scholarly journals Prospective multicenter randomized trial of fast ventricular tachycardia termination by prolonged versus conventional anti-tachyarrhythmia burst pacing in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients-Atp DeliVery for pAiNless ICD thErapy (ADVANCE-D) Trial results

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Santini ◽  
Maurizio Lunati ◽  
Pascal Defaye ◽  
Johann Mermi ◽  
Alessandro Proclemer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Multicenter Randomized Trial

scholarly journals RR interval variability in the evaluation of ventricular tachycardia and effects of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keita Tsukahara ◽  
Yasushi Oginosawa ◽  
Yoshihisa Fujino ◽  
Toshinobu Honda ◽  
Kan Kikuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Cycle Length ◽  
Shock Therapy ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Rr Interval ◽  
Successful Termination ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is the most reliable therapeutic device for preventing sudden cardiac death in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Regarding the effectiveness of the ICD, targeted VT is defined based on the tachyarrhythmia cycle length. However, variation of the RR interval variability of VTs does occur. A few studies reported on VT characteristics and effects of ICD therapy according to RR interval variability. This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics of VTs and effects of ICD therapy according to RR interval variability. Methods: We analyzed 821 VT episodes in 69 of 185 patients treated with ICDs or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. VTs were classified as regular or irregular based on RR interval variability. We evaluated successful termination using anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP)/shock therapy, spontaneous termination, and acceleration between regular and irregular VTs. Reproducibility of the RR interval variability in one VT episode and within an individual with recurrent VT episodes was evaluated. Results: Regular VT was significantly more successfully terminated than irregular VT by ATP therapy. There was no significant difference in shock therapy or VT acceleration, irrespective of the variability of the VT cycle length. Spontaneous termination of VT occurred significantly more often in irregular than in regular VT. Reproducibility of RR interval variability in an episode and individual was 89% and 73%, respectively. Conclusion: ATP therapy showed greater effectiveness for regular than for irregular VT. Spontaneous termination was more common in irregular than in regular VT. RR interval variability of VTs is reproducible.

Worldwide differences in primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator utilization and outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Nauffal ◽  
Peter Marstrand ◽  
Larry Han ◽  
Victoria N Parikh ◽  
Adam S Helms ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Implantation Rates ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims  Risk stratification algorithms for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and regional differences in clinical practice have evolved over time. We sought to compare primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation rates and associated clinical outcomes in US vs. non-US tertiary HCM centres within the international Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry. Methods and results We included patients with HCM enrolled from eight US sites (n = 2650) and five non-US (n = 2660) sites and used multivariable Cox-proportional hazards models to compare outcomes between sites. Primary prevention ICD implantation rates in US sites were two-fold higher than non-US sites (hazard ratio (HR) 2.27 [1.89–2.74]), including in individuals deemed at high 5-year SCD risk (≥6%) based on the HCM risk-SCD score (HR 3.27 [1.76–6.05]). US ICD recipients also had fewer traditional SCD risk factors. Among ICD recipients, rates of appropriate ICD therapy were significantly lower in US vs. non-US sites (HR 0.52 [0.28–0.97]). No significant difference was identified in the incidence of SCD/resuscitated cardiac arrest among non-recipients of ICDs in US vs. non-US sites (HR 1.21 [0.74–1.97]). Conclusion  Primary prevention ICDs are implanted more frequently in patients with HCM in US vs. non-US sites across the spectrum of SCD risk. There was a lower rate of appropriate ICD therapy in US sites, consistent with a lower-risk population, and no significant difference in SCD in US vs. non-US patients who did not receive an ICD. Further studies are needed to understand what drives malignant arrhythmias, optimize ICD allocation, and examine the impact of different ICD utilization strategies on long-term outcomes in HCM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document