Imaging of renal cell carcinoma in patients with acquired cystic disease of the kidney: comparison 11C-choline and FDG PET/CT with dynamic contrast-enhanced CT

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-177
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Kitajima ◽  
Shingo Yamamoto ◽  
Yusuke Kawanaka ◽  
Takayuki Katsuura ◽  
Masahiro Fujita ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1206-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Champion ◽  
Florence Lerebours ◽  
Pascal Cherel ◽  
Veronique Edeline ◽  
Anne-Laure Giraudet ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1198
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Le Goubey ◽  
Charline Lasnon ◽  
Ines Nakouri ◽  
Laure Césaire ◽  
Michel de Pontville ◽  
...  

Aim: To perform a comprehensive analysis of discordances between contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of the extra-cerebral treatment monitoring in patients with stage IV melanoma. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric observational study over a 3-year period in patients referred for 18F-FDG PET/CT and ceCT in the framework of therapy monitoring of immune checkpoint (ICIs) as of January 2017. Imaging reports were analyzed by two physicians in consensus. The anatomical site responsible for discordances, as well as induced changes in treatment were noted. Results: Eighty patients were included and 195 pairs of scans analyzed. Overall, discordances occurred in 65 cases (33%). Eighty percent of the discordances (52/65) were due to 18F-FDG PET/CT scans upstaging the patient. Amongst these discordances, 17/52 (33%) led to change in patient’s management, the most frequent being radiotherapy of a progressing site. ceCT represented 13/65 (20%) of discordances and induced changes in patients’ management in 2/13 cases (15%). The most frequent anatomical site involved was subcutaneous for 18F-FDG PET/CT findings and lung or liver for ceCT. Conclusions: Treatment monitoring with 18F-FDG PET/CT is more efficient than ceCT and has a greater impact in patient’s management.


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 472-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin E.G.W. ter Voert ◽  
Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven ◽  
Peter J.M. Kok ◽  
Wim J.G. Oyen ◽  
Eric P. Visser ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 1591-1596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aniek J. G. Even ◽  
Bart Reymen ◽  
Matthew D. La Fontaine ◽  
Marco Das ◽  
Arthur Jochems ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 157 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua K. Cho ◽  
Thomas J. Ow ◽  
Andrew Y. Lee ◽  
Richard V. Smith ◽  
Nicolas F. Schlecht ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document