Updated efficacy of adjuvant epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by taxanes versus carboplatin plus taxanes in early triple-negative breast cancer in phase 2 trial: 8.1-year median follow-up

Author(s):  
Fangchao Zheng ◽  
Feng Du ◽  
Wenmiao Wang ◽  
Yongsheng Wang ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1011-1011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaveta Vinayak ◽  
Sara M. Tolaney ◽  
Lee Steven Schwartzberg ◽  
Monica M. Mita ◽  
Georgia Anne-Lee McCann ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A365-A365
Author(s):  
Aaron Stevens ◽  
Joyce O’Shaughnessy ◽  
Subing Cao ◽  
Jessica Sorrentino ◽  
Janet Horton ◽  
...  

BackgroundTrilaciclib is an intravenous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor approved to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (myeloprotection). In a randomized, open-label phase 2 trial in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), adding trilaciclib prior to gemcitabine/carboplatin (GCb) increased overall survival in both PD-L1–positive and –negative populations versus GCb alone.1 2 We investigated potential immune mechanisms of anti-tumor efficacy among patients who received trilaciclib plus GCb.MethodsPeripheral blood was collected prior to and on treatment for flow cytometric analysis, and total RNA isolated from diagnostic tumor biopsies for sequencing. Differential gene expression analysis between responders and non-responders was based on negative binomial distribution and related pathways identified by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis. Tumor inflammation signatures and deconvolution-based approaches were used to assess the tumor immune microenvironment. PD-L1 expression was considered positive if ≥1% of the total tumor area contained PD-L1–labelled immune cells (Ventana SP142 assay). Patients were defined as responders (confirmed complete or partial response) or non-responders (stable or progressive disease) according to RECIST criteria.ResultsOf 68 patients who received trilaciclib prior to GCb, tumor response status and RNA sequencing data were available for 51 patients, comprising 24 responders and 27 non-responders. Tumors from responders had 253 differentially expressed genes compared with non-responders. Analysis of immune gene signatures revealed a higher T-cell exhaustion score at baseline among responders versus non-responders (P=0.044).Among patients with PD-L1–positive tumors, responders had a greater peripheral immune response at baseline compared with non-responders, including more T cells (P=0.037; particularly memory CD8 T cells [P=0.042]), and a trend toward fewer myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Additionally, tumors from responders had more dendritic cells (P=0.044) and a trend toward enriched tumor inflammation signatures compared with non-responders.By contrast, among patients with PD-L1–negative tumors, responders had similar peripheral immune populations at baseline compared with PD-L1–negative non-responders, but fewer MDSCs (P=0.016), and a trend toward increased T-cell numbers after two cycles of trilaciclib plus GCb.Responders with both PD-L1–positive and –negative tumors had increased numbers of naïve CD8 T cells after two treatment cycles compared with non-responders.ConclusionsThe data suggest that adding trilaciclib prior to GCb enhances antitumor efficacy by modulating the composition of immune cell subsets. The impact of trilaciclib on changes to the tumor-infiltrating immune response is being further investigated in a phase 3 trial in patients with mTNBC (NCT04799249).AcknowledgementsFlow cytometry and RNA sequencing analyses were performed by Covance, Inc., and Q2 Laboratory Solutions, respectively.Trial Registration www.clinicaltrials.govNCT02978716ReferencesTan AR, Wright GS, Thummala AR, Danso MA, Popovic L, Pluard TJ, Han HS, Vojnović Ž, Vasev N, Ma L, Richards DA, Wilks ST, Milenković D, Yang Z, Antal JM, Morris SR, O’Shaughnessy J. Trilaciclib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019;20(11):1587–1601.O’Shaughnessy J, Wright GS, Thummala AR, Danso MA, Popovic L, Pluard TJ, Han HS, Vojnović Ž, Vasev N, Ma L, Richards DA, Wilks ST, Milenković D, Xiao J, Sorrentino JA, Horton J, Tan AR. Abstract PD1-06: trilaciclib improves overall survival when given with gemcitabine/carboplatin in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: final analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial. Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Supplement):PD1-06.Ethics ApprovalThe study protocol and all associated amendments and study-related materials were approved by the institutional review board or independent ethics committee of each investigational site.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1587-1601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoinette R Tan ◽  
Gail S Wright ◽  
Anu R Thummala ◽  
Michael A Danso ◽  
Lazar Popovic ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (21) ◽  
pp. 6905-6913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Finn ◽  
Carmelo Bengala ◽  
Nuhad Ibrahim ◽  
Henri Roché ◽  
Joseph Sparano ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 767-781
Author(s):  
Manikandan Dhanushkodi ◽  
Velusamy Sridevi ◽  
Viswanathan Shanta ◽  
Ranganathan Rama ◽  
Rajaraman Swaminathan ◽  
...  

PURPOSE There are sparse data on the outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). This report is on the prognostic factors and long-term outcome from Cancer Institute, Chennai. METHODS This is an analysis of untreated patients with LABC (stages IIIA-C) who were treated from January 2006 to December 2013. RESULTS Of the 4,577 patients with breast cancer who were treated, 2,137 patients (47%) with LABC were included for analysis. The median follow-up was 75 months (range, 1-170 months), and 2.3% (n = 49) were lost to follow-up at 5 years. The initial treatment was neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (NACR) (77%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (15%), or others (8%). Patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a pathologic complete response (PCR) of 41%. The 10-year overall survival was for stage IIIA (65.1%), stage IIIB (41.2%), and stage IIIC (26.7%). Recurrence of cancer was observed in 27% of patients (local 13% and distant 87%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a tumor size > 10 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.62 to 2.98; P = .001), hormone receptor negativity (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.72; P = .001), treatment modality (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.73; P = .001), lack of PCR (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.85 to 3.02; P = .001), and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.44; P = .001) had decreased overall survival. CONCLUSION NACR was feasible in inoperable LABC and gave satisfactory long-term survival. PCR was significantly higher in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The tumor size > 10 cm was significantly associated with inferior survival. However, this report acknowledges the limitations inherent in experience of management of LABC from a single center.


Author(s):  
Leisha A Emens ◽  
Margaret E. Gatti-Mays ◽  
Joyce O’Shaughnessy ◽  
Luc Dirix ◽  
Giovanni Faggioni ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document