The primary patency of drug-eluting balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty in hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula stenoses

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 700-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Burak Çildağ ◽  
Ömer Faruk Kutsi Köseoğlu ◽  
Hakan Akdam ◽  
Yavuz Yeniçerioğlu
Radiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 289 (1) ◽  
pp. 238-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farah Gillan Irani ◽  
Terence Kiat Beng Teo ◽  
Kiang Hiong Tay ◽  
Win Htet Yin ◽  
Hlaing Hlaing Win ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-80
Author(s):  
Nuray K Ay ◽  
Bekir Inan

Objectives This study aimed to examine the efficacy of the concomitant use of infrapopliteal drug-eluting balloon angioplasty and a medical treatment (iloprost) in the treatment of critical leg ischemia. Methods Eighty-seven patients that underwent infrapopliteal drug-eluting balloon angioplasty for critical leg ischemia were included in this retrospective study. For analyses, patients were allocated into one of the two groups: 55 patients that underwent drug-eluting balloon angioplasty alone (drug-eluting balloon Group), and 32 patients that received intravenous iloprost for one week after drug-eluting balloon (DEB-I Group). Demographic, perioperative and follow-up clinical data were extracted retrospectively and analyzed. Results Duration of hospitalization was significantly longer in the DEB-I group (9.7 vs. 3.1 days, p < 0.001); however, the two groups were similar in terms of other clinical outcomes including early postoperative mortality, and primary patency, wound healing, reintervention, mortality, and amputation rates at one year ( p > 0.05 for all). Primary patency was similar across groups. Wound healing occurred earlier in the DEB-I group when compared to drug-eluting balloon group, in the subgroup of patients with ischemic wound at baseline. Mean time to wound healing was 3.0 ± 0.6 and 4.4 ± 0.6 months in DEB-I and drug-eluting balloon groups, respectively ( p = 0.037). Conclusions Iloprost add-on treatment in patients undergoing drug-eluting balloon angioplasty for critical limb ischemia seems to have additional benefits, at least in terms of accelerated wound healing. Further large prospective studies are warranted.


Vascular ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 457-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berkan Ozpak ◽  
Sahin Bozok ◽  
Mustafa Cagdas Cayir

Objectives To evaluate 36-month outcomes of drug-eluting balloons in infrapopliteal (=below-the-knee) arterial segments, we made a prospective registry enrolling patients (Rutherford class 2 to 5, ankle–brachial index 0.4–0.7) who were revascularized with drug-eluting balloon from August 2011 to December 2014. Methods Three hundred and seven infrapopliteal arteries were revascularized only with drug-eluting balloon. Endpoints included target lesion revascularization, primary patency rate, and changes in ankle–brachial index and Rutherford class. Results Both ankle–brachial index improvement and Rutherford reduction were statistically significant (p < 0.001). At 36 months control, ankle–brachial index improvement was 59.3% (p = 0.032). The clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate was 28% at 36 months. Limb salvage was accomplished in 73.6% of the critical limb ischemia cases, and complete wound healing was detected in 67.8% of cases with Rutherford category 5. Overall, the 1-year primary patency rate was 32.5%. Conclusions Drug-eluting balloons have shown successful performance in infrapopliteal arteries in mid-term, and evidence regarding clinical effectiveness and safety supports drug-eluting balloon angioplasty as the first line therapy in this segment.


VASA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ira Lugenbiel ◽  
Michaela Grebner ◽  
Qianxing Zhou ◽  
Anna Strothmeyer ◽  
Britta Vogel ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: Treatment of calcified femoropopliteal lesions remains challenging, even in the era of drug-eluting balloon angioplasty. Lesion recoil and dissections after standard balloon angioplasty in calcific lesions often require subsequent stent implantation. Additionally, poor patency rates in calcified lesions despite the use of drug-eluting balloons may be due to the limited penetration depth of the antiproliferative drug in the presence of vascular calcium deposits. Therefore, preparation of calcified lesions with the AngioSculpt™ scoring balloon might be a valuable option either as a stand-alone treatment, followed by drug-eluting balloon angioplasty or prior to subsequent stent deployment. Patients and methods: In this retrospective, single centre registry, 124 calcified femoropopliteal lesions were treated in 101 subsequent patients. All patients were treated with scoring balloon angioplasty, either alone, in combination with drug-eluting balloons, or prior to stent deployment. The primary outcome was safety and technical success during the index procedure as well as patency at six and 12 months, as evaluated by duplex sonography. Results: Successful scoring was safely performed in all 124 lesions with the AngioSculpt™ balloon. Overall primary patency after 12 months was 81.2 %. Patency rates did not differ significantly between the three treatment strategies. Degree of calcification did not predict patency. Improved clinical outcomes (Rutherford-Becker class and ankle-brachial index) were also observed in the study cohort. Conclusions: Preparation with the AngioSculpt™ scoring balloon offers a safe and valuable treatment option for calcified femoropopliteal lesions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document