Mechanical and leaching characteristics of red mud residue solidified/stabilized high Cu(II)-contaminated soil

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chongxian Suo ◽  
Xin Yao ◽  
Zhiwei Song ◽  
Xiaoqiang Dong
2021 ◽  
pp. 117178
Author(s):  
Fei Wang ◽  
Jian Xu ◽  
Hailong Yin ◽  
Yunhui Zhang ◽  
Hao Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Yulong Cui ◽  
Jiannan Chen ◽  
Yibo Zhang ◽  
Daoping Peng ◽  
Tao Huang ◽  
...  

This study analyzes the leaching behavior of elements from red mud (bauxite residue) at pH values ranging from 2 to 13. The leaching characteristics of metals and contaminated anions in five red mud samples produced by Bayer and combined processes were analyzed using the batch leaching technique following the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 1313. In addition, the geochemical model of MINTEQ 3.1 was used to identify the leaching mechanisms of metals. The results showed that Ca, Mg, and Ba follow the cationic leaching pattern. Al, As, and Cr show an amphoteric leaching pattern. The leaching of Cl− is unaffected by the pH. The maximum leaching concentration of the proprietary elements occurs under extremely acidic conditions (pH = 2), except for As. The leaching concentration of F− reaches 1.4–27.0 mg/L in natural pH conditions (i.e., no acid or base addition). At the same pH level, the leaching concentrations of Pb, As, Cr, and Cu are generally higher from red mud produced by the combined process than that those of red mud from the Bayer process. The leaching concentration of these elements is not strongly related to the total elemental concentration in the red mud. Geochemical modeling analysis indicates that the leaching of metal elements, including Al, Ca, Fe, Cr, Cu, Pb, Mg, Ba, and Mn, in red mud are controlled by solubility. The leaching of these elements depended on the dissolution/precipitation of their (hydr)oxides, carbonate, or sulfate solids.


2014 ◽  
Vol 675-677 ◽  
pp. 654-657
Author(s):  
Qiu Jun Li ◽  
Rui Jie Zhang ◽  
Ying Hui Wang ◽  
Da Rong Li

In this study we compared the efficiency of four kinds of amendments (silkworm excrement, coconut husk, red mud, sepiolite) and their mixtures to immobilize the heavy metals present in a contaminated acidic soil (Pb:420 mg ·kg−1; Zn :334 mg· kg−1) and to influence several enzymatic activities. The results showed that, silkworm excrement, coconut husk and their mixtures, which had high pH and/or high content of organic matter, reduced exchangeable Pb in the soil by 18% to 46%, and reduced available Zn by 24% to 35%, which was more efficacious than single sepiolite. The complex of silkworm excrement and red mud had a great influence on soil pH, while coconut husk increased the content of organic matter in soil significantly.


2017 ◽  
Vol 325 ◽  
pp. 17-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumei Hua ◽  
Kate V. Heal ◽  
Wolfgang Friesl-Hanl
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 200256-0
Author(s):  
Zhe Wang ◽  
Hangjun Zhu ◽  
Xuehui Wu ◽  
Binpin Wei ◽  
Hongli Zhou ◽  
...  

A semi-dynamic leaching test was used to simulate the erosion effect of acid rain on magnesium phosphate cement (MPC)-stabilized/solidified zinc-contaminated soil. The leaching characteristics and curing mechanism were studied with a combination of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Influences of the initial pH value of the simulated acid rain, the ratio of the curing agent (MgO/KH2PO4, abbreviated M/P), and the mass of water glass on the leaching characteristics of Zn<sup>2+</sup> and conductivity in the leachate of the sample were studied. It is shown that the curing effect of the cement component on Zn<sup>2+</sup> is better for M/P = 6 when compared to M/P = 4 in a strong acid environment. While in a weak acid environment, it is observed that the curing effect is superior when M/P = 4. Also it is observed that 4% water glass content can effectively improve the cement curing effect of heavy metal Zn in an acid rain environment. These results indicate that water glass can be effectively applied to MPC solidified heavy metal Zn.


2021 ◽  
Vol 821 (1) ◽  
pp. 012021
Author(s):  
Shuzhu Zhu ◽  
Ting Xu ◽  
Qiuqiu Li ◽  
XingYing Deng ◽  
Xiaoli Zhou ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upendra Singh ◽  
S. A. Thawrani ◽  
M. S. Ansari ◽  
S. P. Puttewar ◽  
A. Agnihotri

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 1616-1622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Ruyters ◽  
Jelle Mertens ◽  
Elvira Vassilieva ◽  
Boris Dehandschutter ◽  
André Poffijn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document