Palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone for prevention of nausea and vomiting after high-dose melphalan in autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma: A phase II study

2016 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 478-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Isoda ◽  
Rie Saito ◽  
Fuminori Komatsu ◽  
Yuki Negishi ◽  
Noriyasu Oosawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

High-Dose Melphalan With Autotransplantation for Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Southwest Oncology Group Phase II Trial

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 2173-2173 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Vesole ◽  
John J. Crowley ◽  
Rose Catchatourian ◽  
Patrick J. Stiff ◽  
David B. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Southwest Oncology Group ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

PURPOSE: To evaluate high-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with refractory multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multiple myeloma patients with alkylating agent or vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone–refractory disease were eligible for the phase II multi-institutional Southwest Oncology Group trial S8993. Patients up to age 70 years were enrolled between April 15, 1991, and May 1, 1996. Patients without prior stem-cell collection were primed with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX; 6 g/m2) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. After stem-cell procurement, patients received melphalan 200 mg/m2 with autologous transplantation. Upon recovery from melphalan, patients were to receive interferon alfa-2b until relapse. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled onto S8993; five were ineligible and one received no therapy. Of the 66 assessable patients, 56 patients underwent the transplant procedure; 54 were assessable for response and 56 for toxicity. The response to HD-CTX (n = 37) included three complete remissions (CRs; 8%) and five partial remissions (PR; 14%); response to melphalan (n = 54) included 16 CRs (30%) and 19 PRs (35%), for an overall CR and ≥ PR (n = 66; intent-to-treat) of 27% and 58%, respectively. Toxicities included six treatment-related deaths: two during HD-CTX and four during transplantation. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) durations on an intent-to-treat basis from transplant registration was 11 months and 19 months (95% confidence interval, 14 to 29 months), respectively. The 3-year actuarial PFS and OS rates were 25% and 31%, respectively. CONCLUSION: High-dose therapy with melphalan 200 mg/m2 is feasible with high response rates (58% overall) and an OS of 19 months in patients with refractory multiple myeloma.

Aprepitant, Granisetron, and Dexamethasone for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting After High-Dose Melphalan in Autologous Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30) ◽  
pp. 3413-3420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Schmitt ◽  
Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽  
Kai Neben ◽  
Anja Freiberger ◽  
Johannes Hüsing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
End Point

Purpose The optimal regimen to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is unclear. To evaluate the effect of aprepitant in addition to a standard regimen, we conducted this randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Patients and Methods Patients with multiple myeloma were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to receive either aprepitant (125 mg orally on day 1 and 80 mg orally on days 2 to 4), granisetron (2 mg orally on days 1 to 4), and dexamethasone (4 mg orally on day 1 and 2 mg orally on days 2 to 3) or matching placebo, granisetron (2 mg orally on days 1 to 4), and dexamethasone (8 mg orally on day 1 and 4 mg orally on days 2 to 3). Melphalan 100 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on days 1 to 2. ASCT was performed on day 4. The primary end point (complete response) was defined as no emesis and no rescue therapy within 120 hours of melphalan administration. Quality of life was assessed by modified Functional Living Index–Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire on days −1 and 6. Results Overall, 362 patients were available for the efficacy analysis (181 in each treatment arm). Significantly more patients receiving aprepitant reached the primary end point (58% v 41%; odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% CI, 1.23 to 3.00; P = .0042). Absence of major nausea (94% v 88%; OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.09 to 5.15; P = .026) and emesis (78% v 65%; OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.18; P = .0036) within 120 hours was increased by aprepitant. Mean total FLIE score (± standard deviation) was 114 ± 18 for aprepitant and 106 ± 26 for placebo (P < .001). Conclusion The addition of aprepitant resulted in significantly less CINV and had a positive effect on quality of life.

Long-Term Results in Multiple Myeloma After High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Transplantation According to Response Categories in the Era of Old Drugs

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Martino ◽  
Maurizio Postorino ◽  
Giuseppe Alberto Gallo ◽  
Giuseppe Messina ◽  
Santo Neri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Melphalan ◽  
Old Drugs

How I Treat Frontline Transplant-eligible Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurore Perrot
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Adaptive Strategy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

High dose Melphalan supported by autologous transplantation is the standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Several randomized clinical trials have recently reaffirmed the strong position of transplant in the era of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs combinations, demonstrating a significant reduction of progression or death in comparison with strategies without transplant. Immunotherapy is currently changing the paradigm of multiple myeloma management and daratumumab is the first-in-class human monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 approved in the setting of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Quadruplets become the new standard in the transplantation programs, but outcomes remain heterogeneous with various response depth and duration. Otherwise, the development of sensitive and specific tools for disease prognostication allows to consider adaptive strategy to a dynamic risk. I discuss in this review the different available options for the treatment of transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients in frontline setting.

