scholarly journals Relationship Between Eye-Movement Patterns, Cognitive Load, and Reading Ability in Children with Reading Difficulties

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-507
Author(s):  
Aya Ozeri-Rotstain ◽  
Ifaat Shachaf ◽  
Rola Farah ◽  
Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1134-1143
Author(s):  
Gregory P Hindmarsh ◽  
Alex A Black ◽  
Sonia LJ White ◽  
Shelley Hopkins ◽  
Joanne M Wood

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Ramtin Zargari Marandi ◽  
Camilla Ann Fjelsted ◽  
Iris Hrustanovic ◽  
Rikke Dan Olesen ◽  
Parisa Gazerani

The affective dimension of pain contributes to pain perception. Cognitive load may influence pain-related feelings. Eye tracking has proven useful for detecting cognitive load effects objectively by using relevant eye movement characteristics. In this study, we investigated whether eye movement characteristics differ in response to pain-related feelings in the presence of low and high cognitive loads. A set of validated, control, and pain-related sounds were applied to provoke pain-related feelings. Twelve healthy young participants (six females) performed a cognitive task at two load levels, once with the control and once with pain-related sounds in a randomized order. During the tasks, eye movements and task performance were recorded. Afterwards, the participants were asked to fill out questionnaires on their pain perception in response to the applied cognitive loads. Our findings indicate that an increased cognitive load was associated with a decreased saccade peak velocity, saccade frequency, and fixation frequency, as well as an increased fixation duration and pupil dilation range. Among the oculometrics, pain-related feelings were reflected only in the pupillary responses to a low cognitive load. The performance and perceived cognitive load decreased and increased, respectively, with the task load level and were not influenced by the pain-related sounds. Pain-related feelings were lower when performing the task compared with when no task was being performed in an independent group of participants. This might be due to the cognitive engagement during the task. This study demonstrated that cognitive processing could moderate the feelings associated with pain perception.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David St Clair ◽  
Graeme MacLennan ◽  
Sara A. Beedie ◽  
Eva Nouzová ◽  
Helen Lemmon ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0242501
Author(s):  
Jiří Čeněk ◽  
Jie-Li Tsai ◽  
Čeněk Šašinka

Previous research on cross-cultural differences in visual attention has been inconclusive. Some studies have suggested the existence of systematic differences in global and local attention and context sensitivity, while others have produced negative or mixed results. The objective in this study was to examine the similarities and differences in holistic and analytic cognitive styles in a sample of Czech and Taiwanese university students. Two cognitive tasks were conducted: a Compound Figures Test and a free-viewing scene perception task which manipulated several focal objects and measured eye-movement patterns. An analysis of the reaction times in the Compound Figures Test showed no clear differences between either sample. An analysis of eye-movement metrics showed certain differences between the samples. While Czechs tended to focus relatively more on the focal objects measured by the number of fixations, the Taiwanese subjects spent more time fixating on the background. The results were consistent for scenes with one or two focal objects. The results of a correlation analysis of both tasks showed that they were unrelated. These results showed certain differences between the samples in visual perception but were not as systematic as the theory of holistic and analytic cognitive styles would suggest. An alternative model of cross-cultural differences in cognition and perception is discussed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 160 ◽  
pp. 23-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuela Bricolo ◽  
Carola Salvi ◽  
Marialuisa Martelli ◽  
Lisa S. Arduino ◽  
Roberta Daini

2021 ◽  
pp. 145-168
Author(s):  
A. G. Gale ◽  
J. M. Findlay

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document