Estimates of the Utility of Child Behavior Checklist/Teacher Report Form Attention Problems Scale in the Diagnosis of ADHD in Children Referred to a Specialty Clinic

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Edwards ◽  
Benjamin A. Sigel
Keyword(s):  
Child Behavior ◽  
Child Behavior Checklist ◽  
Attention Problems ◽  
Teacher Report ◽  
Specialty Clinic ◽  
Teacher Report Form

Validity of the Amsterdam Child Behavior Checklist: A Short Rating Scale for Children

1995 ◽  
Vol 77 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1139-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter F. de Jong
Keyword(s):  
Aggressive Behavior ◽  
Child Behavior ◽  
Primary Education ◽  
Child Behavior Checklist ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Emotional Problems ◽  
Attention Problems ◽  
Teacher Report ◽  
Data Support ◽  
Teacher Report Form

The Amsterdam Child Behavior Checklist is a short behavior checklist meant to distinguish between attention problems and several other common behavioral and emotional problems of children in primary education. The list has four scales, Attention Behavior, Restlessness, Aggressive Behavior, and Fear/Uncertainty. We examined the relationships among the scores on the scales and similar scales of the Teacher Report Form, the teachers' version of the Child Behavior Checklist. Teachers from 94 schools rated 454 children on both lists. Analysis showed that the associations between the scores of the scales of the Amsterdam Child Behavior Checklist and of similar scales of the Teacher Report Form ranged from moderate to strong. These data support the validity of the scales of the Amsterdam Child Behavior Checklist.

Parents' and Teachers' Sensitivity to Unhappiness Reported by Undercontrolled Children

1989 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 166-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty C. Epanchin ◽  
Mary Sue Rennells
Keyword(s):  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Behavior Problems ◽  
Child Behavior ◽  
Child Behavior Checklist ◽  
Depressive Symptomatology ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Teacher Report ◽  
Behavioral Ratings ◽  
Self Reports ◽  
Teacher Report Form

The primary purpose of this study was to investigate parents' and teachers' sensitivity to the unhappiness and depression of 110 elementary-aged undercontrolled children being treated in an inpatient program. Sensitivity was operationally defined as congruence between the child's responses on two self-report measures (Children's Depression Inventory and Hopelessness Scale for Children) and the adults' behavioral ratings of the children on behavior checklists (Child Behavior Checklist and Teacher Report Form). The first hypothesis that children's self-reports of depressive symptoms would not be significantly correlated with parents' and teachers' ratings of depressive symptomatology was supported. Secondly, it was hypothesized that there would be no differences in the level of self-reported depressive symptoms when children who were rated as depressed by their parents and teachers were compared with children rated as not depressed by their parents and teachers. This was also supported. Finally, it was hypothesized that children who reported significant levels of depressive symptomatology would be rated by their parents and teachers as having more behavior problems than children who did not report significant levels of depressed symptomatology. This was partially supported. The implications of these results in relation to identification and treatment are discussed.

Assessing anxiety with the Child Behavior Checklist and the Teacher Report Form

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1004-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip C. Kendall ◽  
Anthony C. Puliafico ◽  
Andrea J. Barmish ◽  
Muniya S. Choudhury ◽  
Aude Henin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Child Behavior ◽  
Child Behavior Checklist ◽  
Teacher Report ◽  
Teacher Report Form

scholarly journals Realização acadêmica e problemas de internalização em alunos do ensino básico e secundário em Portugal

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lurdes Veríssimo ◽  
Pedro Dias ◽  
Elodie Santos ◽  
Sofia Ortigão
Keyword(s):  
Child Behavior ◽  
Child Behavior Checklist ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Youth Self Report ◽  
Teacher Report ◽  
Teacher Report Form

