scholarly journals Combining Stated and Revealed Preference Data to Construct an Empirical Examination of Intrahousehold Bargaining

2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Dosman ◽  
Wiktor Adamowicz
2018 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 70-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Paul Helveston ◽  
Elea McDonnell Feit ◽  
Jeremy J. Michalek

Author(s):  
Irwan Prasetyo ◽  
Daisuke Fukuda ◽  
Hirosato Yoshino ◽  
Tetsuo Yai

Quantification of the value of time (VOT) is important for measurement of the benefit of transportation projects in terms of travel time savings. In Japan, VOT is considered higher on weekends than on weekdays because on the weekend people have limited time to allocate to discretionary activities that are not normally done on weekdays, such as family care-related activities. In Indonesia, a culturally diverse country, providers and users seem to have different perceptions of VOT. A method of analyzing the value of activity time is presented. It argues that the benefit of travel time saving should be evaluated in more detail on weekends by considering the value of discretionary activities to explain these phenomena theoretically. Activity diary surveys were conducted in Tokyo, Japan, and Jakarta, Indonesia, to verify the influence of psychological needs on people's holiday activities. Finally, a time allocation model that uses the revealed preference data and a marginal activity choice model that uses stated preference data are proposed to calculate the value of activity time. The theories underpinning these models are Maslow's psychological needs, consumer theory in economics, and a discrete choice model. The empirical results show that an individual's priority of needs influences time allocation. In particular, the results show that in Tokyo, spending time with family on weekends is more valuable than other types of activities, while in Indonesia the value of spending time with family exceeds that of work time even on weekdays.


Author(s):  
Denzil G. Fiebig ◽  
Hong Il Yoo

Stated preference methods are used to collect individual-level data on what respondents say they would do when faced with a hypothetical but realistic situation. The hypothetical nature of the data has long been a source of concern among researchers as such data stand in contrast to revealed preference data, which record the choices made by individuals in actual market situations. But there is considerable support for stated preference methods as they are a cost-effective means of generating data that can be specifically tailored to a research question and, in some cases, such as gauging preferences for a new product or non-market good, there may be no practical alternative source of data. While stated preference data come in many forms, the primary focus in this article is data generated by discrete choice experiments, and thus the econometric methods will be those associated with modeling binary and multinomial choices with panel data.


2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhazn Gillig ◽  
Richard Woodward ◽  
Teofilo Ozuna ◽  
Wade L. Griffin

This study extends the joint estimation of revealed and stated preference data literature by accounting for truncation in the revealed preference data. The analytical model and estimation procedure are used to estimate the value of recreational red snapper fishing in the Gulf of Mexico. This recreational red snapper valuation is decomposed into its direct and indirect components. As expected, the value of recreational red snapper fishing using the joint revealed-stated preference model proposed in this analysis is bracketed on the upper limit by the value obtained using the contingent valuation method and on the lower limit by the travel cost method. The results also indicate that the joint model improves the precision of estimated recreational red snapper valuation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document