Cost comparison of syngas production from natural gas conversion and underground coal gasification

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Pei ◽  
Scott F. Korom ◽  
Kegang Ling ◽  
Junior Nasah
Author(s):  
CW Mallett

Effective environmental management of an underground coal gasification pilot has been demonstrated at Kogan in Queensland, Australia. It commenced with selection of a suitable site with a coal seam surrounded by impervious rocks that provided a gas seal for the gasifier and sufficient groundwater pressure to constrain lateral loss of gas and chemicals through coal fractures. Project infrastructure was specified to withstand the temperatures and pressures experienced during gasification and gas processing. During syngas production in the second gasifier, Panel 2, it was shown that all pyrolysis products of environmental concern were retained within the gasifier. This was achieved by maintaining continuous groundwater inflow into the gasifier cavity through control of the relative pressures of the gasifier and surrounding groundwater. In Panel 1, it was shown that when pyrolysis products migrated out of the cavity, they were quickly detected and by modifying relative pressures to increase groundwater inflow the original groundwater conditions were restored. Following production, the cavities were decommissioned and in Panel 2 steam cleaning of the cavity removed 92% of the chemical load from the cavity. As a result, relatively low concentrations of pyrolysis products remained in the cavity. Fate and transport modelling predicted that these products will not migrate into the regional groundwater and will naturally degrade within three decades.


2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. N. Vosmerikova ◽  
A. V. Vosmerikov ◽  
Ya. E. Barbashin ◽  
V. I. Zaikovskii ◽  
V. V. Kozlov

1995 ◽  
Vol 42 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 65-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Gradassi ◽  
N. Wayne Green

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document