited in a context of somatogonadal mosaicisms revealed in parents from three families. High Resolution Melting Analysis and NGS were more efficient at detecting and evaluating the level of mosaicism compared to direct Sanger sequencing. We also investigated individuals with a causal variant in another gene identified through our “aortic diseases genes” NGS panel and report, for the first time, on an individual with a somatogonadal mosaicism in COL5A1. Our study shows that parental mosaicism is not that rare in Marfan syndrome and should be investigated with appropriate methods given its implications in patient’s management.


2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 714-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matej Bezdicek ◽  
Martina Lengerova ◽  
Dita Ricna ◽  
Barbora Weinbergerova ◽  
Iva Kocmanova ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document