scholarly journals Reliability and Validity of the Nigerian (Hausa) Version of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0 Index

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashiru Hamza Mohammad ◽  
Nabilla Al-Sadat ◽  
Loh Siew Yim ◽  
Karuthan Chinna
Keyword(s):  
Hand Function ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Referral Hospitals ◽  
Parsimonious Model ◽  
Validity Tests ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

This study aims to test the translated Hausa version of the stroke impact scale SIS (3.0) and further evaluate its psychometric properties. The SIS 3.0 was translated from English into Hausa and was tested for its reliability and validity on a stratified random sample adult stroke survivors attending rehabilitation services at stroke referral hospitals in Kano, Nigeria. Psychometric analysis of the Hausa-SIS 3.0 involved face, content, criterion, and construct validity tests as well as internal and test-retest reliability. In reliability analyses, the Cronbach’s alpha values for the items in Strength, Hand function, Mobility, ADL/IADL, Memory and thinking, Communication, Emotion, and Social participation domains were 0.80, 0.92, 0.90, 0.78, 0.84, 0.89, 0.58, and 0.74, respectively. There are 8 domains in stroke impact scale 3.0 in confirmatory factory analysis; some of the items in the Hausa-SIS questionnaire have to be dropped due to lack of discriminate validity. In the final analysis, a parsimonious model was obtained with two items per construct for the 8 constructs (Chi-square/df<3, TLI and CFI>0.9, and RMSEA<0.08). Cross validation with 1000 bootstrap samples gave a satisfactory result (P = 0.011). In conclusion, the shorter 16-item Hausa-SIS seems to measure adequately the QOL outcomes in the 8 domains.

Translation and validation of the stroke impact scale 3.0 into urdu for Pakistan

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Umair Ahmed ◽  
Hossein Karimi ◽  
Syed Amir Gilani ◽  
Ashfaq Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Assess Quality ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Translation And Validation

BACKGROUND: The Stroke Impact Scale version 3.0 (SIS 3.0) is a self-reported outcome measure designed to assess quality of life (QoL) following a stroke. Although the psychometric properties of the SIS 3.0 are identified as superior to the generic QoL scales, it has not been translated and tested in Pakistan. OBJECTIVE: To validate the Urdu version of the SIS 3.0 (USIS 3.0) for Pakistan. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 116 patients with mild to moderate stroke reported their recovery using the USIS 3.0. The patients were concurrently assessed on the established tools to assess the validity and were re-evaluated to determine the test-retest reliability, precision, minimal detectable change (MDC), and minimal clinically important difference (MCID). RESULTS: The reliability and internal consistency of USIS were satisfactory except for the emotion domain. The correlations of USIS with the established tools were strong. The discriminant validity was also significant across the levels of the modified Rankin scale (MRS). Only hand function and communication domains exhibited significant floor and ceiling effects, respectively. Regarding weighted K, values ranged from 0.53 to 0.88. CONCLUSIONS: The USIS 3.0 has satisfactory psychometric properties and can be used in clinical and research settings for stroke survivors.

scholarly journals Psychometric properties of the short form of the Stroke Impact Scale in German-speaking stroke survivors

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Coppers ◽  
Jens Carsten Möller ◽  
Detlef Marks
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Cognitive Domain ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background The short form of the Stroke Impact Scale (SF-SIS) consists of eight questions and provides an overall index of health-related quality of life after stroke. The goal of the study was the evaluation of construct validity, reliability and responsiveness of the SF-SIS for the use in German-speaking stroke patients in rehabilitation. Methods The SF-SIS, the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0), EQ-5D-5L, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and de Morton Mobility Index were assessed in 150 inpatients after stroke, with a second measurement two weeks later for the analyses of responsiveness. In 55 participants, the test–retest-reliability was assessed one week after the first measurement. The study was designed following the recommendations of the COSMIN initiative. Results The correlations of the SF-SIS with the SIS 2.0 (ρ = 0.90), as well as the EQ-5D-5L (ρ = 0.79) were high, as expected. There was adequate discriminatory ability of the SF-SIS index between patients who were less and more severely affected by stroke, as assessed by the NIHSS. Exploratory factor analysis indicated a two-factor structure of the SF-SIS explaining 59.9% of the total variance, providing better model fit in the confirmatory factor analysis than the one-factorial structure. Analyses of test–retest-reliability showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.88 (95% CI 0.75–0.94). Hypotheses concerning responsiveness were not confirmed due to lower correlations between the assessments change scores. Conclusion Results of this analysis of the SF-SIS’s psychometric properties are matching with the validity analysis of the English original version, confirming the high correlations with the Stroke Impact Scale and the EQ-5D-5L. Examination of structural validity did not confirm the presumed unidimensionality of the scale and found evidence of an underlying two-factor solution with a physical and cognitive domain. Sufficient test–retest reliability and internal consistency were found. In addition, this study provides first results for the responsiveness of the German version. Trial registration The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register. Trial registration number: DRKS00011933, date of registration: 07.04.2017

