scholarly journals Role of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization, Cholangioscopic Biopsies, and EUS-FNA in the Evaluation of Biliary Strictures

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 636-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Brooks ◽  
Valerie Gausman ◽  
Chanthel Kokoy-Mondragon ◽  
Khushboo Munot ◽  
Sunil P. Amin ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Hylton ◽  
John E. Tomkiel Dean

Pairings between heterologous chromosomes in meiosis can lead to nondisjunction and the production of aneuploid gametes. To minimize these aberrant outcomes, organisms have evolved mechanisms to disrupt such improper pairings prior to orientation and segregation. In the male fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, bivalents segregate to distinct nuclear domains in prophase I, and it has been proposed that the formation of these distinct territories may play a role in disrupting interactions between limited homologies on heterologous chromosomes. To test this, we used fluorescent in situ hybridization to examine pairing between the X chromosome and Dp(1;3) chromosomes in which a segment of the X had been transposed to chromosome 3. We found that 120kb of homology was sufficient to insure nearly complete pairing but was not sufficient to direct merotelic segregation of the paired elements, suggesting that such pairings were being disrupted. We compared the perdurance of X / Dp(1;3) pairings to that of X / Dp(1;Y) pairings (in which homologs are paired),and found that heterologous pairings were disrupted at a higher frequency at the S2b stage of prophase I, the stage at which territory formation is initiated. Our results support the model that movement of bivalents into distinct domains in prophase I provides a mechanism to disrupt pairings between limited regions of homology, and thus may be one means of preventing improper segregation of heterologs in this organism.


2009 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. S70
Author(s):  
Michael Glick ◽  
Tamas Gonda ◽  
Shahzad Iqbal ◽  
Subhadra Nandula ◽  
Ji Un Kang ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S922
Author(s):  
Zhong Hong Liew ◽  
Jiezhen Tracy Loh ◽  
Kiat Hon Tony Lim ◽  
Christopher Jen Lock Khor ◽  
Steven Mesenas ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (6) ◽  
pp. 552-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy G. Zhou ◽  
Yuxin Liu ◽  
Maryann St. Cyr ◽  
Joanne Garver ◽  
Bruce A. Woda ◽  
...  

Context.—UroVysion fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is routinely used to detect urothelial carcinoma (UC). A positive threshold is defined as chromosome polysomy in 4 or more cells, which also includes tetrasomy, a natural product of cell division. Objectives.—To evaluate tetrasomy for UC detection and explore the relation to the surgical diagnosis or patient history. Design.—The FISH was performed on 1532 urine samples from patients with cytology results and 4 or more years of follow-up. We created separate polysomy and tetrasomy categories and constructed receiver operating curves to determine appropriate thresholds using biopsy (n = 194) as the gold standard. Standard FISH and a novel assay integrating cytomorphology and FISH (Target-FISH) were compared. Matching tissue biopsies of urine samples with 10 or more tetrasomy cells were analyzed. Results.—No significant threshold was found for tetrasomy cells. Exclusion of tetrasomy from the polysomy category changed the threshold from 8.5 to 4.5 cells, increased specificity (59.2% to 78.9%), but reduced sensitivity (78.9% to 65.9%). In Target-FISH, the same approach yielded a specificity of 93.7% and sensitivity of 65.2%. Similarly, specificity improved significantly for low- and high-grade UC, but sensitivity decreased for low-grade UC. No evidence of UC was observed in 95% (52 of 55) of the patients referred for screening who had 10 or more tetrasomy cells by FISH. Matching biopsies for urines containing 10 or more tetrasomy cells showed few or no tetrasomy cells. Conclusions.—Tetrasomy is a nonspecific finding frequently encountered in urine FISH and should be excluded from the polysomy classification. Target-FISH is an optimal approach, offering the ability to detect rare tetrasomy tumors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 315-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong Hong Liew ◽  
Tracy Jiezhen Loh ◽  
Tony Kiat Hon Lim ◽  
Tse Hui Lim ◽  
Christopher Jen Lock Khor ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 596-597
Author(s):  
Joseph P. Alukal ◽  
Bobby B. Najari ◽  
Wilson Chuang ◽  
Lata Murthy ◽  
Monica Lopez-Perdomo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document