The Long-Term Effects of Mindfulness Added to Family Resilience-Oriented Couples Support Group on Psychological Well-Being and Cortisol Responses in Breast Cancer Survivors and Their Partners

Mindfulness ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1365-1376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei-Hsiu Hsiao ◽  
Guey-Mei Jow ◽  
Wen-Hung Kuo ◽  
Po-Sheng Yang ◽  
Hung-Bun Lam ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. e12984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuli Li ◽  
Yuanjing Qiao ◽  
Xiaorong Luan ◽  
Shaojie Li ◽  
Kefang Wang

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (14) ◽  
pp. 5927-5936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munir Abu-Helalah ◽  
Motasem Al-Hanaqta ◽  
Hussam Alshraideh ◽  
Nada Abdulbaqi ◽  
Jameel Hijazeen

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mojgan Firouzbakht ◽  
Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki ◽  
Dariush Moslemi

Abstract Background To explore and characterize the inter-relationship between psychological well-being, spirituality, social support, comorbidity, demographic and lifestyle factors and quality of life (QoL). Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted with 305 breast cancer survivors in northern Iran in 2017. The demographic and socio-economic data and physical activity were measured with a standard questionnaire. The standard European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 QoL scale, a system-of-belief inventory questionnaire, the social support scale, the short form of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the fatigue severity scale (FSS) were used in data collection. In structural equation modelling analysis, we used the maximum likelihood procedure to estimate the direct and indirect effects of relevant factors on QoL. Results The median age (quartile 1 [Q1], quartile 3 [Q3]) of patients was 50 y (43, 55). The psychological factors designated by anxiety, depression and FSS had a negative significant direct effect on QoL (β=−0.62). Spirituality has a positive direct effect (β=0.089) but a negligible indirect effect (β=0.020) on QoL, while the direct association of social support was almost negligible. Conclusions The findings emphasized the unifying structure of the determinants of QoL and the mediating negative association of psychological factors with QoL. Thus the supportive education efforts should focus on improving psychological well-being along with standard treatment in breast cancer survivors.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9045-9045
Author(s):  
P. K. H. Morrow ◽  
A. C. Broxson ◽  
M. Munsell ◽  
K. Basen-Engquist ◽  
C. K. Rosenblum ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei-Hsiu Hsiao ◽  
Guey-Mei Jow ◽  
Wen-Hung Kuo ◽  
King-Jen Chang ◽  
Yu-Fen Liu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. e98-e109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eden R. Brauer ◽  
Elisa F. Long ◽  
Joy Melnikow ◽  
Peter M. Ravdin ◽  
Patricia A. Ganz

PURPOSE: According to the Institute of Medicine, high-quality cancer care should include effective communication between clinicians and patients about the risks and benefits, expected response, and impact on quality of life of a recommended therapy. In the delivery of oncology care, the barriers to and facilitators of communication about potential long-term and late effects, post-treatment expectations, and transition to survivorship care have not been fully defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected qualitative data through semistructured interviews with medical oncologists and focus groups with breast cancer survivors and applied the Theoretical Domains Framework to systematically analyze and identify the factors that may influence oncologists’ communication with patients with breast cancer about the long-term and late effects of adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Eight key informant interviews with medical oncologists and two focus groups with breast cancer survivors provided data. Both oncologists and patients perceived information on long-term effects as valuable in terms of improved clinical communication but had concerns about the feasibility of inclusion before treatment. They described the current approaches to communication of therapy risks as a brief laundry list that emphasized acute adverse effects and minimized more long-term issues. We describe the barriers to communication about potential long-term effects from the perspectives of both groups. CONCLUSION: This study provides insight into oncologists’ communication with patients with breast cancer regarding the potential long-term and late effects of adjuvant chemotherapy and about setting realistic expectations for life after treatment. Opportunities to improve oncologists’ communication about the potential toxicities of therapy, particularly regarding long-term and late effects, should be examined further.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document