scholarly journals Evolution of dark energy–dark matter-coupled expanding universe

2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (33) ◽  
pp. 4473-4477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ti-Pei Li ◽  
Mei Wu
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tsizh ◽  
B. Novosyadlyj

We investigate the non-linear evolution of spherical density and velocity perturbations of dark matter and dark energy in the expanding Universe. For this we have used the conservation and Einstein equations to describe the evolution of gravitationally coupled inhomogeneities of dark matter, dark energy and radiation from the linear stage in the early Universe to the non-linear stage at the current epoch. A simple method of numerical integration of the system of non-linear differential equations for evolution of the central part of halo is proposed. The results are presented for the halo of cluster (k=2 Mpc-1) and supercluster scales (k=0.2 Mpc-1) and show that a quintessential scalar field dark energy with a low value of effective speed of sound cs<0.1 can have a notable impact on the formation of large-scale structures in the expanding Universe.


2014 ◽  
Vol 355 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
En-Kun Li ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Jin-Ling Geng ◽  
Peng-Fei Duan

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong-Jie Zhang ◽  
Cong Ma ◽  
Tian Lan

This paper is a review on the observational Hubble parameter data that have gained increasing attention in recent years for their illuminating power on the dark side of the universe: the dark matter, dark energy, and the dark age. Currently, there are two major methods of independent observationalH(z)measurement, which we summarize as the “differential age method” and the “radial BAO size method.” Starting with fundamental cosmological notions such as the spacetime coordinates in an expanding universe, we present the basic principles behind the two methods. We further review the two methods in greater detail, including the source of errors. We show how the observationalH(z)data present itself as a useful tool in the study of cosmological models and parameter constraint, and we also discuss several issues associated with their applications. Finally, we point the reader to a future prospect of upcoming observation programs that will lead to some major improvements in the quality of observationalH(z)data.


Author(s):  
SUNG-WON KIM ◽  
YURI KANG

In this paper, we considered the multi-component accretion onto the black hole in the expanding universe. The accreted matters are dark energy, dark matter, and the interaction terms. We found the black hole mass change rates and their behaviors according to the models of interaction and dark energy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (21) ◽  
pp. 1444010
Author(s):  
Bruce H. J. McKellar ◽  
T. J. Goldman ◽  
G. J. Stephenson

If fermions interact with a scalar field, and there are many fermions present the scalar field may develop an expectation value and generate an effective mass for the fermions. This can lead to the formation of fermion clusters, which could be relevant for neutrino astrophysics and for dark matter astrophysics. Because this system may exhibit negative pressure, it also leads to a model of dark energy.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Mainini ◽  
Loris Colombo ◽  
Silvio Bonometto
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 568 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 8-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramzi R Khuri
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (08n10) ◽  
pp. 1397-1403
Author(s):  
L. MARASSI

Several independent cosmological tests have shown evidences that the energy density of the universe is dominated by a dark energy component, which causes the present accelerated expansion. The large scale structure formation can be used to probe dark energy models, and the mass function of dark matter haloes is one of the best statistical tools to perform this study. We present here a statistical analysis of mass functions of galaxies under a homogeneous dark energy model, proposed in the work of Percival (2005), using an observational flux-limited X-ray cluster survey, and CMB data from WMAP. We compare, in our analysis, the standard Press–Schechter (PS) approach (where a Gaussian distribution is used to describe the primordial density fluctuation field of the mass function), and the PL (power–law) mass function (where we apply a non-extensive q-statistical distribution to the primordial density field). We conclude that the PS mass function cannot explain at the same time the X-ray and the CMB data (even at 99% confidence level), and the PS best fit dark energy equation of state parameter is ω = -0.58, which is distant from the cosmological constant case. The PL mass function provides better fits to the HIFLUGCS X-ray galaxy data and the CMB data; we also note that the ω parameter is very sensible to modifications in the PL free parameter, q, suggesting that the PL mass function could be a powerful tool to constrain dark energy models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document