Reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0)

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 691-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Soles Gonçalves ◽  
João Neves Gil ◽  
Luís Manuel Cavalheiro ◽  
Rui Dias Costa ◽  
Pedro Lopes Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Portuguese Version ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale

scholarly journals Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Uk Choi ◽  
Hye Sun Lee ◽  
Joon Ho Shin ◽  
Seung Hee Ho ◽  
Mi Jung Koo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Korean Version ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Validity Evaluation

scholarly journals The Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-221
Author(s):  
Mitsuhiro OCHI ◽  
Hiroshi OHASHI ◽  
Kenji HACHISUKA ◽  
Satoru SAEKI
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale

scholarly journals Reliability and Validity of the Nigerian (Hausa) Version of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0 Index

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashiru Hamza Mohammad ◽  
Nabilla Al-Sadat ◽  
Loh Siew Yim ◽  
Karuthan Chinna
Keyword(s):  
Hand Function ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Referral Hospitals ◽  
Parsimonious Model ◽  
Validity Tests ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

This study aims to test the translated Hausa version of the stroke impact scale SIS (3.0) and further evaluate its psychometric properties. The SIS 3.0 was translated from English into Hausa and was tested for its reliability and validity on a stratified random sample adult stroke survivors attending rehabilitation services at stroke referral hospitals in Kano, Nigeria. Psychometric analysis of the Hausa-SIS 3.0 involved face, content, criterion, and construct validity tests as well as internal and test-retest reliability. In reliability analyses, the Cronbach’s alpha values for the items in Strength, Hand function, Mobility, ADL/IADL, Memory and thinking, Communication, Emotion, and Social participation domains were 0.80, 0.92, 0.90, 0.78, 0.84, 0.89, 0.58, and 0.74, respectively. There are 8 domains in stroke impact scale 3.0 in confirmatory factory analysis; some of the items in the Hausa-SIS questionnaire have to be dropped due to lack of discriminate validity. In the final analysis, a parsimonious model was obtained with two items per construct for the 8 constructs (Chi-square/df<3, TLI and CFI>0.9, and RMSEA<0.08). Cross validation with 1000 bootstrap samples gave a satisfactory result (P = 0.011). In conclusion, the shorter 16-item Hausa-SIS seems to measure adequately the QOL outcomes in the 8 domains.

scholarly journals Recovery of Visuospatial Neglect Subtypes and Relationship to Functional Outcome Six Months After Stroke

2021 ◽  
pp. 154596832110329
Author(s):  
Margaret J. Moore ◽  
Kathleen Vancleef ◽  
M. Jane Riddoch ◽  
Celine R. Gillebert ◽  
Nele Demeyere
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Visuospatial Neglect ◽  
Recovery Pattern ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Initial Severity

Background/Objective. This study aims to investigate how complex visuospatial neglect behavioural phenotypes predict long-term outcomes, both in terms of neglect recovery and broader functional outcomes after 6 months post-stroke. Methods. This study presents a secondary cohort study of acute and 6-month follow-up data from 400 stroke survivors who completed the Oxford Cognitive Screen’s Cancellation Task. At follow-up, patients also completed the Stroke Impact Scale questionnaire. These data were analysed to identify whether any specific combination of neglect symptoms is more likely to result in long-lasting neglect or higher levels of functional impairment, therefore warranting more targeted rehabilitation. Results. Overall, 98/142 (69%) neglect cases recovered by follow-up, and there was no significant difference in the persistence of egocentric/allocentric (X2 [1] = .66 and P = .418) or left/right neglect (X2 [2] = .781 and P = .677). Egocentric neglect was found to follow a proportional recovery pattern with all patients demonstrating a similar level of improvement over time. Conversely, allocentric neglect followed a non-proportional recovery pattern with chronic neglect patients exhibiting a slower rate of improvement than those who recovered. A multiple regression analysis revealed that the initial severity of acute allocentric, but not egocentric, neglect impairment acted as a significant predictor of poor long-term functional outcomes (F [9,300] = 4.742, P < .001 and adjusted R2 = .098). Conclusions. Our findings call for systematic neuropsychological assessment of both egocentric and allocentric neglect following stroke, as the occurrence and severity of these conditions may help predict recovery outcomes over and above stroke severity alone.

