scholarly journals Sleep deficiency and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women in the California teachers study (CTS)

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 1115-1128
Author(s):  
S. Hurley ◽  
D. Goldberg ◽  
J. Von Behren ◽  
J. Clague DeHart ◽  
S. Wang ◽  
...  
Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 126 (21) ◽  
pp. 4687-4696
Author(s):  
Eun Young Kim ◽  
Yoosoo Chang ◽  
Jiin Ahn ◽  
Ji‐Sup Yun ◽  
Yong Lai Park ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 150 (3) ◽  
pp. 643-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Rosner ◽  
A. Heather Eliassen ◽  
Adetunji T. Toriola ◽  
Susan E. Hankinson ◽  
Walter C. Willett ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
H-H. Sherry Chow ◽  
Linda L. Garland ◽  
Brandy M. Heckman-Stoddard ◽  
Chiu-Hsieh Hsu ◽  
Valerie D. Butler ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 660-660
Author(s):  
Timothy J Key ◽  
Angela Balkwill ◽  
Kathryn E Bradbury ◽  
Gillian K Reeves ◽  
Ai Seon Kuan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuyu Sun ◽  
Weihong Xie ◽  
Yanli Wang ◽  
Feifei Chong ◽  
Mengmeng Song ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Alcohol intake has been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer. However, the dose-response analysis of different alcoholic beverages (spirits, wine and beer) is not clear. Our meta-analysis aims to provide a dose-response estimation between different alcohols and breast cancer risk. Methods Search of PubMed and Web of Science and manual searches were conducted up to 1 December 2018, and summary relative risks (RRs) and attributable risk percentage (ARP) for alcohol intake on the development of breast cancer were calculated. Dose-response meta-analysis modeled relationships between drinking type and breast cancer risk. Sources of heterogeneity were explored, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of findings. Results In total, 22 cohort studies and 45,350 breast cancer cases were included. Current drinkers for ER+ had an increased risk compared with never drinkers. In dose-response analysis, there was a statistically significant linear trend with breast cancer risk increasing gradually by total alcohol and wine dose: when adding 10 g per day, the risk increased by 10.5% (RR = 1.10, 95%CI = 1.08–1.13) in total alcohol and 8.9% (RR = 1.08, 95%CI = 1.04–1.14) in wine. For postmenopausal women, the risk increases by 11.1% (RR = 1.11, 95%CI = 1.09–1.13) with every 10 g of total alcohol increase. Furthermore, the breast cancer alcohol-attributed percentage is higher in Europe than in North America and Asia. Conclusions The effect of drinking on the incidence of breast cancer is mainly manifested in ER+ breast cancer. Quantitative analysis showed total drinking had a significant risk for breast cancer, especially for postmenopausal women. However, for different alcohols, just wine intake has the similar results.


Author(s):  
Jae Won Park ◽  
Kyungdo Han ◽  
Dong Wook Shin ◽  
Yohwan Yeo ◽  
Ji Won Chang ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clémentine LeMarchand* ◽  
Séverine Tual ◽  
Mathilde Boulanger ◽  
Noémie Levêque-Morlais ◽  
Stéphanie Perrier ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA6-LBA6 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. Chlebowski ◽  
K. C. Johnson ◽  
C. Kooperberg ◽  
A. Hubbell ◽  
D. Lane ◽  
...  

LBA6 Background: Calcium (Ca) and vitamin D (D) have been associated with reduced breast cancer and breast density in observational studies. Randomized trials have not evaluated Ca/D supplementation for breast cancer prevention. Methods: We randomized 36,282 postmenopausal women without prior breast cancer from 40 WHI centers to 1000 mg of elemental calcium as calcium carbonate and 400 IU of vitamin D3 (N = 18,176) daily or matching placebo (N = 18,106); 54% were also randomized one year previously to hormone therapy (HT) or placebo; conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate or CEE alone (the latter for those with prior hysterectomy). Ca/D effects on hip fracture and colorectal cancer have been reported (NEJM 2006). We report here pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer as a secondary outcome of the Ca/D trial. Baseline serum 25(OH) D levels (in 1787 women) and serial joint symptoms (pain/stiffness and hand/feet swelling 0–3 scale, in a 6% sample) were also assessed. Results: Breast cancer incidence did not differ between Ca/D and placebo randomization groups (528 and 546 cases in Ca/D and placebo; hazard ratio 0.96; 95 percent confidence interval (CI), 0.85, 1.09). While SEER stage and abnormal mammogram frequency were similar between groups, breast cancers were smaller in the Ca/D group (1.54 cm (1.23), mean (SD) versus 1.71 (1.29), P = 0.05). Total vitamin D baseline intake was associated with lower breast cancer risk in the placebo group. Baseline vitamin D (nmol per liter) deficiency was common (≥30, sufficient (n = 266), 16 ≤ 30, insufficient (277), < 16, deficient (743)) but was not related to joint pain (seen in 72.2%, 74.0%, 74.6%, of sufficiency and deficiency groups, respectively). Joint symptoms were lower in women randomized to CEE alone (P < 0.01) but did not significantly differ by Ca/D group assignment and no significant interactions were seen between HT and Ca/D. Conclusion: Among healthy postmenopausal women, Ca/D supplementation did not reduce breast cancer risk but the cancers in those randomized to Ca/D were somewhat smaller. Exogenous estrogen use but not Ca/D supplementation influences arthralgias. [Table: see text]


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1504-1504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Maria May ◽  
Willemijn van Gemert ◽  
Petra Peeters ◽  
Job van der Palen ◽  
Jantine Schuit ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document