Left atrial appendage occlusion in haemophilia patients with atrial fibrillation

Author(s):  
Anders Dahl Kramer ◽  
Kasper Korsholm ◽  
Andreas Kristensen ◽  
Lone Hvitfeldt Poulsen ◽  
Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e044695
Author(s):  
Mu Chen ◽  
Qunshan Wang ◽  
Jian Sun ◽  
Peng-Pai Zhang ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
...  

IntroductionIt is the common clinical practice to prescribe indefinite aspirin for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) post left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). However, aspirin as a primary prevention strategy for cardiovascular diseases has recently been challenged due to increased risk of bleeding. Therefore, aspirin discontinuation after LAAO in atrial fibrillation (ASPIRIN LAAO) trial is designed to assess the uncertainty about the risks and benefits of discontinuing aspirin therapy at 6 months postimplantation with a Watchman LAAO device in NVAF patients.Methods and analysisThe ASPIRIN LAAO study is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial. Patients implanted with a Watchman device within 6 months prior to enrollment and without pre-existing conditions requiring long-term aspirin therapy according to current guidelines are eligible for participating the trial. Subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 allocation ratio to either the Aspirin group (aspirin 100 mg/day) or the control group (placebo) at 6 months postimplantation. A total of 1120 subjects will be enrolled from 12 investigational sites in China. The primary composite endpoint is stroke, systemic embolism, cardiovascular/unexplained death, major bleeding, acute coronary syndrome and coronary or periphery artery disease requiring revascularisation at 24 months. Follow-up visits are scheduled at 6 and 12 months and then every 12 months until 24 months after the last patient recruitment.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai, China (reference number XHEC-C-2018-065-5). The protocol is also submitted and approved by the institutional Ethics Committee at each participating centre. Results are expected in 2024 and will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences.Trial registration numberNCT03821883.


JAMA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 319 (4) ◽  
pp. 365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Friedman ◽  
Jonathan P. Piccini ◽  
Tongrong Wang ◽  
Jiayin Zheng ◽  
S. Chris Malaisrie ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moghniuddin Mohammed ◽  
Nachiket Apte ◽  
Mohammed Ansari ◽  
Amit Noheria ◽  
Seth Sheldon ◽  
...  

Background: Pulmonary vein stenosis is a dreaded complication of endocardial atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation but rare after epicardial ablation and has not been reported after epicardial left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Case: A 55-year-old male was referred to our tertiary hospital for management of left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) stenosis causing dyspnea on exertion. About 2 years prior to presentation, he underwent quadruple coronary artery bypass grafting for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction along with modified Cox-Maze procedure with pulmonary vein and posterior wall isolation as well as epicardial LAAO with AtriClip for history of paroxysmal AF. At our institute, V/Q scan showed ventilation-perfusion mismatch and absent perfusion of the left upper lobe (Figure 1A). Cardiac CT showed persistent LSPV occlusion (Figure 1B). TEE showed atrial appendage occluded with a clip and no flow was observed from LSPV (Figure 1C). After multidisciplinary discussion between cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery teams, surgical approach to remove the AtriClip was deemed futile as it was placed 2 years ago and less likely to result in resolution of stenosis. Thus, an endovascular approach was attempted with left atrial and pulmonary vein angiography showing LSPV to be 100% occluded (Figure 1D). Pulmonary vein recanalization was attempted but was not successful. Conclusion: Our case highlights the importance of recognition of PVS as a possible complication after epicardial LAAO as early intervention can improve patient outcomes. PVS has been previously described with Maze procedure but that patient was successfully treated with catheter-balloon angioplasty. Given 100% occlusion and difficulty with recanalization makes epicardial ablation a less likely cause of occlusion in our case. More careful application of Atriclip protocols might be necessary to prevent this potential complication.


TH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
pp. e351-e353
Author(s):  
Wern Yew Ding ◽  
Gregory Y.H. Lip ◽  
Timothy Fairbairn ◽  
Sukumaran Binukrishnan ◽  
Afshin Khalatbari ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document