Make flying-fox hunting sustainable again: Comparing expected demographic effectiveness and hunters’ acceptance of more restrictive regulations

AMBIO ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malik Oedin ◽  
Fabrice Brescia ◽  
Eric Vidal ◽  
Alexandre Millon
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. e01504
Author(s):  
Vishal Chandr Jaunky ◽  
Jamiil Jeetoo ◽  
Jeffrey Michael Thomas

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Fouret ◽  
Frédéric G. Brunet ◽  
Martin Binet ◽  
Noémie Aurine ◽  
Francois Enchéry ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e103875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Zhou ◽  
Chris Cowled ◽  
Ashley Mansell ◽  
Paul Monaghan ◽  
Diane Green ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANJA DIVLJAN ◽  
KERRYN PARRY-JONES ◽  
GLENDA M. WARDLE
Keyword(s):  

Oryx ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail Entwistle ◽  
Nadia Corp

The Pemba flying fox Pteropus voeltzkowi is a fruit bat endemic to the island of Pemba, off Tanzania. A total of 41 reported roosting areas were visited in June and July 1995, and 19 occupied roosts were located, most of them in the west of the island, and on small islets off the west and south of Pemba. Roosts were situated in primary forest, secondary forest (overgrown clove plantations), traditional graveyards and mangrove areas. A range of sizes and species of trees were used as roosts. The minimum population of P. voeltzkowi was estimated to be between 4600 and 5500 individuals. In total 94 per cent of the population was located at 10 roost sites. Larger colonies were associated with roosts located in forests, which together supported 75 per cent of the total bat population. Colonies were of mixed sex, but no young or obviously pregnant females were observed. Major threats to this species appeared to be hunting and deforestation (both logging and clearing for agriculture) and P. voeltzkowi is considered to be endangered.


2014 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 83-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisca C. Almeida ◽  
Norberto P. Giannini ◽  
Nancy B. Simmons ◽  
Kristofer M. Helgen
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Matthew Mo ◽  
Mike Roache

Heat stress events in Australian flying-fox camps have resulted in significant numbers of flying-fox deaths. The frequency and intensity of such events have increased in recent decades, attributed to anthropogenic climate change. Evidence-based interventions are required to address this growing threat. Responders currently use different combinations of a range of intervention methods. We undertook a systematic review of heat stress interventions, which we classified as either ‘camp-scale’ or ‘individual-scale’. Camp-scale interventions included manual and automated misting of roost vegetation, whereas individual-scale interventions included spraying individual animals or removing them for intensive cooling and rehydration procedures. Our study showed that to date, evaluation of the efficacy of heat stress interventions has been largely anecdotal rather than empirical. This highlights the need for dedicated rigorous studies to evaluate the effectiveness of all the intervention methods described here. It will be especially important to understand the relationship between camp temperature and humidity levels and their influence on flying-foxes’ ability to regulate their body temperature, because high relative humidity reduces the ability of mammals to cool themselves using evaporative heat loss. The development of biophysiological measures such as temperature and humidity indices for different flying-fox species would enable meaningful interpretations of intervention trials under controlled conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document