Carotid Baroreceptor Activation for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension and Heart Failure

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Doumas ◽  
Charles Faselis ◽  
Costas Tsioufis ◽  
Vasilios Papademetriou
F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Doumas ◽  
Konstantinos P Imprialos ◽  
Manolis S Kallistratos ◽  
Athanasios J Manolis

The management of resistant hypertension presents several challenges in everyday clinical practice. During the past few years, several studies have been performed to identify efficient and safe pharmacological and non-pharmacological options for the management of such patients. The Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2) trial demonstrated significant benefits with the use of spinorolactone as a fourth-line drug for the treatment of resistant hypertension over doxazosin and bisoprolol. In addition, recent data support that spironolactone may demonstrate superiority over central acting drugs in such patients, as well. Based on the European guidelines, spironolactone is recommended as the fourth-line drug option, followed by amiloride, other diuretics, doxazosin, bisoprolol or clonidine.  Among several device-based approaches, renal sympathetic denervation had fallen into hibernation after the disappointing results of the Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension (SYMPLICITY HTN) 3 trial. However, the technique re-emerged at the epicenter of the clinical and research interest after the favorable results of three sham-controlled studies, which facilitated novel catheters and techniques to perform the denervation. Significant results of iliac anastomosis on blood pressure levels have also been demonstrated. Nevertheless, the technique-related adverse events resulted in withdrawal of this interventional approach. Last, the sympatholytic properties of the carotid baroreceptor activation therapy were associated with significant blood pressure reductions in patients with resistant hypertension, which need to be verified in larger controlled trials. Currently device-based approaches are recommended only in the setting of clinical trials until more safety and efficacy data become available.


2016 ◽  
Vol 105 (10) ◽  
pp. 838-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoardo Gronda ◽  
GianMaria Brambilla ◽  
Gino Seravalle ◽  
Alessandro Maloberti ◽  
Matteo Cairo ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P4303-P4303
Author(s):  
C. N. Jin ◽  
A. P. W. Lee ◽  
M. Liu ◽  
F. Fang ◽  
C. M. Yu

Hypertension ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilad M Jaffe ◽  
Gomathi Krishnan ◽  
Margaret Stedman ◽  
Glenn M Chertow ◽  
John T Leppert ◽  
...  

Resistant hypertension is a common clinical condition associated with higher rates of cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, and death. Among individuals with resistant hypertension, secondary causes of hypertension occur in about 20% of cases, but the rates of screening are unknown. We assessed the practice pattern of these guidelines in a major primary and tertiary care academic institution in Northern California. Using the electronic health record, we identified individuals between the years of 2008 and 2014 who were prescribed three separate classes of antihypertensive agents and had follow-up laboratory data within 24 months. We excluded individuals with known causes of secondary hypertension such as hyperaldosteronism, renal artery stenosis, fibromuscular dysplasia, adrenal disease, and end-stage renal disease. We also excluded individuals with diagnosed heart failure, who may have been prescribed selected medications for heart failure instead of hypertension. This cohort of 37,073 individuals with presumed resistant hypertension had a mean age of 58.5 years (SD 15.8), was 51.7% male, and 56.4% Caucasian, 6.3% Black, and 12.4% Asian. Among these individuals, only 520 had a serum aldosterone, and only 447 had both aldosterone and plasma renin activity levels measured. These data infer that the recommended initial screening tests for secondary causes of resistant hypertension - notably primary and secondary hyperaldosteronism - are conducted in only 1.2% of individuals. A detailed chart review of a representative sample of this cohort will be also be conducted. Thus far, these data suggest that there is significant under-screening of reversible causes of resistant hypertension. Furthermore, an electronic implementation strategy to prompt screening for secondary causes may be warranted to reduce blood pressure, optimize use of antihypertensive medications, and lower cardiovascular risk. A similar analysis will be performed in the Veterans Affairs database to evaluate screening rates in health-care delivery systems enriched with African Americans.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document