Resumo O presente estudo teve como objetivo geral analisar as diferenças nos problemas de internalização (ansiedade, depressão, queixas somáticas), avaliados por diferentes informadores (pais, professores e jovens), em função do nível de realização acadêmica, em alunos do ensino básico e secundário. Para tal, recorreu-se a uma amostra estratificada representativa da população portuguesa constituída por 1.510 alunos, com idades compreendidas entre os 11 e 18 anos. Do conjunto de provas da bateria Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment validados para a população portuguesa, foram utilizadas a Child Behavior Checklist 6-18, a Youth Self-Report 11-18 e a Teacher Report Form 6-18. De uma forma geral, os resultados evidenciam que os alunos com realização acadêmica baixa apresentam mais problemas de internalização do que alunos com realização acadêmica média e/ou elevada. No entanto, no 3º ciclo do ensino básico, na perspectiva dos próprios jovens, os alunos com realização acadêmica elevada apresentam maiores níveis de ansiedade/depressão, comparativamente aos alunos com realização acadêmica baixa. Estes resultados indicam-nos que, para além de os alunos com realização acadêmica baixa se encontrarem numa situação de risco e vulnerabilidade para problemas de internalização, é necessário ter também especial atenção aos alunos com realização acadêmica elevada. Destes resultados decorrem implicações práticas relevantes para os contextos escolares, nomeadamente ao nível da consideração da relação entre a realização acadêmica e o bem-estar psicológico.

Syndrome Dimensions of the Child Behavior Checklist and the Teacher Report Form: A Critical Empirical Evaluation

1999 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1095-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catharina A. Hartman ◽  
Joop Hox ◽  
Judith Auerbach ◽  
Nese Erol ◽  
Antonio C. Fonseca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Child Behavior ◽  
Child Behavior Checklist ◽  
Empirical Evaluation ◽  
Teacher Report ◽  
Teacher Report Form

scholarly journals The Child Behavior Checklist Together with the ADHD Rating Scale Can Diagnose ADHD in Korean Community-Based Samples

2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 802-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Won Kim ◽  
Ki-Hong Park ◽  
Keun-Ah Cheon ◽  
Boong-Nyun Kim ◽  
Soo-Churl Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Child Behavior ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Child Behavior Checklist ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Attention Problems ◽  
School Students ◽  
Case Definitions ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Clinical Method

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical validities and efficiencies of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ARS) in identifying children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Korean community-based samples. Method: A large sample of elementary school students ( n = 1668) participated in this study. We used the CBCL and the ARS as the screening instruments. Diagnoses were determined by clinical psychiatric interviews and confirmed by DSM-IV–based structured interviews. Results: Of the 46 subjects who underwent clinical psychiatric interviews, 33 were diagnosed as having ADHD. A T score of 60 with regard to the Attention Problems profile of the CBCL resulted in a reasonable level of sensitivity or positive predictive value in the diagnosis of ADHD. In both the parent and teacher reports of the ARS, 90th percentile cut-off points resulted in a high level of predictive value. The highest levels of specificity and positive predictive value were obtained when we combined the CBCL ( T ≥ 60 in Attention Problems) and the ARS (parent–teacher total ≥ 90th percentile) reports. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the combined use of the CBCL and the ARS could serve as a rapid and useful clinical method of predicting or even diagnosing children with ADHD in epidemiologic case definitions.

Genetic and environmental influences on teacher ratings of the Child Behavior Checklist

2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary Towers ◽  
Erica Spotts ◽  
Jenae M. Neiderhiser ◽  
Robert Plomin ◽  
E. Mavis Hetherington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Child Behavior ◽  
Child Behavior Checklist ◽  
Social Problems ◽  
Genetic Factors ◽  
Environmental Influences ◽  
Teacher Ratings ◽  
Attention Problems ◽  
Shared Environment ◽  
Sibling Pairs ◽  
Self Reports

The knowledge we have of childhood and adolescent behaviour is, to some extent, a function of the unique perspective of the rater. Although many behavioural genetics studies have used parent and child self-reports in their assessments of child and adolescent adjustment, few have included teacher ratings of behaviour. It is possible that genetic and environmental contributions to teacher reports are different from those using parent and self-reports. The present study examined genetic and environmental influences on six subscales of the Child Behavior Checklist Teacher Report Form (CBC-TRF) using a normative sample of adolescents. The sample consisted of 373 same-sex twin and sibling pairs of varying degrees of genetic relatedness participating in the Nonshared Environment in Adolescent project (NEAD). For all of the CBC subscales, except attention problems and social problems, nonshared environmental influence was the most important source of variance. Additive genetic factors were of moderate importance for externalising behaviours, whereas nonadditive genetic factors contributed to the anxious/depressed, attention problems, withdrawn, and social problems subscales. For none of the constructs was shared environment a significant influence. Three alternative models testing for contrast effects, differences in twin and nontwin siblings, and differences in nondivorced and stepfamilies were examined. In most cases, the best-fitting model was a model that did not include any of these effects, suggesting that these factors do not critically affect the basic model. However, some of the patterns of correlations and parameter estimates were unusual and may warrant future investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document