DSM Quality of Korean Satellite KOMPSAT-3 in Comparison to AW3D30 and Sentinel-1A in Respect of Airborne Laser Scanning

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 3162-3173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umut Gunes Sefercik ◽  
Gurcan Buyuksalih ◽  
Karsten Jacobsen ◽  
Serdar Bayburt
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 224
Author(s):  
Mihnea Cățeanu ◽  
Arcadie Ciubotaru

A digital model of the ground surface has many potential applications in forestry. Nowadays, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is one of the main sources for collecting morphological data. Point clouds obtained via laser scanning are used for modelling the ground surface by interpolation, a process which is affected by various errors. Using LiDAR data to collect ground surface data for forestry applications is a challenging scenario because the presence of forest vegetation will hinder the ability of laser pulses to reach the ground. The density of ground observations will be therefore reduced and not homogenous (as it is affected by the variations in canopy density). Furthermore, forest areas are generally present in mountainous areas, in which case the interpolation of the ground surface is more challenging. In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of interpolation accuracy for nine algorithms, which are used for generating Digital Terrain Models from Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data, in mountainous terrain covered by dense forest vegetation. For most of the algorithms we find a similar performance in terms of general accuracy, with RMSE values between 0.11 and 0.28 m (when model resolution is set to 0.5 m). Five of the algorithms (Natural Neighbour, Delauney Triangulation, Multilevel B-Spline, Thin-Plate Spline and Thin-Plate Spline by TIN) have vertical errors of less than 0.20 m for over 90 percent of validation points. Meanwhile, for most algorithms, major vertical errors (of over 1 m) are associated with less than 0.05 percent of validation points. Digital Terrain Model (DTM) resolution, ground slope and point cloud density influence the quality of the ground surface model, while for canopy density we find a less significant link with the quality of the interpolated DTMs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 168 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Menk ◽  
Luuk Dorren ◽  
Johannes Heinzel ◽  
Mauro Marty ◽  
Markus Huber

Evaluation of automated single-tree recognition from airborne laser scanning data In the present study, we investigated whether the detection tool FINT (Find Individual Trees) can identify single trees out of canopy height models (CHM) precisely enough to assess the protective effect of forests, even on steep slopes. For this purpose, reference trees were measured and described in twelve randomly selected sample plots in the Bündner Herrschaft and Schanfigg regions (Canton Graubünden, Switzerland). CHMs of different resolution and smoothing were generated from airborne laser scanning data for each sample plot and subsequently processed with FINT. In addition, we tested whether the use of a model that defines the minimum distance between a tree and its neighbours based on its height (MBA model) improved the quality of the results. The study showed that a finer-resolution CHM combined with stronger smoothing produced results comparable to those obtained with an unsmoothed and lower-resolution CHM. The smallest difference between the numbers of trees measured and detected was achieved with the 1-m resolution CHM, with no smoothing and no MBA model. In conclusion, FINT can provide a basis for assessing the protective effect of a forest with its existing structures, and its results – after evaluation in the field – can be directly integrated into natural hazard simulation models.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (14) ◽  
pp. 4744-4760 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Antonio Navarro ◽  
Alfredo Fernández-Landa ◽  
José Luis Tomé ◽  
María Luz Guillén-Climent ◽  
Juan Carlos Ojeda

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. F. Laefer ◽  
T. Hinks ◽  
H. Carr ◽  
L. Truong-Hong

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1917
Author(s):  
Alma Elizabeth Thuestad ◽  
Ole Risbøl ◽  
Jan Ingolf Kleppe ◽  
Stine Barlindhaug ◽  
Elin Rose Myrvoll

What can remote sensing contribute to archaeological surveying in subarctic and arctic landscapes? The pros and cons of remote sensing data vary as do areas of utilization and methodological approaches. We assessed the applicability of remote sensing for archaeological surveying of northern landscapes using airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) and satellite and aerial images to map archaeological features as a basis for (a) assessing the pros and cons of the different approaches and (b) assessing the potential detection rate of remote sensing. Interpretation of images and a LiDAR-based bare-earth digital terrain model (DTM) was based on visual analyses aided by processing and visualizing techniques. 368 features were identified in the aerial images, 437 in the satellite images and 1186 in the DTM. LiDAR yielded the better result, especially for hunting pits. Image data proved suitable for dwellings and settlement sites. Feature characteristics proved a key factor for detectability, both in LiDAR and image data. This study has shown that LiDAR and remote sensing image data are highly applicable for archaeological surveying in northern landscapes. It showed that a multi-sensor approach contributes to high detection rates. Our results have improved the inventory of archaeological sites in a non-destructive and minimally invasive manner.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document