scholarly journals Psychometric properties of the short form of the Stroke Impact Scale in German-speaking stroke survivors

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Coppers ◽  
Jens Carsten Möller ◽  
Detlef Marks
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Cognitive Domain ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background The short form of the Stroke Impact Scale (SF-SIS) consists of eight questions and provides an overall index of health-related quality of life after stroke. The goal of the study was the evaluation of construct validity, reliability and responsiveness of the SF-SIS for the use in German-speaking stroke patients in rehabilitation. Methods The SF-SIS, the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0), EQ-5D-5L, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and de Morton Mobility Index were assessed in 150 inpatients after stroke, with a second measurement two weeks later for the analyses of responsiveness. In 55 participants, the test–retest-reliability was assessed one week after the first measurement. The study was designed following the recommendations of the COSMIN initiative. Results The correlations of the SF-SIS with the SIS 2.0 (ρ = 0.90), as well as the EQ-5D-5L (ρ = 0.79) were high, as expected. There was adequate discriminatory ability of the SF-SIS index between patients who were less and more severely affected by stroke, as assessed by the NIHSS. Exploratory factor analysis indicated a two-factor structure of the SF-SIS explaining 59.9% of the total variance, providing better model fit in the confirmatory factor analysis than the one-factorial structure. Analyses of test–retest-reliability showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.88 (95% CI 0.75–0.94). Hypotheses concerning responsiveness were not confirmed due to lower correlations between the assessments change scores. Conclusion Results of this analysis of the SF-SIS’s psychometric properties are matching with the validity analysis of the English original version, confirming the high correlations with the Stroke Impact Scale and the EQ-5D-5L. Examination of structural validity did not confirm the presumed unidimensionality of the scale and found evidence of an underlying two-factor solution with a physical and cognitive domain. Sufficient test–retest reliability and internal consistency were found. In addition, this study provides first results for the responsiveness of the German version. Trial registration The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register. Trial registration number: DRKS00011933, date of registration: 07.04.2017

How Much Change in the Stroke Impact Scale-16 Is Important to People Who Have Experienced a Stroke?

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 477-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
George D. Fulk ◽  
Miriam Ludwig ◽  
Kari Dunning ◽  
Sue Golden ◽  
Pierce Boyne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale

scholarly journals Outcome after Stroke upon Awakening

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janel O. Nadeau ◽  
Jiming Fang ◽  
Moira K. Kapral ◽  
Frank L. Silver ◽  
Michael D. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Linear Modeling ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Level Of Consciousness ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Ischemic Attack

ABSTRACT:Background:An estimated 20-25% of all strokes occur during sleep and these patients wake up with their deficits. This study evaluated outcomes among patients who woke up with stroke compared to those who were awake at stroke onset.Methods:Using data from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network Phases 1 and 2, we compared demographics, clinical data and six-month outcomes between patients with stroke-on-awakening versus stroke-while-awake. Strokes of all types (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage) were included. Standard descriptive statistics, multivariable logistic regression and general linear modeling were applied to the data to compare variables.Results:Among 2,585 stroke patients, 349 (13.5%) woke up with stroke and 2,236 (86.5%) did not. Patients with stroke-on-awakening were more likely to have higher blood pressure and to suffer ischemic stroke, but stroke severity, measured by level of consciousness, did not differ. Mortality both at discharge and at six-month follow-up did not differ between the two cohorts. However, patients with stroke-on-awakening were less likely to return home, and their median Stroke Impact Scale-16 scores were 7.0 points lower compared to those with stroke-while-awake.Conclusions:There are minor demographic and clinical differences between patients with stroke-on-awakening and stroke-while-awake. Functional outcomes are slightly worse among patients with stroke-on-awakening, an effect which was driven by poor outcomes among patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document