scholarly journals Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Uk Choi ◽  
Hye Sun Lee ◽  
Joon Ho Shin ◽  
Seung Hee Ho ◽  
Mi Jung Koo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Korean Version ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Validity Evaluation

Reliability and Validity of the Arthritis Hand Function Test in Adults with Osteoarthritis

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Backman ◽  
Hazel Mackie
Keyword(s):  
Daily Living ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Reliable Measure ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Function Test ◽  
Valid Test ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Physical Components

The Arthritis Hand Function Test (AHFT) has shown promise as a standardized, reliable measure of hand function in adults with rheumatoid arthritis in previous studies. This study adds to the development of the multi-item AHFT by evaluating its inter-rater and test-retest reliability in a sample of 26 adults (mean age, 67 years) with osteoarthritis. Further, because ability to perform activities of daily living (ADD is predicated on physical components such as hand function, the validity of the AHFT is examined by correlating the scores achieved by these subjects with their scores from self-report measures of physical ADL and instrumental ADL. Analysis indicates strong inter-rater reliability ( r= 0.99 or better for all AHFT items) and moderate to strong test-retest reliability (range, r= 0.74 to r=0.96). Moderate correlations for most AHFT items with physical ADL and instrumental ADL lend support to its development as a valid test of hand function.

Reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0)

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 691-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Soles Gonçalves ◽  
João Neves Gil ◽  
Luís Manuel Cavalheiro ◽  
Rui Dias Costa ◽  
Pedro Lopes Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Portuguese Version ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale

scholarly journals Cultural adaptation and validation of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 version in Uganda: A small-scale study

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 205031211667185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julius T Kamwesiga ◽  
Lena von Koch ◽  
Anders Kottorp ◽  
Susanne Guidetti
Keyword(s):  
Rasch Model ◽  
Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Culturally Adapted ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Background: Knowledge is scarce about the impact of stroke in Uganda, and culturally adapted, psychometrically tested patient-reported outcome measures are lacking. The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 is recommended, but it has not been culturally adapted and validated in Uganda. Objective: To culturally adapt and determine the psychometric properties of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 in the Ugandan context on a small scale. Method: The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 was culturally adapted to form Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 Uganda ( in English) by involving 25 participants in three different expert committees. Subsequently, Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 Uganda from English to Luganda language was done in accordance with guidelines. The first language in Uganda is English and Luganda is the main spoken language in Kampala city and its surroundings. Translation of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 Uganda ( both in English and Luganda) was then tested psychometrically by applying a Rasch model on data collected from 95 participants with stroke. Results: Overall, 10 of 59 (17%) items in the eight domains of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 were culturally adapted. The majority were 6 of 10 items in the domain Activities of Daily Living, 2 of 9 items in the domain Mobility, and 2 of 5 items in the domain Hand function. Only in two domains, all items demonstrated acceptable goodness of fit to the Rasch model. There were also more than 5% person misfits in the domains Participation and Emotion, while the Communication, Mobility, and Hand function domains had the lowest proportions of person misfits. The reliability coefficient was equal or larger than 0.90 in all domains except the Emotion domain, which was below the set criterion of 0.80 (0.75). Conclusion: The cultural adaptation and translation of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 Uganda provides initial evidence of validity of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 when used in this context. The results provide support for several aspects of validity and precision but also point out issues for further adaptation and improvement of the Stroke Impact Scale.

scholarly journals Validation of a Malay Version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation (PRWHE-MV)

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teh KH ◽  
Mohamed Saaid F ◽  
Arumugam M ◽  
Rosli MRI
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Hand Evaluation ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Quick Dash ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

