scholarly journals Association Between Opioid Dose Reduction Against Patients’ Wishes and Change in Pain Severity

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (S3) ◽  
pp. 910-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Frank ◽  
Evan Carey ◽  
Charlotte Nolan ◽  
Anne Hale ◽  
Sean Nugent ◽  
...  
Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed M Adil ◽  
Lefko T Charalambous ◽  
Kelly R Murphy ◽  
Shervin Rahimpour ◽  
Stephen C Harward ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Opioid misuse persists as a public health crisis affecting approximately one in four Americans.1 Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a neuromodulation strategy to treat chronic pain, with one goal being decreased opioid consumption. Accurate prognostication about SCS success is key in optimizing surgical decision making for both physicians and patients. Deep learning, using neural network models such as the multilayer perceptron (MLP), enables accurate prediction of non-linear patterns and has widespread applications in healthcare. METHODS The IBM MarketScan® (IBM) database was queried for all patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing SCS from January 2010 to December 2015. Patients were categorized into opioid dose groups as follows: No Use, ≤ 20 morphine milligram equivalents (MME), 20–50 MME, 50–90 MME, and >90 MME. We defined “opiate weaning” as moving into a lower opioid dose group (or remaining in the No Use group) during the 12 months following permanent SCS implantation. After pre-processing, there were 62 predictors spanning demographics, comorbidities, and pain medication history. We compared an MLP with four hidden layers to the LR model with L1 regularization. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 5-fold nested cross-validation. RESULTS Ultimately, 6,124 patients were included, of which 77% had used opioids for >90 days within the 1-year pre-SCS and 72% had used >5 types of medications during the 90 days prior to SCS. The mean age was 56 ± 13 years old. Collectively, 2,037 (33%) patients experienced opiate weaning. The AUC was 0.74 for the MLP and 0.73 for the LR model. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, we present the first use of deep learning to predict opioid weaning after SCS. Model performance was slightly better than regularized LR. Future efforts should focus on optimization of neural network architecture and hyperparameters to further improve model performance. Models should also be calibrated and externally validated on an independent dataset. Ultimately, such tools may assist both physicians and patients in predicting opioid dose reduction after SCS.


2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 2769-2779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert K Twillman ◽  
Nicole Hemmenway ◽  
Steven D Passik ◽  
Christy A Thompson ◽  
Michael Shrum ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (S3) ◽  
pp. 935-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Mackey ◽  
Johanna Anderson ◽  
Donald Bourne ◽  
Emilie Chen ◽  
Kim Peterson

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan G. Kertesz ◽  
Ajay Manhapra ◽  
Adam J. Gordon

This manuscript describes the institutional and clinical considerations that apply to the question of whether to mandate opioid dose reduction in patients who have received opioids long-term. It describes how a calamitous rise in addiction and overdose involving opioids has both led to a clinical recalibration by healthcare providers, and to strong incentives favoring forcible opioid reduction by policy making agencies. Neither the 2016 Guideline issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention nor clinical evidence can justify or promote such policies as safe or effective.


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (S1) ◽  
pp. 105-106
Author(s):  
S. Hallvik ◽  
S. El Ibrahimi ◽  
K. Johnston ◽  
J. Gedes ◽  
G. Leichtling ◽  
...  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 2155-2165 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J DiBenedetto ◽  
Kelly M Wawrzyniak ◽  
Matthew Finkelman ◽  
Ronald J Kulich ◽  
Lucy Chen ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective. To determine the relationship between opioid dose change, pain severity, and function in patients with chronic pain. Design. Retrospective cohort study. Setting. Community interdisciplinary pain management practice. Subjects. A total of 778 patients with chronic pain prescribed opioids for three or more consecutive months between April 1, 2013, and March 1, 2015. Methods. Changes in opioid dose, pain severity rating, modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score, and opioid risk data were extracted from medical records and analyzed for associations. Results. Two hundred forty-three subjects (31.2%) had an overall dose decrease, 223 (28.7%) had a dose increase, and 312 (40.1%) had no significant change in dose (<20% change). There was a weak negative correlation between change in opioid dose and change in pain severity (r = –0.08, P = 0.04) but no association between change in disability scores and dose change (N = 526, P = 0.13). There was a weak positive correlation between change in pain severity rating and change in disability scores (r = 0.16, P < 0.001). Conclusions. The results suggest that escalating opioid doses may not necessarily result in clinically significant improvement of pain or disability. Similarly, significant opioid dose reductions may not necessarily result in worsened pain or disability. This exploratory investigation raised questions of possible subgroups of patients who might demonstrate improvement of pain and disability with opioid dose adjustments, and further research should prospectively explore this potential, given the limitations inherent in retrospective analyses. Prescribers should still consider reduction of opioid doses as recommended by current guidelines, in an effort to mitigate the potential risks associated with high-dose treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document