Maintenance and Generalization in Functional Behavior Assessment/Behavior Intervention Plan Literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany Pennington ◽  
Jessica Simacek ◽  
Jennifer McComas ◽  
Kristen McMaster ◽  
Marianne Elmquist
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rose Iovannone ◽  
Cynthia Anderson ◽  
Terrance Scott

A functional behavior assessment is a process for identifying events in the environment that reliably precede (i.e., antecedents) and follow (i.e., consequences) problem behavior. This information is used to develop an intervention plan. There are two types of antecedents—triggers and setting events. Triggers are antecedent events that happen just before the behavior and seem to push it to happen while setting events can occur at a time removed before the behavior (hours or even days) and set the whole chain in motion. Setting events are not always affecting problem behavior, and they can be difficult to understand and to identify. However, when they are playing a role, it is important that they be included in the functional behavior assessment because support plans will need to incorporate them to be effective. In this article, we describe setting events, discussing how they work and why. We then explain how setting events might be identified, and how they can be incorporated into intervention planning.


2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally M. Barton-Arwood ◽  
Joseph H. Wehby ◽  
Philip L. Gunter ◽  
Kathleen L. Lane

This study evaluated the intrarater reliability of two functional behavior assessment rating scales: the Motivation Assessment Scale and the Problem Behavior Questionnaire. Teachers rated 30 students from 10 self-contained classrooms for students with emotional or behavioral disorders on three separate occasions using both rating scales. Pearson correlation coefficients and exact and adjacent agreement percentages indicated variable and inconsistent ratings across administrations and rating scales. The authors discuss possible reasons for inconsistencies, as well as implications for practice and future research.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrance M. Scott ◽  
Justin T. Cooper

While functional behavior assessment (FBA) has been a part of special education law and embedded in Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) since 1997, a precise definition of what actions or processes constitute a legal FBA has never been adequately addressed in the law. This article provides an overview of the underlying logic of FBA leading to effective function-based intervention. When focusing on a simplification of the logic behind FBA, there are three big ideas that serve as a foundation for considering the intersection of effectiveness and practicality: function matters, FBA requires repeated observations of behavior, and the only purpose of an FBA is to develop an effective intervention. These big ideas are discussed, leading to a conclusion as to how logic and simplicity must share priority in the process.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clayton R. Cook ◽  
G. Roy Mayer ◽  
Diana Browning Wright ◽  
Bonnie Kraemer ◽  
Michele D. Wallace ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn M. Catagnus ◽  
Donald A. Hantula

A team of professional educators in a private school for children with disabilities (a Virtual IEP Team) used an online platform to collaborate and produce a behavior intervention plan for a student. The collaboration was effective and efficient; the plan was produced in 9 days, rather than the customary 3-6 weeks. Qualitative data yielded four major themes: beneficial augmentation, reflective practice, barriers to change, and improved interactions. Quantitative results showed that although end user satisfaction was moderate, they produced a successful behavior intervention plan that showed positive changes in both the teacher and student behavior. An increase of in-person staff discussion as a result of online dialogue was a unique finding in this study warranting further investigation. Now that federal (U.S.) education law has changed to allow technologically mediated IEP meetings, the Virtual IEP Team may serve as a model for more efficient use of education professionals’ time.


2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Shriver ◽  
Cynthia M. Anderson ◽  
Briley Proctor

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-64
Author(s):  
Watinee Opartkiattikul ◽  
Michael Arthur-Kelly ◽  
Ian Dempsey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document