scholarly journals Physical Examination Education in Graduate Medical Education—A Systematic Review of the Literature

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1090-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somnath Mookherjee ◽  
Lara Pheatt ◽  
Sumant R. Ranji ◽  
Calvin L. Chou
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 637-648
Author(s):  
Joseph F. Carrera ◽  
Connor C. Wang ◽  
William Clark ◽  
Andrew M. Southerland

ABSTRACT Background Graduate medical education (GME) has emphasized the assessment of trainee competencies and milestones; however, sufficient in-person assessment is often constrained. Using mobile hands-free devices, such as Google Glass (GG) for telemedicine, allows for remote supervision, education, and assessment of residents. Objective We reviewed available literature on the use of GG in GME in the clinical learning environment, its use for resident supervision and education, and its clinical utility and technical limitations. Methods We conducted a systematic review in accordance with 2009 PRISMA guidelines. Applicable studies were identified through a review of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases for articles published from January 2013 to August 2018. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles that reported using GG in GME and assessed the quality of the studies. A systematic review of these studies appraised the literature for descriptions of its utility in GME. Results Following our search and review process, 37 studies were included. The majority evaluated GG in surgical specialties (n = 23) for the purpose of surgical/procedural skills training or supervision. GG was predominantly used for video teleconferencing, and photo and video capture. Highlighted positive aspects of GG use included point-of-view broadcasting and capacity for 2-way communication. Most studies cited drawbacks that included suboptimal battery life and HIPAA concerns. Conclusions GG shows some promise as a device capable of enhancing GME. Studies evaluating GG in GME are limited by small sample sizes and few quantitative data. Overall experience with use of GG in GME is generally positive.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Keller ◽  
Dru Claar ◽  
Juliana Carvalho Ferreira ◽  
David C. Chu ◽  
Tanzib Hossain ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background Management of mechanical ventilation (MV) is an important and complex aspect of caring for critically ill patients. Management strategies and technical operation of the ventilator are key skills for physicians in training, as lack of expertise can lead to substantial patient harm. Objective We performed a narrative review of the literature describing MV education in graduate medical education (GME) and identified best practices for training and assessment methods. Methods We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar for English-language, peer-reviewed articles describing MV education and assessment. We included articles from 2000 through July 2018 pertaining to MV education or training in GME. Results Fifteen articles met inclusion criteria. Studies related to MV training in anesthesiology, emergency medicine, general surgery, and internal medicine residency programs, as well as subspecialty training in critical care medicine, pediatric critical care medicine, and pulmonary and critical care medicine. Nearly half of trainees assessed were dissatisfied with their MV education. Six studies evaluated educational interventions, all employing simulation as an educational strategy, although there was considerable heterogeneity in content. Most outcomes were assessed with multiple-choice knowledge testing; only 2 studies evaluated the care of actual patients after an educational intervention. Conclusions There is a paucity of information describing MV education in GME. The available literature demonstrates that trainees are generally dissatisfied with MV training. Best practices include establishing MV-specific learning objectives and incorporating simulation. Next research steps include developing competency standards and validity evidence for assessment tools that can be utilized across MV educational curricula.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 712-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Klein ◽  
◽  
Katherine A. Julian ◽  
Erin D. Snyder ◽  
Jennifer Koch ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sharhabeel Jwayyed ◽  
Kirk A Stiffler ◽  
Scott T Wilber ◽  
Alison Southern ◽  
John Weigand ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne L. Walsh ◽  
Susan Lehmann ◽  
Jeffrey Zabinski ◽  
Maria Truskey ◽  
Taylor Purvis ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Zimmerman ◽  
Richard Alweis ◽  
Alexandra Short ◽  
Tom Wasser ◽  
Anthony Donato

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document