Classification of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on multi-phase CT scans

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 2497-2515
Author(s):  
Donlapark Ponnoprat ◽  
Papangkorn Inkeaw ◽  
Jeerayut Chaijaruwanich ◽  
Patrinee Traisathit ◽  
Patumrat Sripan ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 5505-5512
Author(s):  
SHUSEI SANO ◽  
YUSUKE YAMAMOTO ◽  
TEIICHI SUGIURA ◽  
YUKIYASU OKAMURA ◽  
TAKAAKI ITO ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. 41-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. I. Shchegolev ◽  
U. N. Tumanova ◽  
G. G. Karmazanovsky

New criteria for T, N and M categories and characteristics of the stages of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are presented in the eighth edition of the international TNM classification of malignant tumors in 2017. The differences of this classification from the previous seventh edition of 2009 are noted, due to the receipt of new data on the survival of patients. The main characteristics of the primary tumor remained its size, the number of nodes and the presence of vascular invasion.


1996 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 507
Author(s):  
Han Kyung Lee ◽  
Byung Ihn Choi ◽  
Joon Koo Han ◽  
Dae Young Yoon ◽  
Jae Min Cho ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuqun Wei ◽  
Qizhen Huang ◽  
Yang Zhou ◽  
Liuping Luo ◽  
Yongyi Zeng

Abstract Background Repeat hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are widely used to treat early recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) located in the subcapsular region, but the optimal treatment strategy remains to be controversial. Methods A total of 126 RHCC patients in the subcapsular location after initial radical hepatectomy were included in this study between Dec 2014 and Jan 2018. These patients were divided into the RFA group (46 cases) and the repeat hepatectomy group (80 cases). The primary endpoints include repeat recurrence-free survival (rRFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was complications. The propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to minimize the bias. Complications were evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo classification, and severe complications were defined as classification of complications of ≥grade 3. Results There were no significant differences in the incidence of severe complications were observed between RFA group and repeat hepatectomy group in rRFS and OS both before (1-, 2-, and 3-year rRFS rates were 65.2%, 47.5%, and 33.3% vs 72.5%, 51.2%, and 39.2%, respectively, P = 0.48; 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 93.5%, 80.2%, and 67.9% vs 93.7%, 75.8%, and 64.2%, respectively, P = 0.92) and after PSM (1-, 2-, and 3-year rRFS rates were 68.6%, 51.0%, and 34.0% vs 71.4%, 42.9%, and 32.3%, respectively, P = 0.78; 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 94.3%, 82.9%, and 71.4% vs 88.6%, 73.8%, and 59.0%, respectively, P = 0.36). Moreover, no significant differences in the incidence of severe complications were observed between the RFA group and repeat hepatectomy group. Conclusion Both repeat hepatectomy and RFA are shown to be effective and safe for the treatment of RHCC located in the subcapsular region.


Author(s):  
Yanling Chen ◽  
Wenping Wang

AIM: To explore the diagnostic ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in differentiating ICC from HCC. The diagnostic ability of CEUS was assessed based on the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The methodologic quality was assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression and investigation of publication bias were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of eight studies were included, consisting of 1,116 patients with HCC and 529 with ICC. The general diagnostic performance of CEUS in distinguishing ICC and HCC were as follows: pooled sensitivity, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84–0.96); pooled specificity, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79–0.92); pooled PLR, 7.1 (95% CI: 4.1–12.0); pooled NLR, 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05–0.19); pooled DOR, 76 (95% CI: 26–220) and AUC, 0.95(95% CI: 0.93–0.97). Different liver background may be a potential factor that influenced the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS according to the subgroup analysis, with the pooled DOR of 89.67 in the mixed liver background group and 46.87 in the cirrhosis group, respectively. Six informative CEUS features that may help differentiate HCC from ICC were extracted. The three CEUS features favoring HCC were arterial phase hyperenhancement(APHE), mild washout and late washout (>60s); the three CEUS favoring ICC were arterial rim enhancement, marked washout and early washout(<60s). No potential publication bias was observed. CONCLUSION: CEUS showed great diagnostic ability in differentiating ICC from HCC, which may be promising for noninvasive evaluation of these diseases.


2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 934-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Sapisochin ◽  
Nicholas Fidelman ◽  
John P. Roberts ◽  
Francis Y. Yao

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. 89-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang-Baek Kim ◽  
Chang Won Kim ◽  
Gwang Ha Kim

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 281
Author(s):  
Feres Chaddad-Neto ◽  
Marcos Devanir Silva da Costa ◽  
Bruno Santos ◽  
Ricardo Lourenco Caramanti ◽  
Bruno Lourenco Costa ◽  
...  

Background: Pneumatization of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) affects paraclinoid region surgery, this anatomical variation occurs in 6.6–27.7% of individuals, making its preoperative recognition essential given the need for correction based on the anatomy of the pneumatized process. This study was conducted to evaluate the reproducibility of an optic strut-based ACP pneumatization classification by presenting radiological examinations to a group of surgeons. Methods: Thirty cranial computer tomography (CT) scans performed from 2013 to 2014 were selected for analysis by neurosurgery residents and neurosurgeons. The evaluators received Google Forms with questionnaires on each scan, DICOM files to be manipulated in the Horos software for multiplanar reconstruction, and a collection of slides demonstrating the steps for classifying each type of ACP pneumatization. Interobserver agreement was calculated by the Fleiss kappa test. Results: Thirty CT scans were analyzed by 37 evaluators, of whom 20 were neurosurgery residents and 17 were neurosurgeons. The overall reproducibility of the ACP pneumatization classification showed a Fleiss kappa index of 0.49 (95% confidence interval: 0.49–0.50). The interobserver agreement indices for the residents and neurosurgeons were 0.52 (0.51–0.53) and 0.49 (0.48–0.50), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.00001). Conclusion: The optic strut-based classification of ACP pneumatization showed acceptable concordance. Minor differences were observed in the agreement between the residents and neurosurgeons. These differences could be explained by the residents’ presumably higher familiarity with multiplanar reconstruction software.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document