Inclusion of High-Dose Treosulfan Followed by Autologous Transplantation in the Tandem Transplantation for Patients with Multiple Myeloma <60 Years.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 5098-5098
Author(s):  
Albrecht Reichle ◽  
Nina Burgmayer ◽  
Ernst Holler ◽  
Anna Berand ◽  
Reinhard Andreesen
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ◽  
Intraindividual Comparison ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Blood Stem Cells ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract High-dose treosulfan followed by autologous transplantation is a tolerable and efficacious regimen in quite different tumor types. Aim of the present study was to proof safety and efficacy of high-dose treosulfan in an intraindividual comparison with melphalan. Between August 2003 and July 2006, 20 patients with multiple myeloma, age< 60 years were enrolled onto an unicentric phase II trial. The median age was 55 years. All patients received pretreatment with 3 to 4 cycles idarubicin and dexamethasone (90%) or CAD (10%). After induction the peripheral blood stem cells were mobilized with a combination of ifosfamide, epirubicin, etoposide (IEV) followed by G-CSF. Stem cell harvest was successful in all patients. Thereafter, the patients received tandem transplantation in an interval of 2 months, first after conditioning with high-dose treosulfan on day −4 to −2, 14g/m2 daily, then after high-dose melphalan 140 mg/m2. Maintenance therapy with interferon-alpha was administered in 30% of the cases. For all patients the completion rate of the first transplantation was 100%, for the second 85%. Three patients did not proceed to the second autologous transplantation due to a severe ischemic colitis (n= 1) or a high-risk profile (allogeneic transplantation in 2 cases). Two patients received an allogeneic transplantation during the further course of the disease. Overall the conditioning regimens were well tolerable. Hematotoxicity grade 4 was observed after each high-dose cycle. Grade 3/4 infections and stomatitis were present in 5%/5% after treosulfan and in 18%/6% after melphalan. An acute coronary heart syndrome occurred after Mel140. The duration of severe leukopenia (< 1.0 leukocytes) was significantly shorter after treosulfan (6.4 days vs. 7.9 days, p= 0.009), whereas time to leukocyte recovery did not significantly differ between the regimens. No treatment related deaths occurred. Best response after transplantation was CR 30%, PR 60%, NC 5%, and PD 5%. In comparison to the preceding chemotherapy a further >50% decline of the paraprotein was achieved by treosulfan in 3 cases, by melphalan in 2 cases. In the intraindividual comparison treosulfan and melphalan, respectively, have shown two times superior response. The median event-free survival was 28 months, and the overall survival at 4 years was 81%. In conclusion, high-dose treosulfan may be more favorable for patients at risk for infections than melphalan, and seems to be as efficacious as melphalan for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Treosulfan should be further investigated in multiple myeloma patients.

A Randomized Phase II Trial of High-Dose Melphalan, Ascorbic Acid and Arsenic Trioxide with or without Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2309-2309
Author(s):  
Manish Sharma ◽  
Peter Thall ◽  
Xuemei Wang ◽  
Chitra Hosing ◽  
Floralyn L Mendoza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Ascorbic Acid ◽  
Arsenic Trioxide ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Preparative Regimen ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Abstract 2309 Poster Board II-286 Background There is a role for novel preparative regimens in multiple myeloma to improve the outcome after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto HCT). Bortezomib is an active agent in newly diagnosed or relapsed multiple myeloma, and has synergistic activity with melphalan. We conducted a randomized phase II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of adding bortezomib to a preparative regimen of arsenic trioxide (ATO), ascorbic acid (AA) and melphalan. Methods auto HCT, with preparative regimen melphalan 100 mg/m2 IV on days -4 and -3, AA 1000 mg/day IV on days -9 to -3 and ATO 0.25 mg/kg IV on days -9 to -3. Patients were randomized to 3 arms; no bortezomib (arm 1), bortezomib 1 mg/m2 on days -9, -6 and -3(arm 2), and bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 on days -9, -6 and -3 (arm 3). Primary endpoints were complete response (CR), NCI grade 4 toxicity, and overall survival (OS). Results In arms 1, 2 and 3, median intervals between diagnosis and auto HCT were 12.2, 9.6 and 8.8 months; median follow up in all surviving patients was 20 months (range 10 to 31). CR+near CR rates in arms 1, 2 and 3 were 35%, 30% and 25%. Grade 3–4 toxicity was seen in 6 patients in arm 1 (mucositis 3, dyspnea 1, acute renal failure 1, pleural effusion 1), 6 patients in arm 2 (mucositis 3, diarrhea 1, pneumonia 1 and hydronephrosis 1) and 6 patients in arm 3 (pulmonary edema 2, mucositis 1, intestinal obstruction 1, low back pain 1, elevated transaminases 1). The most common adverse events were nausea, diarrhea and pedal edema. Grade 1–2 weight gain due to fluid retention was seen in 84%, 70% and 95% of patients in arms 1, 2 and 3. Median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC >500/dl) was 10 days in each arm. Median OS has not been reached in any of the 3 arms. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were18.6, 13.2 and 17.5 months. OS was significantly shorter in patients with relapsed disease (0.00001) and cytogenetic abnormalities at auto HCT (0.0002). Conclusions Adding bortezomib to a preparative regimen of ATO, AA and high dose melphalan is safe and well tolerated in patients with multiple myeloma. There was no significant impact of adding bortezomib at either dose on the CR rate, grade 3-4 toxicity or OS. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene, Amgen, Novartis, Elan: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Qazilbash:Cephalon: Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document