scholarly journals A Multilevel Analysis of Patient Engagement and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Primary Care Practices of Accountable Care Organizations

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 640-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Shortell ◽  
Bing Ying Poon ◽  
Patricia P. Ramsay ◽  
Hector P. Rodriguez ◽  
Susan L. Ivey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Multilevel Analysis ◽  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Accountable Care Organizations ◽  
Accountable Care ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

scholarly journals 0489 Initial Results from the Hypertension with Unsatisfactory Sleep Health (HUSH) Clinical Trial for Primary Care Patients with Insomnia and Comorbid Hypertension (INS-HTN)

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A187-A188
Author(s):  
D J Buysse ◽  
L M Ritterband ◽  
J G Yabes ◽  
B L Rollman ◽  
P J Strollo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Sleep Disturbance ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Dissemination And Implementation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Primary Care Patients ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Abstract Introduction Insomnia is commonly comorbid with, and may contribute to, hypertension. Cognitive-behavioral treatments improve insomnia, but their effects on hypertension are uncertain, and they are often unavailable in primary care practices, where most INS-HTN patients are treated. We evaluated the efficacy of Brief Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia (BBTI) and Sleep Healthy Using the Internet (SHUTi) compared to enhanced usual care (EUC) on insomnia and home blood pressure (HBP) in primary care patients with INS-HTN. Methods Patients were recruited via electronic health records from 67 primary care practices and randomized 2:2:1 to BBTI delivered via telephone/videoconferencing; SHUTi, an automated, web-based CBT-I program; or EUC including a patient education video. Assessments included self-report questionnaires, home sleep apnea testing, and one week of sleep diary and HBP, measured at Baseline and 9 weeks/ 6 months post-treatment. The primary outcome was the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance scale. Linear mixed models were fitted for continuous variables on the intent-to-treat sample (n=548), adjusting for age and sex. Chi-square tests were used for proportions. Results Patients were 61.8±11.3 years old, 67.2% female, and 55.9% were taking hypnotics. Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was 15.4±4.4, Apnea-Hypopnea Index 9.8±11.4, and HBP 130±14/81±9. BBTI and SHUTi were significantly better than EUC (p≤.002) at 9 weeks and 6 months on PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment scales, ISI, and diary sleep efficiency, but had inconsistent effects on PROMIS depression and anxiety scales (p=0.001-0.9). Greater proportions of BBTI and SHUTi vs. EUC-treated patients had 9-week and 6-month ISI scores <8 (p=.01, p=.04) and ISI changes scores ≥7 (p=.002, p=.003). HBP did not significantly differ by intervention group. Conclusion BBTI and SHUTi improved insomnia, but did not reduce HBP in patients with INS-HTN. These interventions appear suitable for dissemination and implementation in primary care, but may have limited effects on comorbid symptoms and conditions. Support NHLBI UH2/UH3 HL125103

scholarly journals Implementation of cancer screening in rural primary care practices after joining an accountable care organisation: a multiple case study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e001326
Author(s):  
Heather Nelson-Brantley ◽  
Edward F Ellerbeck ◽  
Stacy McCrea-Robertson ◽  
Jennifer Brull ◽  
Jennifer Bacani McKenney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Multiple Case Study ◽  
Accountable Care ◽  
Rural Primary Care ◽  
Care Organisation ◽  
Multiple Case ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

ObjectiveTo describe common strategies and practice-specific barriers, adaptations and determinants of cancer screening implementation in eight rural primary care practices in the Midwestern United States after joining an accountable care organisation (ACO).DesignThis study used a multiple case study design. Purposive sampling was used to identify a diverse group of practices within the ACO. Data were collected from focus group interviews and workflow mapping. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide data collection and analysis. Data were cross-analysed by clinic and CFIR domains to identify common themes and practice-specific determinants of cancer screening implementation.SettingThe study included eight rural primary care practices, defined as Rural-Urban Continuum Codes 5–9, in one ACO in the Midwestern United States.ParticipantsProviders, staff and administrators who worked in the primary care practices participated in focus groups. 28 individuals participated including 10 physicians; one doctor of osteopathic medicine; three advanced practice registered nurses; eight registered nurses, quality assurance and licensed practical nurses; one medical assistant; one care coordination manager; and four administrators.ResultsWith integration into the ACO, practices adopted four new strategies to support cancer screening: care gap lists, huddle sheets, screening via annual wellness visits and information spread. Cross-case analysis revealed that all practices used both visit-based and population-based cancer screening strategies, although workflows varied widely across practices. Each of the four strategies was adapted for fit to the local context of the practice. Participants shared that joining the ACO provided a strong external incentive for increasing cancer screening rates. Two predominant determinants of cancer screening success at the clinic level were use of the electronic health record (EHR) and fully engaging nurses in the screening process.ConclusionsJoining an ACO can be a positive driver for increasing cancer screening practices in rural primary care practices. Characteristics of the practice can impact the success of ACO-related cancer screening efforts; engaging nurses to the fullest extent of their education and training and integrating cancer screening into the EHR can optimise the cancer screening workflow.

Enhancing the Safe and Effective Management of Chronic Pain in Accountable Care Organization Primary Care Practices in Kentucky

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selam Wubu ◽  
Laura Lee Hall ◽  
Paula Straub ◽  
Matthew J. Bair ◽  
Jill A. Marsteller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Accountable Care ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Chronic pain is a prevalent chronic condition with significant burden and economic impact in the United States. Chronic pain is particularly abundant in primary care, with an estimated 52% of chronic pain patients obtaining care from primary care physicians (PCPs). However, PCPs often lack adequate training and have limited time and resources to effectively manage chronic pain. Chronic pain management is complex in nature because of high co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders and other medical comorbidities in patients. This article describes a quality improvement initiative conducted by the American College of Physicians (ACP), in collaboration with the Kentucky ACP Chapter, and the Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, to enhance chronic pain management in 8 primary care practices participating in Accountable Care Organizations in Kentucky, with a goal of enhancing the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with chronic pain.

