Role of Surgical Resection in Low- and High-Grade Gliomas

Author(s):  
Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper ◽  
Mitchel S. Berger
Neurosurgery ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 79 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S24-S34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Lee ◽  
Steven Kalkanis ◽  
Constantinos G. Hadjipanayis

Abstract BACKGROUND: The value of maximal safe cytoreductive surgery in recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs) is gaining wider acceptance. However, patients may harbor recurrent tumors that may be difficult to access with open surgery. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is emerging as a technique for treating a variety of brain pathologies, including primary and metastatic tumors, radiation necrosis, and epilepsy. OBJECTIVE: To review the role of LITT in the treatment of recurrent HGGs, for which current treatments have limited efficacy, and to discuss the possible role of LITT in the disruption of the blood-brain barrier to increase delivery of chemotherapy locoregionally. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was performed to identify 17 articles potentially appropriate for review. Of these 17, 6 reported currently commercially available systems and as well as magnetic resonance thermometry to monitor the ablation and, thus, were thought to be most appropriate for this review. These studies were then reviewed for complications associated with LITT. Ablation volume, tumor coverage, and treatment times were also reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-four lesions in 63 patients with recurrent HGGs were treated with LITT. Frontal (n = 34), temporal (n = 14), and parietal (n = 16) were the most common locations. Permanent neurological deficits were seen in 7 patients (12%), vascular injuries occurred in 2 patients (3%), and wound infection was observed in 1 patient (2%). Ablation coverage of the lesions ranged from 78% to 100%. CONCLUSION: Although experience using LITT for recurrent HGGs is growing, current evidence is insufficient to offer a recommendation about its role in the treatment paradigm for recurrent HGGs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelia Razis ◽  
Vassiliki Kotoula ◽  
Georgia-Angeliki Koliou ◽  
Kyriaki Papadopoulou ◽  
Eleni Vrettou ◽  
...  

Sarcoma ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Al-Hussaini ◽  
D. Hogg ◽  
M. E. Blackstein ◽  
B. O'Sullivan ◽  
C. N. Catton ◽  
...  

Background. There remains controversy on the routine use of chemotherapy in localized SS.Methods. The records of 87 adult (AP) and 15 pediatric (PP) patients with localized SS diagnosed between 1986 and 2007 at 2 centres in Toronto were reviewed.Results. Median age for AP and PP was 37.6 (range 15–76) and 14 (range 0.4–18) years, respectively. 65 (64%) patients had large tumours (>5 cm). All patients underwent en bloc surgical resection resulting in 94 (92.2%) negative and 8 (7.8%) microscopically positive surgical margins. 72 (82.8%) AP and 8 (53%) PP received radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was administered to 12 (13.8%) AP and 13 (87%) PP. 10 AP and 5 PP were evaluable for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with response rate of10%and40%, respectively. 5-year EFS and OS was69.3±4.8%and80.3±4.3%, respectively, and was similar for AP and PP, In patients with tumors >5 cm, in whom chemotherapy might be considered most appropriate, relapse occurred in 9/19 (47%) with chemotherapy, compared to 17/46 (37%) In those without.Conclusions. Patients with localized SS have a good chance of cure with surgery and RT. Evidence for a well-defined role of chemotherapy to improve survival In localized SS remains elusive.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 1144-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eudocia Quant Lee ◽  
J Ricardo McFaline-Figueroa ◽  
Timothy F Cloughesy ◽  
Patrick Y Wen

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. ii64-ii64
Author(s):  
M. Riva ◽  
A. Comi ◽  
A. Casarotti ◽  
E. Fava ◽  
T. Alfiero ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document