Back-stepping Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Attitude Control of Aircraft Systems Based on Extended State Observer

Author(s):  
Huixuan Zhuang ◽  
Qinglin Sun ◽  
Zengqiang Chen ◽  
Xianyi Zeng
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 172988142093947
Author(s):  
Xing Li ◽  
Bingyou Liu ◽  
Lichao Wang

This study considers the problems of manipulators with high coupling, parameter uncertainties, and external disturbances. A six-axis serial manipulator control system based on active disturbance rejection control strategy is proposed without the requirement of the exact dynamic model. First, the operating circuit of the manipulator joint motor is analyzed, and the mathematical model of the direct-current torque motor is established. Second, the components of active disturbance rejection control are designed, and a new nonlinear function is selected to construct the extended state observer and nonlinear state error feedback control law. Then, Kalman filter is introduced into an extended state observer to estimate the disturbance efficiently. Finally, the proportion–integration–differentiation control, traditional active disturbance rejection control, and improved active disturbance rejection control are simulated and compared under the same input signal. The results show that the proposed control strategy has good dynamic performance and uncertain disturbance robustness, which proves the effectiveness of the proposed method.


Author(s):  
Wenjie Lou ◽  
Ming Zhu ◽  
Xiao Guo

In this paper, to address the spatial trajectory tracking problem of unmanned airships, a robust controller based on active disturbance rejection control is presented. By transforming the airship model to a standardized form, a straightforward design approach is adopted for the design of the controller. Active disturbance rejection control is composed of a tracking differentiator, an extended state observer, and a nonlinear state error feedback. The proposed controller replaces the conventional tracking differentiator with a third-order differentiator. The new tracking differentiator provides higher tracking precision and smoother transient process. The external disturbances and model uncertainties are observed by the extended state observer and compensated in the controller design, subsequently. Comparisons with technologies frequently used in the trajectory tracking are made through numerical simulation. The comparisons validate that the proposed controller provides satisfying performance and robustness in the presence of model uncertainty and external disturbance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document