Expression of glutamate dehydrogenase genes in Arabidopsis thaliana depends on the redox state of plastoquinone pool

Author(s):  
Elena Yu. Garnik ◽  
Vadim I. Belkov ◽  
Vladislav I. Tarasenko ◽  
Alexandr V. Rudikovskii ◽  
Yuri M. Konstantinov
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Yu. Garnik ◽  
Vadim I. Belkov ◽  
Vladislav I. Tarasenko ◽  
Yury M. Konstantinov

Abstract Plant glutamate dehydrogenase is an enzyme interconverting L-glutamate and 2-oxoglutarate and providing a link between carbon and nitrogen metabolism. In Arabidopsis thaliana, this enzyme is encoded by three genes. Two of them, GDH1 and GDH2, provide most of the enzyme activity in plant leaves and roots. Expression of GDH1 and GDH2 genes is very low in the light and high in the dark. The molecular signals and mechanisms that provide the light-dependent GDH genes regulation remain unknown. Using photosynthetic electron transport inhibitors 3-(3.4-dichlorophenyl)-1.1-dimethylurea (DCMU) and 2.5-dibromo-3-methyl-6-isopropyl benzoquinone (DBMIB) we demonstrate that transcript levels of the GDH1 and GDH2 genes in Arabidopsis leaves change in accordance with a redox state of chloroplast electron transport chain: they are low when it is highly reduced and high when it is oxidized. Hydrogen peroxide or high light treatment did not result in decreasing of GDH1 or GDH2 expression, so reactive oxygen species cannot be the signals that reduce expression of these genes during dark-to-light shifts. There was no significant difference between the glucose content in the leaves of plants treated with DCMU and the plants treated with DBMIB, so glucose is not the only or the main factor that regulates expression of the studied genes. We presume that expression of Arabidopsis GDH1 and GDH2 genes depends on the chloroplast electron transport chain redox state. This regulatory mechanism could arise because of a need to avoid a competition for substrate between tetrapyrrole synthesis, glutathione synthesis and using of L-glutamate as an energy source during prolonged darkness.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Yu Wang ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
Jian-Zhong Xu ◽  
Wei-Guo Zhang ◽  
Xiu-Lai Chen ◽  
...  

The production of l-leucine was improved by the disruption of ltbR encoding transcriptional regulator and overexpression of the key genes (leuAilvBNCE) of the l-leucine biosynthesis pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum XQ-9. In order to improve l-leucine production, we rationally engineered C. glutamicum to enhance l-leucine production, by improving the redox flux. On the basis of this, we manipulated the redox state of the cells by mutating the coenzyme-binding domains of acetohydroxyacid isomeroreductase encoded by ilvC, inserting NAD-specific leucine dehydrogenase, encoded by leuDH from Lysinibacillus sphaericus, and glutamate dehydrogenase encoded by rocG from Bacillus subtilis, instead of endogenous branched-chain amino acid transaminase and glutamate dehydrogenase, respectively. The yield of l-leucine reached 22.62 ± 0.17 g·L−1 by strain ΔLtbR-acetohydroxyacid isomeroreductase (AHAIR)M/ABNCME, and the concentrations of the by-products (l-valine and l-alanine) increased, compared to the strain ΔLtbR/ABNCE. Strain ΔLtbR-AHAIRMLeuDH/ABNCMLDH accumulated 22.87±0.31 g·L−1 l-leucine, but showed a drastically low l-valine accumulation (from 8.06 ± 0.35 g·L−1 to 2.72 ± 0.11 g·L−1), in comparison to strain ΔLtbR-AHAIRM/ABNCME, which indicated that LeuDH has much specificity for l-leucine synthesis but not for l-valine synthesis. Subsequently, the resultant strain ΔLtbR-AHAIRMLeuDHRocG/ABNCMLDH accumulated 23.31 ± 0.24 g·L−1 l-leucine with a glucose conversion efficiency of 0.191 g·g−1.


2014 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 225-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Marchi ◽  
Eugenia Polverini ◽  
Francesca Degola ◽  
Enrico Baruffini ◽  
Francesco Maria Restivo

FEBS Letters ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 594 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Khorobrykh ◽  
Tatsuhiro Tsurumaki ◽  
Kan Tanaka ◽  
Taina Tyystjärvi ◽  
Esa Tyystjärvi

2013 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 368-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Marchi ◽  
Francesca Degola ◽  
Eugenia Polverini ◽  
Thérèse Tercé-Laforgue ◽  
Frédéric Dubois ◽  
...  

Chemosphere ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Drążkiewicz ◽  
Ewa Skórzyńska-Polit ◽  
Zbigniew Krupa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document