scholarly journals Factors in Removing Job Restrictions for Cancer Survivors in the United Kingdom Royal Air Force

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Murray ◽  
Kin Bong Hubert Lam ◽  
David McLoughlin ◽  
Steven S. Sadhra

The Royal Air Force Institute of Aviation Medicine is located within the perimeter of the Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough as a lodger unit of the Air Ministry. It was first established in 1939, under the direction of Professor Sir Bryan Matthews, and its aim today is exactly that of early war years, namely, to investigate those factors which impair the efficiency of flying personnel in flight, and impair their chances of safety or survival in emergencies in flight or thereafter on the sea or land. In the United Kingdom it is the main laboratory carrying out such work, and thus has come to be the chief source of biological knowledge to the aircraft industry. With regard to giving advice to the Royal Air Force, the Institute is a part of the entire medical branch, but works closely through Flying Personnel Medical Officers, who are responsible for carrying out investigations at the operational squadrons. These officers can interpret directly the biological advice which results from studies in the Institute, but there are no comparable links in industry in this country.


2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. e27424
Author(s):  
Gemma Pugh ◽  
Rachael Hough ◽  
Gill Hubbard ◽  
Elspeth Banks ◽  
Abigail Fisher

1957 ◽  
Vol 61 (555) ◽  
pp. 181-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Allen

The 1,000th Lecture to be given before the Society and the 27th Main Lecture to be held at a Branch of the Society was held under the auspices of the Henlow Branch. The lecture, “Rocket Engines,” was given by Mr. S. Allen, F.R.Ae.S., on 11th October 1956. Professor A. J. Murphy, A.F.R.Ae.S., President of the Henlow Branch, opened the meeting, and Mr. E. T. Jones, C.B., O.B.E., F.R.Ae.S., President of the Society, presided for the rest of the meeting.Professor A. J. Murphy: Tonight they had the great honour of welcoming to Henlow for the first time the parent body of the Royal Aeronautical Society for a Main Society Lecture. On behalf of the Branch he welcomed the President, Mr. E. T. Jones, several Members of Council and other members of the Royal Aeronautical Society.He had been asked to introduce Mr. Jones, and of all the redundant things that he had been called upon to do, that was the most unnecessary. All of them were aware of Mr. Jones' distinguished career in aeronautics and would forgive him, as he knew Mr. Jones would, if he did not enlarge on that aspect. However, there were a large number of people both from the Royal Air Force and the Ministry of Supply present and it seemed appropriate to recall that Mr. Jones served as a pilot and flying instructor in the Royal Flying Corps and Royal Air Force until 1919. Thereafter he joined the Aerodynamics Department of the R.A.E. at Farnborough and since then, as they knew well, he had played an increasingly distinguished part in the experimental establishments connected with the Aircraft Industry and the Royal Air Force and in the field of Aircraft Research and Development. This year, in addition to being elected President of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Mr. Jones became the Director-General of Technical Development (Air) in the Ministry of Supply.Mr. E. T. Jones: This was the first Main Lecture of the Society to be held at the Henlow Branch and in that respect the evening was an historical one.The practice of holding Main Lectures of the Society at Branches was started in 1948 and the underlying idea was to take the Society to the Branches.In all, some two dozen Main Lectures had now been given at one or other of the twenty-four Branches of the Society and it gave him much pleasure to see such a large attendance.This was but the second Main Lecture of the season and curiously enough it was the second to be held at a Branch, This fact caused him to look more closely at the lecture programme and he found that four Main Lectures out of a total of nine this season would be held at the Branches. Thus the Council was doing its best to bring the Society more and more into contact with the Branches and this must surely be a good thing for all those who were interested in aeronautics.He hoped, too. that it would encourage more of the aeronautically minded to attend those of the Main Lectures which were to be held in London.Now it was his pleasant duty to introduce the lecturer.Mr. Sidney Allen was a Fellow of the Society and had had thirty years' continuous experience in the design, research and development of all forms of internal combustion engines for aircraft. For twenty years he had been with Armstrong Siddeley Motors and over the past seven years he had been Chief Engineer of their Rocket Engine Division.He thought he would be right in saying that few people could have more experience in the United Kingdom of rocket engines and he had much pleasure in calling on Mr. Sidney Allen to give his paper.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1564-1564
Author(s):  
Helena Carreira ◽  
Rachael Williams ◽  
Garth Funston ◽  
Susannah Jane Stanway ◽  
Krishnan Bhaskaran

1564 Background: Breast cancer survivors are the largest group of cancer survivors in the United Kingdom (UK). Having had a breast cancer diagnosis may adversely affect the patient’s mental health. We aimed to estimate the long-term risk of anxiety and depression in women with history of breast cancer compared to those who have never had cancer. Methods: We conducted a matched population-based cohort study, using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD primary care database. The exposed cohort included all adult women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1987 and 2018; the unexposed group included women with no cancer history, matched to exposed women in a 4:1 ratio on primary care practice and age. Cox regression models stratified on matched set were used to estimate hazard ratios of the association between breast cancer survivorship and anxiety and depression. Results: 59,972 women (mean 62 years; standard deviation (SD) 14.0) had history of breast cancer. The median follow-up time was 3.0 years (SD 4.4), which amounted to 256,186 person-years under observation. The comparison group included 240,387 women followed up over 3.5 years (SD 4.5) (1,163,819 person-years). The incidence of anxiety in breast cancer survivors was 0.08 (95% confidence interval (95%) 0.07-0.08) per 1000 person-years, and the incidence of depression was 70 (95%CI 68-71) per 1000 person-years. The risks of both depression and anxiety were raised in breast cancer survivors compared with controls, and this appeared to be driven by the first 3 years following diagnosis (Table). Conclusions: Breast cancer survivors in the UK had significantly higher risk anxiety and depression diagnosed in primary care for three years following diagnosis than women who never had cancer. Risk of anxiety and depression in breast cancer survivors compared to women who did not have cancer by time since diagnosis. [Table: see text]


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Murray ◽  
Kin Bong Hubert Lam ◽  
David C. McLoughlin ◽  
Steven S. Sadhra

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document