On Surface-Plasmon-Polariton Waves Excited in the Turbadar–Otto Configuration
Keyword(s):
AbstractA local minimum in the plot of linear reflectance versus angle of incidence, on its own, is insufficient to identify a surface-plasmon-polariton wave (SPPW). Further checks are required in order to confirm the identity of a SPPW. The wavenumber should be compared with that extracted from the dispersion relation for the corresponding canonical boundary-value problem. Also, for prism-coupled configurations such as the Turbadar–Otto configuration which are based on SPPW-excitation via evanescent waves, the angle of incidence should be greater than the critical angle needed for total internal reflection.
2012 ◽
Vol 190
◽
pp. 369-372
◽
Keyword(s):
2009 ◽
Vol 26
(7)
◽
pp. 1696
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
2018 ◽
Vol 35
(12)
◽
pp. 2957
◽