Efficient three-step iterative methods with sixth order convergence for nonlinear equations

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Cordero ◽  
José L. Hueso ◽  
Eulalia Martínez ◽  
Juan R. Torregrosa
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahereh Eftekhari

Based on iterative methods without memory of eighth-order convergence proposed by Thukral (2012), some iterative methods with memory and high efficiency index are presented. We show that the order of convergence is increased without any additional function evaluations. Numerical comparisons are made to show the performance of the presented methods.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Fernández-Torres ◽  
Juan Vásquez-Aquino

We present new modifications to Newton's method for solving nonlinear equations. The analysis of convergence shows that these methods have fourth-order convergence. Each of the three methods uses three functional evaluations. Thus, according to Kung-Traub's conjecture, these are optimal methods. With the previous ideas, we extend the analysis to functions with multiple roots. Several numerical examples are given to illustrate that the presented methods have better performance compared with Newton's classical method and other methods of fourth-order convergence recently published.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-123
Author(s):  
Morteza Bisheh-Niasar ◽  
Abbas Saadatmandi

The aim of this paper is to present a new nonstandard Newton iterative method for solving nonlinear equations. The convergence of the proposed method is proved and it is shown that the new method has cubic convergence. Furthermore, two new multi-point methods with sixth-order convergence, based on the introduced method, are presented. Also, we describe the basins of attraction for these methods. Finally, some numerical examples are given to show the performance of our methods by comparing with some other methods available in the literature


Mathematics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengfeng Li ◽  
Xiaobin Liu ◽  
Xiaofang Zhang

In this paper, a few single-step iterative methods, including classical Newton’s method and Halley’s method, are suggested by applying [ 1 , n ] -order Padé approximation of function for finding the roots of nonlinear equations at first. In order to avoid the operation of high-order derivatives of function, we modify the presented methods with fourth-order convergence by using the approximants of the second derivative and third derivative, respectively. Thus, several modified two-step iterative methods are obtained for solving nonlinear equations, and the convergence of the variants is then analyzed that they are of the fourth-order convergence. Finally, numerical experiments are given to illustrate the practicability of the suggested variants. Henceforth, the variants with fourth-order convergence have been considered as the imperative improvements to find the roots of nonlinear equations.


2012 ◽  
Vol 490-495 ◽  
pp. 1839-1843
Author(s):  
Rui Chen ◽  
Liang Fang

In this paper, we present and analyze a modified Newton-type method with oder of convergence six for solving nonlinear equations. The method is free from second derivatives. It requires three evaluations of the functions and two evaluations of derivatives in each step. Therefore the efficiency index of the presented method is 1.431 which is better than that of classical Newton’s method 1.414. Some numerical results illustrate that the proposed method is more efficient and performs better than classical Newton's method


2011 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 3124-3128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Fang ◽  
Tao Chen ◽  
Li Tian ◽  
Li Sun ◽  
Bin Chen

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Cordero ◽  
Mojtaba Fardi ◽  
Mehdi Ghasemi ◽  
Juan R. Torregrosa

We propose a family of eighth-order iterative methods without memory for solving nonlinear equations. The new iterative methods are developed by using weight function method and using an approximation for the last derivative, which reduces the required number of functional evaluations per step. Their efficiency indices are all found to be 1.682. Several examples allow us to compare our algorithms with known ones and confirm the theoretical results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document