Superiority of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT scan in detecting additional lesions compared to 18FDG PET/CT scan in breast cancer

Author(s):  
Umut Elboga ◽  
Ertan Sahin ◽  
Tulay Kus ◽  
Yusuf Burak Cayirli ◽  
Gokmen Aktas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A24-A24
Author(s):  
Georges Azzi ◽  
Shifra Krinshpun ◽  
Antony Tin ◽  
Allyson Malashevich ◽  
Meenakshi Malhotra ◽  
...  

BackgroundTriple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive form of breast cancer that is most difficult to treat due to the absence of hormone/growth factor receptors.1 2 Metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) is particularly challenging, given the limited efficacy and duration of response to chemotherapy.3 The repertoire of therapeutic options for mTNBC patients continues to increase with chemotherapeutic and immuno oncology based treatments and now includes sacituzumab govitecan, a novel antibody-chemotherapy conjugate.4MethodsHere we present a case study of a 40-year-old female who on biopsy of her left breast mass was diagnosed with TNBC. The patient underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with weekly administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by dose-dense doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide. Following one-month, the patient underwent bilateral mastectomy, showing pathological staging ypT2 pN0. The patient underwent periodic radiological imaging along with the assessment of circulating tumor DNA in blood using a personalized and tumor-informed multiplex PCR, next-generation sequencing assay (Signatera bespoke, mPCR NGS assay) to identify the minimal residual disease (MRD) and treatment response.ResultsAfter surgery, MRD assessment revealed ctDNA positive status (0.41 MTM/mL) prompting PET/CT scan that revealed liver metastasis. Continued ctDNA monitoring showed continuous increase in ctDNA concentration (287.09 MTM/mL). Separate analyses indicated MSI-high and PD-L1 positive tumor status, leading to the initiation of the first line of therapy (nab-paclitaxel and Atezolizumab), which resulted in ctDNA decline (39.62 MTM/ml). Weekly ctDNA monitoring noted a rapid increase a month later (178 MTM/ml to 833.69 MTM/ml) within a 2-week interval, which corresponded to disease progression on imaging. Given non-responsiveness with the first-line therapy, the patient was initiated with sacituzumab govitecan. Following this, a rapid decline in the ctDNA level was observed within a week (364.07 MTM/mL) with a downward trend to 73.03 MTM/ml by two weeks. An interval PET/CT scan showed a mixed response. Continued monitoring of ctDNA demonstrated ctDNA levels <5MTM/mL for a period of two months before serially rising again (to 89.27 MTM/ml). PET-CT ordered in response to increasing ctDNA levels confirmed progression involving hepatic and lung lesions. A new line of therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab was subsequently initiated.ConclusionsSerial monitoring of ctDNA enables early detection of therapy resistance and provides a rationale for treatment change/optimization/discontinuation as compared to periodic imaging that is currently the standard of care. The ease and convenience of using ctDNA-based testing as frequently as every week clearly identified earlier non-responsiveness to IO and also identified earlier acquired resistance to antibody-drug conjugate, enabling a prompt switch to alternative therapy.Ethics ApprovalN/AConsentN/AReferencesAnders C, Carey LA. Understanding and treating triple-negative breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2008;22(11):1233–1243.Mehanna J, Haddad FG, Eid R, Lambertini M, Kourie HR. Triple-negative breast cancer: current perspective on the evolving therapeutic landscape. Int J Womens Health2019;11:431–437. Published 2019 Jul 31. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S178349Treatment of Triple-negative Breast Cancer. American Cancer Society Website. Updated 2020. Accessed August 10, 2020. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/treatment/treatment-of-triple-negative.htmlBardia A, Mayer IA, Vahdat LT, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy in refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;380(8):741–751. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1814213


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 81 ◽  
Author(s):  
BhagwantRai Mittal ◽  
ChidambaramNatrajan Balasubramanian Harisankar ◽  
Kanhaiyalal Agrawal ◽  
Anish Bhattacharya

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-137
Author(s):  
M.A. Mahmoud ◽  
◽  
M. Shihab ◽  
SS. Saad ◽  
F. Elhussiny ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1042-1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahboobeh Karimi-Galougahi ◽  
Abbas Yousefi-Koma ◽  
Mehrdad Bakhshayeshkaram ◽  
Nasim Raad ◽  
Sara Haseli

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10533-10533 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Saad ◽  
S. Rikhye ◽  
A. Kanate ◽  
A. Sehbai ◽  
G. Marano ◽  
...  

10533 Background: Both tumor marker CA 27.29 and combined [18-F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan (PET/CT) are used to follow up response to treatment and disease progression in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Recently, circulating tumor cell testing (CTC) has been used in this context. It is not known if one of the three tests can be a surrogate for the other 2 tests. Methods: We analyzed the database of 35 patients with MBC. There were 173 time points (at least 6 weeks apart), when at least 2 of these tests were done. CA 27.29 test (chemiluminescent immunoassay by Bayer Advia Centaur) was either high or normal (< 38.6 U/ml). Circulating tumor cells cell test (Cell Search by Quest Diagnostics, Nichols Institute, Chantilly, VA) was either high or normal (0 cells detected). Results: PET/CT scan results were compared to CA 27.29 at 163 time points. There was statistically significant correlation between both groups (P value: 0.02), however, sensitivity of CA 27.29 to detect metastatic disease seen in PET/CT scan was 59%. The positive predictive value (PPV) of CA 27.29 was 90%, while the negative predictive value (NPV) was only 24%. PET/CT scan results were compared to CTC at 100 events, where there was statistically significant correlation between both groups (P value: 0.0002), however, sensitivity of CTC to detect metastatic disease shown in PET/CT scan was 55%. The positive predictive value of CTC was 98% while the negative predictive value was only 33%. CTC test was more specific (94% Vs 67%) than CA 27.29 to rule out metastatic disease that is seen in PET/CT scan. CA 27.29 results were also compared to CTC at 93 events, where there was statistically significant correlation between both groups (P value: 0.0002). However, only 64 % of those with high CA 27.29 had abnormal CTC. Conclusion: Our data shows correlation among PET/CT scan, CA 27.29, and CTC. However, both CA 27.29 and CTC had poor sensitivity and negative predictive value to detect metastatic disease seen in PET/CT scan. Normal CA 27.29 test or CTC has to be interpreted cautiously in patients with MBC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2015 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-66
Author(s):  
Francisco Javier García-Gómez ◽  
Irene Acevedo-Báñez ◽  
Rubén Martínez-Castillo ◽  
Manuel García-Gutiérrez ◽  
Juan Luis Tirado-Hospital ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document