The Primary Care Obesity Network: Translating Expert Committee Guidelines on Childhood Obesity Into Practice

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 1069-1079
Author(s):  
Ihuoma U. Eneli ◽  
Candace Howell ◽  
Megan E. Rose ◽  
Keeley Pratt ◽  
Ericca L. Lovegrove ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Childhood Obesity ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Overweight And Obesity ◽  
Expert Committee ◽  
Accountable Care ◽  
Adolescent Overweight ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Implementation Resources ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Childhood obesity remains a serious public health threat. There is an urgent need for innovative, effective, and sustainable interventions for childhood obesity that are multisector, integrated, and pragmatic. Using the 2007 Expert Committee on the Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity as a guide, a tertiary care obesity program at a children’s hospital established the Primary Care Obesity Network (PCON). This article describes the structure, implementation, resources, and outcome measures of the PCON, a network of primary care practices and a tertiary care obesity center established to prevent and treat childhood obesity in Central Ohio. This program offers an opportunity to assess how and whether the expert committee guidelines can be translated into practice. As Accountable Care Organizations strive to provide services through the lens of improving population health, the PCON can serve as an example for addressing childhood obesity.

scholarly journals Associations of primary care structures with polypharmacy and patient-reported indicators in patients with complex multimorbidity: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan

BMJ Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e054348
Author(s):  
Takuya Aoki ◽  
Yasuki Fujinuma ◽  
Masato Matsushima
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Lower Prevalence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Community Orientation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

ObjectivesEvidence supporting the effects of primary care structures on the quality of care for patients with complex multimorbidity, which is one of the most important challenges facing primary care, is scarce internationally. This study aimed to examine the associations of the types of primary care facilities with polypharmacy and patient-reported indicators in patients with complex multimorbidity, with a focus on differences between community clinics and hospitals.DesignMulticentre cross-sectional study.SettingA total of 25 primary care facilities (19 community clinics and 6 small- and medium-sized hospitals).ParticipantsAdult outpatients with complex multimorbidity, which was defined as the co-occurrence of three or more chronic conditions affecting three or more different body systems within one person.Primary outcome measurePolypharmacy, the Patient-Reported Experience Measure using the Japanese version of Primary Care Assessment Tool Short Form (JPCAT-SF) and the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure using self-rated health status (SRH).ResultsData were analysed for 492 patients with complex multimorbidity. After adjustment for possible confounders and clustering within facilities, clinic-based primary care practices were significantly associated with a lower prevalence of polypharmacy, higher JPCAT-SF scores in coordination and community orientation, and a lower prevalence of poor or fair SRH compared with hospital-based primary care practices. In contrast, the JPCAT-SF score in first contact was significantly lower in clinic-based practices. The associations between the types of primary care facilities and JPCAT-SF scores in longitudinality and comprehensiveness were not statistically significant.ConclusionsClinic-based primary care practices were associated with a lower prevalence of polypharmacy, better patient experience of coordination and community orientation, and better SRH in patients with complex multimorbidity compared with hospital-based primary care practices. In the primary care setting, small and tight teams may improve the quality of care for patients with complex multimorbidity.

scholarly journals “They heard our voice!” patient engagement councils in community-based primary care practices: a participatory action research pilot study

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Haesebaert ◽  
Isabelle Samson ◽  
Hélène Lee-Gosselin ◽  
Sabrina Guay-Bélanger ◽  
Jean-François Proteau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Action Research ◽  
Participatory Action Research ◽  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Quebec City ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Advisory Councils ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Abstract Background Patient engagement could improve the quality of primary care practices. However, we know little about effective patient engagement strategies. We aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of embedding advisory councils of clinicians, managers, patients and caregivers to conduct patient-oriented quality improvement projects in primary care practices. Methods Using a participatory action research approach, we conducted our study in two non-academic primary care practices in Quebec City (Canada). Patient-experts (patients trained in research) were involved in study design, council recruitment and meeting facilitation. Advisory councils were each to include patients and/or caregivers, clinicians and managers. Over six meetings, councils would identify quality improvement priorities and plan projects accordingly. We assessed acceptability and feasibility of the councils using non-participant observations, audio-recordings and self-administered questionnaires. We used descriptive analyses, triangulated qualitative data and performed inductive thematic analysis. Results Between December 2017 and June 2018, two advisory councils were formed, each with 11 patients (36% male, mean age 53.8 years), a nurse and a manager practising as a family physician (25% male, mean age 45 years). The six meetings per practice occurred within the study period with a mean of eight patients per meeting. Councils worked on two projects each: the first council on a new information leaflet about clinic organization and operation, and on communications about local public health programs; the second on methods to further engage patients in the practice, and on improving the appointment scheduling system. Median patient satisfaction was 8/10, and 66.7% perceived councils had an impact on practice operations. They considered involvement of a manager, facilitation by patient-experts, and the fostering of mutual respect as key to this impact. Clinicians and managers liked having patients as facilitators and the respect among members. Limiting factors were difficulty focusing on a single feasible project and time constraints. Managers in both practices were committed to pursuing the councils post-study. Conclusion Our results indicated that embedding advisory councils of clinicians, managers, patients and caregivers to conduct patient-oriented quality improvement projects in primary care practices is both acceptable and feasible. Future research should assess its transferability to other clinical contexts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document