The Economic and Quality-of-Life Burden of Crohn’s Disease in Europe and the United States, 2000 to 2013: A Systematic Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Floyd ◽  
Sue Langham ◽  
Hélène Chevrou Séverac ◽  
Barrett G. Levesque
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S671-S671
Author(s):  
D Roberts ◽  
Q Liu ◽  
W Czuber-Dochan ◽  
P Smith ◽  
C Norton

Abstract Background The most common cause of intestinal failure (IF) is Crohn’s disease (CD). The definition of IF is ‘the reduction of gut function below the minimum necessary for the absorption of macronutrients and/or water and electrolytes, such that intravenous supplementation is required to maintain health and/or growth’. It is a result of the most severe phenotype of CD, where an individual can no longer obtain sufficient nutrients and fluids from their gut to sustain life without supplementation in the form of parenteral nutrition (PN) or intravenous fluids. Home PN (HPN) allows people to receive infusion at home and increases survival rates (65% after 6 years). Whilst HPN improves length of life, studies have demonstrated this treatment can severely negatively affect an individuals’ quality of life (QoL) and employment. The aim of this systematic review was to identify factors affecting QoL in people with IF. Methods A search of databases MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Global Health, and Scopus was conducted in July 2019. Search terms included ‘Crohn’s disease’, ‘short bowel syndrome’, ‘intestinal failure’, ‘quality of life’, and ‘health-related quality of life’. Titles and abstracts were screened by one reviewer. Any uncertainties about inclusion of the papers were discussed with two reviewers. Full texts were screened by 3 reviewers. Quantitative studies that measured QoL as an outcome in people with IF were included. Results Nineteen studies including a total of 924 participants met the inclusion criteria. Six key themes of factors affecting QoL were identified: (1) Practicalities of IF and HPN, e.g. sleep disturbances from the noise of the pump; managing a high output stoma. (2) Impact of medical interventions, e.g. blood tests. (3) Social impact/physical activity/personal relationships, e.g. restricted ability to travel, socialise and eat with friends. (4) Personal and sexual impact, e.g. lack of sexual desire. (5) Impact of symptoms, e.g. fatigue. (6) Patient characteristics, e.g. age. Some studies also reported positive effects on health (such as more energy), improved symptoms and QoL with HPN, especially for those who had been very unwell previously. Conclusion People with IF often have poor QoL that is affected by many factors, from their symptoms to practical aspects of HPN. However, themes related to the ‘social’ and ‘personal’ impact of IF dominated in the literature. While there is considerable evidence on what affects QoL in people with IF, there appears to very little research on attempting to improve QoL in this patient group.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike van der Have ◽  
Karen S. van der Aalst ◽  
Ad A. Kaptein ◽  
Max Leenders ◽  
Peter D. Siersema ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. S-219
Author(s):  
Mike V Have ◽  
Karen S. van der Aalst ◽  
Adrian A. Kaptein ◽  
Max Leenders ◽  
Peter D. Siersema ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Peng Yu ◽  
Louis A. Cabanilla ◽  
Eric Qiong Wu ◽  
Parvez M. Mulani ◽  
Jingdong Chao

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-276
Author(s):  
Naira Khachatryan ◽  
Maxwell Pistilli ◽  
Maureen G. Maguire ◽  
Angela Y. Chang ◽  
Marissa R. Samuels ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 002073142199484
Author(s):  
Vicente Navarro

This article analyses the political changes that have been occurring in the United States (including the elections for the presidency of the country) and their consequences for the health and quality of life of the population. A major thesis of this article is that there is a need to analyse, besides race and gender, other categories of power - such as social class - in order to understand what happens in the country. While the class structure of the United States is similar to that of major Western European countries, the political context is very different. The U.S. political context has resulted in the very limited power of its working class, which explains the scarcity of labor, political and social rights in the country, such as universal access to health care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document