The HEART score with high-sensitive troponin T at presentation: ruling out patients with chest pain in the emergency room

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Santi ◽  
Gabriele Farina ◽  
Annagiulia Gramenzi ◽  
Franco Trevisani ◽  
Margherita Baccini ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P4051-P4051 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ali ◽  
M. J. Fokkert ◽  
R. J. Slingerland ◽  
R. Tolsma ◽  
M. Ishak ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 109 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 303
Author(s):  
M. Lebrun ◽  
D. Geadah ◽  
D. Gossard ◽  
P. Ross ◽  
G. Turcotte

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Six ◽  
B. E. Backus ◽  
J. C. Kelder

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S61-S62 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Andruchow ◽  
A. McRae ◽  
T. Abedin ◽  
D. Wang ◽  
G. Innes ◽  
...  

Introduction: The HEART score is a validated tool created to risk stratify emergency department (ED) chest pain patients using 5 simple criteria (History, ECG findings, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin). Several studies have demonstrated the superiority of HEART over other well known risk stratification tools in identifying low risk chest pain patients suitable for early discharge. All but one of these studies used conventional troponin assays, and most were conducted in European populations. This study aims to validate the HEART score using a high-sensitivity troponin T assay in a Canadian population. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at a single urban tertiary centre and regional percutaneous coronary intervention site in Calgary, Alberta. Patients were eligible for enrolment if they presented to the ED with chest pain, were age 25-years or older and required biomarker testing to rule out AMI at the discretion of the attending emergency physician. Patients were excluded if they had clear acute ischemic ECG changes, new arrhythmia or renal failure requiring hemodialysis. Clinical data were recorded by the emergency physician at the time of enrolment and outcomes were obtained from administrative data. High-sensitivity troponin-T (Roche Elecsys hs-cTnT) results were obtained in all patients at presentation. The primary outcome was AMI within 30-days of ED visit, the secondary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Results: A total of 984 ED patients with complete HEART scores were enrolled from August 2014 to September 2016. The 30-day incidence of AMI and MACE in the overall population was 3.3% and 20.6%, respectively. HEART scores were predictive of 30-day AMI incidence: low risk (0-3): 0.77% (95%CI 0.0-1.5%), moderate risk (4-6): 4.3% (95%CI 2.3-6.2%) and high risk (7-10): 12.2% (95%CI 5.5-19.0%). HEART scores also predicted 30-day MACE: low risk (0-3): 5.0% (95%CI 3.1-6.9%), moderate risk (4-6): 31.8% (95%CI 27.2-36.4%) and high-risk (7-10): 61.4% (95%CI 51.2-71.5%). More than half of patients, 522 (53.0%) could be identified as low risk based on the HEART score using a single troponin result. Conclusion: Using a single high-sensitivity troponin result collected at ED presentation, the HEART score can rapidly and effectively identify more than half of ED chest pain patients as low risk for 30-day AMI, but is less sensitive for 30-day MACE.


BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. e017259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marten Ras ◽  
Johannes B Reitsma ◽  
Arno W Hoes ◽  
Alfred Jacob Six ◽  
Judith M Poldervaart

ObjectiveThe HEART score can accurately stratify the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with chest pain. We investigated the frequency, circumstances and potential consequences of errors in its calculation.MethodsWe performed a secondary analysis of a stepped wedge trial of patients with chest pain presenting to nine Dutch emergency departments. We recalculated HEART scores for all patients by re-evaluating the elements age (A), risk factors (R) and troponin (T) and compared these new scores with those given by physicians in daily practice. We investigated which circumstances increased the probability of incorrect scoring and explored the potential consequences.ResultsThe HEART score was incorrectly scored in 266 out of 1752 patients (15.2%; 95% CI 13.5% to 16.9%). Most errors occurred in the R (‘Risk factors’) element (61%). Time of admission, and patient’s age or gender did not contribute to errors, but more errors were made in patients with higher scores. In 102 patients (5.8%, 95% CI 4.7% to 6.9%) the incorrect HEART score resulted in incorrect risk categorisation (too low or too high). Patients with an incorrectly calculated HEART score had a higher risk of MACE (OR 1.85; 95% CI 1.37 to 2.50), which was largely related to more errors being made in patients with higher HEART scores.ConclusionsOur results show that the HEART score was incorrectly calculated in 15% of patients, leading to inappropriate risk categorisation in 5.8% which may have led to suboptimal clinical decision-making and management. Actions should be taken to improve the score’s use in daily practice.


2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dina Melki ◽  
Suzanne Lind ◽  
Stefan Agewall ◽  
Tomas Jernberg

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. S2-S3
Author(s):  
R.S. Engineer ◽  
B.W. Marshall ◽  
J.T. Milk ◽  
E.L. Simon ◽  
C.M. Smalley ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maycel Ishak ◽  
Danish Ali ◽  
Marion J Fokkert ◽  
Robbert J Slingerland ◽  
Rudolf T Tolsma ◽  
...  

Background: The first study of the FamouS Triage project investigates the feasibility of ruling out a myocardial infarction in pre-hospital chest pain patients without electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation by using the modified HEART score at the patient’s home, incorporating only a single highly sensitive troponin T measurement. Methods: A venous blood sample was drawn in the ambulance from 1127 consecutive chest pain patients for measurement of the pre-hospital highly sensitive troponin T levels, in order to establish a pre-hospital HEART score (i.e. the modified HEART score) and evaluate the possibility of triage at the patient’s home. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) i.e. acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or death within 30 days after initial presentation. Results: Two hundred and six patients (18%) developed a MACE during 30 days of follow-up. Thirty-six per cent of the patients ( n=403) had a low modified HEART score (0–3 points) and none of them developed a MACE during follow-up. Forty-four per cent of the patients ( n=494) had an intermediate modified HEART score (4–6 points) and 18% of them developed a MACE. Twenty per cent of the patients ( n=230) had a high modified HEART score (7–10 points) of which 52% developed a MACE during follow-up. Conclusion: It seems feasible to rule out a myocardial infarction at home in chest pain patients without ST-segment elevation by using the modified HEART score. TRIAL ID: NTR4205. Dutch Trial Register [ http://www.trialregister.nl ]: trial number 4205.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 956-956
Author(s):  
M. R. Mouridsen ◽  
O. W. Nielsen ◽  
O. D. Pedersen ◽  
C. M. Carlsen ◽  
T. Intzilakis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document