INTRODUCTION: The Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) is a widely used measure of patient[1]reported disability, pain and appearance related to both hand and wrist disorders. It has been adapted cross[1]culturally worldwide but not in Malaysia. We performed a translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PRWHE into a Malay version (PRWHE-MV) with assessed reliability and validity in patients presented with hand and/or wrist disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PRWHE-MV was developed via translation and resolution of cultural discrepancies. A total of 83 patients (38 men, 45 women) with the mean age of 38 (SD 14) years and hand and/or wrist disorders completed both PRWHE-MV and the Malay version of Quick DASH during their first orthopaedic hand clinic follow up, and a second PRWHE-MV at 48 hours later. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reliability of the PRWHE-MV while Cronbach’s alpha was calculated to assess the internal consistency. We tested the validity of PRWHE-MV against the Malay version of Quick DASH by calculating the nonparametric Spearman’s correlation coefficient between these two measures. RESULTS: There was no major cultural problems during the forward and backward translation of PRWHE, except for a minor change owing to cultural discrepancy in toilet hygiene. The Cronbach alpha PRWHE-MV was 0.978 (SEM = 5.5) at baseline and 0.979 (SEM = 5.35) at the second assessment. For the test-retest reliability, ICC was 0.99. There was a strong direct correlation between the scores for the PRWHE-MV and the Quick DASH (r = 0.916, p< 0.001). A majority of patients considered hand appearance somewhat important and were bothered in the past week. Their main concerns were gaining back normal hand function and subsequently returning to work. CONCLUSION: The PRWHE-MV showed high internal consistency, test-retest reliability and good validity in patients with hand and/or wrist disorders.

Characterization of muscle strength using the strength domain of the stroke impact scale: An integrative review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Richard W. Bohannon
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Paretic Limb ◽  
Stroke Impact Scale ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Muscle weakness is among the most common and obvious impairments in older adults and individuals with neurologic disorders. Although impairments in muscle strength are typically characterized using performance measures, the impairments have also been described using patient or observerreport. The objective of this review was to summarize literature describing use of a patientreport instrument, the Strength Domain (SD) of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), to grade strength impairments. METHODS: Peer-reviewed literature reporting SD scores for the SIS was identified using computerized searches of the CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus databases followed by hand searches. Potentially relevant articles were then mined for data on the participants tested, the SIS version used, scores documented, and clinimetric properties reported. RESULTS: Sixty-five articles were judged appropriate based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The articles involved more than 7000 residents of 22 countries. All articles focused on individuals with stroke (usually chronic), although one also included community-dwelling adults without stroke. The SIS version used was frequently unreported, but 3.0 was version most often specified. For articles reporting SD scale scores the mean ranged from 19.7 to 85.5. Construct (known groups, convergent, and discriminant) validity of the SD was supported by the literature as was its internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Responsiveness of the SD was evinced by numerous studies showing increases in SD scores with time or accompanying effective interventions. However, only one study indicated responsiveness using an anchor-based statistic. CONCLUSIONS: The SD of the SIS is a wellestablished and mostly clinimetrically sound patient-report measure of paretic limb strength among individuals with stroke. Its use with individuals with weakness accompanying aging or diagnoses other than stroke remains to be substantiated.

scholarly journals Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Joo-Hyun Lee ◽  
Ji-Hyuk Park ◽  
Yeong Jo Kim ◽  
Sang Heon Lee ◽  
Marcel W. M. Post ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Local Community ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Korean Version ◽  
Participation Level ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

This study investigated the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (K-USER-P) in patients with stroke. Stroke patients participated in this study. The Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation was translated from English into Korean. A total of 120 questionnaires involving the K-USER-P were distributed to rehabilitation hospitals and centers by mail. Of those, 100 questionnaires were returned and 67 were included in the final analysis after exclusion of questionnaires with insufficient responses. We analyzed the questionnaires for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity. The results indicated that internal consistency coefficients of the frequency, restriction, and satisfaction domains were 0.69, 0.66, and 0.67, respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.63, 0.45, and 0.71 for the three domains, respectively. Intercorrelations between the SF-12 and the London Handicap Scale were generally moderate to good. The Korean version of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation can be used as a measure of the participation level of stroke patients in clinical practice and the local community.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document