Response Time Measures as Supplementary Validity Indicators in Forced-Choice Recognition Memory Performance Validity Tests: A Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Yoram Braw
2020 ◽  
pp. 108705472096457
Author(s):  
Daniel J. White ◽  
Gabriel P. Ovsiew ◽  
Tasha Rhoads ◽  
Zachary J. Resch ◽  
Mary Lee ◽  
...  

Objective: This study examined concordance between symptom and performance validity among clinically-referred patients undergoing neuropsychological evaluation for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Method: Data from 203 patients who completed the WAIS-IV Working Memory Index, the Clinical Assessment of Attention Deficit-Adult (CAT-A), and ≥4 criterion performance validity tests (PVTs) were analyzed. Results: Symptom and performance validity were concordant in 76% of cases, with the majority being valid performance. Of the remaining 24% of cases with divergent validity findings, patients were more likely to exhibit symptom invalidity (15%) than performance invalidity (9%). Patients demonstrating symptom invalidity endorsed significantly more ADHD symptoms than those with credible symptom reporting ( ηp2 = .06–.15), but comparable working memory test performance, whereas patients with performance invalidity had significantly worse working memory performance than those with valid PVT performance ( ηp2 = .18). Conclusion: Symptom and performance invalidity represent dissociable constructs in patients undergoing neuropsychological evaluation of ADHD and should be evaluated independently.


2020 ◽  
Vol 228 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan E. Mitton ◽  
Chris M. Fiacconi

Abstract. To date there has been relatively little research within the domain of metamemory that examines how individuals monitor their performance during memory tests, and whether the outcome of such monitoring informs subsequent memory predictions for novel items. In the current study, we sought to determine whether spontaneous monitoring of test performance can in fact help individuals better appreciate their memory abilities, and in turn shape future judgments of learning (JOLs). Specifically, in two experiments we examined recognition memory for visual images across three study-test cycles, each of which contained novel images. We found that across cycles, participants’ JOLs did in fact increase, reflecting metacognitive sensitivity to near-perfect levels of recognition memory performance. This finding suggests that individuals can and do monitor their test performance in the absence of explicit feedback, and further underscores the important role that test experience can play in shaping metacognitive evaluations of learning and remembering.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Mossman ◽  
William Miller ◽  
Elliot Lee ◽  
Roger Gervais ◽  
Kathleen Hart ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 763-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenni Heikkilä ◽  
Kimmo Alho ◽  
Kaisa Tiippana

Audiovisual semantic congruency during memory encoding has been shown to facilitate later recognition memory performance. However, it is still unclear whether this improvement is due to multisensory semantic congruency or just semantic congruencyper se. We investigated whether dual visual encoding facilitates recognition memory in the same way as audiovisual encoding. The participants memorized auditory or visual stimuli paired with a semantically congruent, incongruent or non-semantic stimulus in the same modality or in the other modality during encoding. Subsequent recognition memory performance was better when the stimulus was initially paired with a semantically congruent stimulus than when it was paired with a non-semantic stimulus. This congruency effect was observed with both audiovisual and dual visual stimuli. The present results indicate that not only multisensory but also unisensory semantically congruent stimuli can improve memory performance. Thus, the semantic congruency effect is not solely a multisensory phenomenon, as has been suggested previously.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document