Prevention of Recurrent Thrombosis in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Different from the General Population?

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Janet Legault ◽  
Amaia Ugarte ◽  
Mark Andrew Crowther ◽  
Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza
Lupus ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1340-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Sopeña ◽  
MT Pérez-Rodríguez ◽  
A. Rivera ◽  
JA Ortiz-Rey ◽  
J. Lamas ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 136 (6) ◽  
pp. 1174-1178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina da Silva Saraiva ◽  
Isadora Fernandes Custódio ◽  
Bruna de Moraes Mazetto ◽  
Marina Pereira Collela ◽  
Erich Vinícius de Paula ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (04) ◽  
pp. 321-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjlee Mahajan ◽  
Ann Brunson ◽  
Richard White ◽  
Ted Wun

AbstractThe incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is known to be higher in patients with malignancy as compared with the general population. It is important to understand and review the epidemiology of VTE in cancer patients because it has implications regarding treatment and prognosis. Multiple studies have shown that cancer patients who develop VTE are at higher risk for mortality. This article will focus on an update regarding the epidemiology of cancer-associated thrombosis (CT). The authors will describe factors associated with CT risk including cancer type and stage at the time of diagnosis, race and ethnicity, and cancer-directed therapy. In addition, recurrent thrombosis and the effect of thromboembolism on survival in cancer patients will also be addressed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. S163
Author(s):  
Harberth Fernandez ◽  
Nuria Bermejo Vega ◽  
Carolina Martin Aguilera ◽  
Fernando Carnicero ◽  
Fatima Ibañez Espacio ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 850-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Berkun ◽  
S. Padeh ◽  
J. Barash ◽  
Y. Uziel ◽  
L. Harel ◽  
...  

Hematology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (1) ◽  
pp. 675-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Lim

Abstract The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by venous or arterial thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in patients with persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Catastrophic APS is the most severe form of APS, which is associated with rapid development of microvascular thrombosis resulting in multiorgan failure in patients with aPLs. Patients with APS and catastrophic APS are recognized to have a high risk of recurrent thrombosis that can occur despite anticoagulant therapy. Although antithrombotic therapy remains the mainstay of treatment, bleeding manifestations can complicate management and contribute to increased morbidity. Patients with persistently elevated aPL levels, particularly those who exhibit positive testing for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, and anti-β2GPI antibodies (triple positivity), appear to be at increased risk for thrombosis and pregnancy complications, whereas isolated positivity for aPLs appears to be associated with low risk. Recognizing that patients with APS have different thrombotic risk profiles may assist clinicians in assessing the risks and benefits of anticoagulation. The optimal type, intensity, and duration of anticoagulation in the treatment of APS remain controversial, particularly for arterial thrombosis and recurrent thrombosis. Future studies that delineate thrombotic risk in APS and evaluate current and novel anticoagulants as well as nonanticoagulant therapies are required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document