scholarly journals Bioconversion of γ-aminobutyric acid and isoflavone contents during the fermentation of high-protein soy powder yogurt with Lactobacillus brevis

2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chung Eun Hwang ◽  
Md. Azizul Haque ◽  
Jin Hwan Lee ◽  
Yeong Hun Song ◽  
Hee Yul Lee ◽  
...  
2022 ◽  
Vol 2022 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Atefe Ghafurian Nasab ◽  
Sayed Ali Mortazavi ◽  
Farideh Tabatabaei Yazdi ◽  
Mahboobe Sarabi Jamab

In the present research, the production potential of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) using Lactobacillus brevis PML1 was investigated. In addition, the microorganism viability was examined in MAN, ROGOSA, and SHARPE (MRS) after undergoing high hydrostatic pressure at 100, 200, and 300 MPa for 5, 10, and 15 min. Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to optimize the production conditions of GABA as well as the bacteria viability. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that both the independent variables (pressure and time) significantly influenced the dependent ones (GABA and bacteria viability) ( P < 0.05 ). The optimum extraction conditions to maximize the production of GABA included the pressure of 300 MPa and the time of 15 min. The amount of the compound was quantified using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and spectrophotometry. For the process optimization, a central composite design (CCD) was created using Design Expert with 5 replications at the center point, whereby the highest content of GABA was obtained to be 397.73 ppm which was confirmed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Moreover, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was utilized to observe the morphological changes in the microorganism. The results revealed that not only did have Lactobacillus brevis PML1 the potential for the production of GABA under conventional conditions (control sample) but also the content of this bioactive compound could be elevated by optimizing the production parameters.


2019 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 114305
Author(s):  
Johannes Taubert ◽  
Stephanie Adolph ◽  
Rebecca Scherer ◽  
Karl-Heinz Südekum

LWT ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 110640
Author(s):  
Yi-Huang Hsueh ◽  
Jun-Huang Yang ◽  
Shih-Fu Ou ◽  
Shyi-Tien Chen ◽  
Jen-Min Kuo ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (22) ◽  
pp. 7283-7290 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Siragusa ◽  
M. De Angelis ◽  
R. Di Cagno ◽  
C. G. Rizzello ◽  
R. Coda ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The concentrations of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in 22 Italian cheese varieties that differ in several technological traits markedly varied from 0.26 to 391 mg kg−1. Presumptive lactic acid bacteria were isolated from each cheese variety (total of 440 isolates) and screened for the capacity to synthesize GABA. Only 61 isolates showed this activity and were identified by partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Twelve species were found. Lactobacillus paracasei PF6, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus PR1, Lactococcus lactis PU1, Lactobacillus plantarum C48, and Lactobacillus brevis PM17 were the best GABA-producing strains during fermentation of reconstituted skimmed milk. Except for L. plantarum C48, all these strains were isolated from cheeses with the highest concentrations of GABA. A core fragment of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) DNA was isolated from L. paracasei PF6, L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus PR1, L. lactis PU1, and L. plantarum C48 by using primers based on two highly conserved regions of GAD. A PCR product of ca. 540 bp was found for all the strains. The amino acid sequences deduced from nucleotide sequence analysis showed 98, 99, 90, and 85% identity to GadB of L. plantarum WCFS1 for L. paracasei PF6, L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus PR1, L. lactis PU1, and L. plantarum C48, respectively. Except for L. lactis PU1, the three lactobacillus strains survived and synthesized GABA under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. The findings of this study provide a potential basis for exploiting selected cheese-related lactobacilli to develop health-promoting dairy products enriched in GABA.


2009 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ja Young Kim ◽  
Moo Young Lee ◽  
Geun Eog Ji ◽  
Yeon Sook Lee ◽  
Keum Taek Hwang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document