scholarly journals Comparing Stroke and Bleeding with Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran in Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the US Medicare Part D Data

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inmaculada Hernandez ◽  
Yuting Zhang
2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Zimmer

Purpose – The US Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 introduced optional prescription drug coverage, beginning in 2006, widely known as Medicare Part D. This paper uses up-to-date nationally representative survey data to investigate the impact of Part D not only on drug spending and consumption, but also on the composition of drug consumption. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Specifically, the paper investigates whether Part D impacted the number of therapeutic classes for which drugs were prescribed, and also whether Part D lead to increased usage of drugs for specific medical conditions that typically receive drug-intensive therapies. Findings – In addition to confirming findings from previous studies, this paper shows that Part D increased the number of therapeutic classes to which seniors receive drugs by approximately four classes. Part D also lead to increased usage of drugs used to treat upper respiratory disease, hypertension, and diabetes. Originality/value – While mostly concurring with previous studies on the spending impacts of Part D, this paper is the first to shed light on other impacts of Part D, specifically with respect to its impact on therapeutic classes for which drugs are prescribed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukaila A Raji ◽  
Matthew Lowery ◽  
Yu-Li Lin ◽  
Yong-Fang Kuo ◽  
Jacques Baillargeon ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Although warfarin therapy reduces stroke incidence in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the rate of warfarin use in this population remains low. In 2008, the Medicare Part D program was expanded to pay for medications for Medicare enrollees. OBJECTIVE To examine rates and predictors of warfarin use in Medicare Part D beneficiaries with AF. METHODS This population-based retrospective cohort study used claims data from 41,447 Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 and older with at least 2 AF diagnoses in 2007 and at least 1 diagnosis in 2008. All subjects had continuous Medicare Part D prescription coverage in 2008. Statistical analysis using χ2 was used to examine differences in warfarin use by patient characteristics (age, ethnicity, sex, Medicaid eligibility, comorbidities, contraindications to warfarin, and whether they visited a cardiologist or a primary care physician [PCP]), CHADS2 score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, and stroke or transient ischemic attack; higher scores indicate higher risks of stroke), and geographic regions. Using hierarchical generalized linear models restricted to subjects without warfarin contraindications (n = 34,947), we examined the effect of patient characteristics and geographic regions on warfarin use. RESULTS The overall warfarin use rate was 66.8%. The warfarin use rates varied between hospital referral regions, with highest rates in the Midwestern states and lowest rates in the South. The regional variation persisted even after adjustment for patient characteristics. Multivariable analysis showed that the odds of being on warfarin decreased significantly with age and increasing comorbidity, in blacks, and among those with low income. Seeing a cardiologist (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.05–1.16), having a PCP (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.17–1.29), and CHADS2 score of 2 or greater (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.01–1.17) were associated with increased odds of warfarin use. CONCLUSIONS Warfarin use rates vary by patient characteristics and region, with higher rates among residents of the Midwest and among patients seen by cardiologists and PCPs. Preventing stroke-related disability in AF requires implementation of evidence-based initiatives to increase warfarin use.


2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (9) ◽  
pp. 350-359
Author(s):  
Michael Liu ◽  
Brian MacKenna ◽  
William B Feldman ◽  
Alex J Walker ◽  
Jerry Avorn ◽  
...  

Summary Objectives To estimate additional spending if NHS England paid the same prices as US Medicare Part D for the 50 single-source brand-name drugs with the highest expenditure in English primary care in 2018. Design Retrospective analysis of 2018 drug prescribing and spending in the NHS England prescribing data and the Medicare Part D Drug Spending Dashboard and Data. We examined the 50 costliest drugs in English primary care available as brand-name-only in the US and England. We performed cost projections of NHS England spending with US Medicare Part D prices. We estimated average 2018 US rebates as 1 minus the quotient of net divided by gross Medicare Part D spending. Setting England and US Participants NHS England and US Medicare systems Main outcome measures Total spending, prescriptions and claims in NHS England and Medicare Part D. All spending and cost measures were reported in 2018 British pounds. Results NHS England spent £1.39 billion on drugs in the cohort. All drugs were more expensive under US Medicare Part D than NHS England. The US–England price ratios ranged from 1.3 to 9.9 (mean ratio 4.8). Accounting for prescribing volume, if NHS England had paid US Medicare Part D prices after adjusting for estimated US rebates, it would have spent 4.6 times as much in 2018 on drugs in the cohort (£6.42 billion). Conclusions Spending by NHS England would be substantially higher if it paid US Medicare Part D prices. This could result in decreased access to medicines and other health services.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1994-1994
Author(s):  
John L Reagan ◽  
Thomas Ollila ◽  
Patrycja M Dubielecka ◽  
Adam J Olszewski

Abstract Background: Myelodysplastic syndrome with deletion 5q [del(5q) MDS] is characterized by higher incidence in older women, progressive anemia, and >70% rate of hematologic response to single-agent lenalidomide (Len). Len was approved for del(5q) MDS by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2005 on the basis of response rates, with uncertain effect on overall survival (OS). Our objective was to evaluate whether the availability of Len affected the frequency of del(5q) designation among newly diagnosed MDS cases in the US, and to compare OS of del(5q) MDS patients treated with upfront Len or with hypomethylating agents (HMA, azacitidine or decitabine), which were an alternative therapy for MDS available in the US. Methods: We selected cases of low-grade MDS diagnosed in 2001-2011 from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare (SEER-Medicare) data base. Patients were >65 years of age at diagnosis. We identified treatment with Len or HMA in the subpopulation of del(5q) cases diagnosed in 2007-2011 who had complete records of injectable and oral chemotherapy drugs (i.e. with Medicare Part D coverage). Transfusion dependence was assessed by identifying all transfusions within 3 months before therapy, and in months 1-2, 3-4, or 5-6 after treatment initiation. We compared overall survival (OS) using log-rank tests, and in multivariable Cox models adjusting for available confounders, reporting adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Among 21,384 low-grade MDS patients, the frequency of del(5q) MDS designation (N=655) doubled after approval of Len (2% in 2001-06 vs. 4% in 2007-11, P<.0001). Among del(5q) MDS patients with complete Medicare claims, those diagnosed in 2007-11 were slightly less likely to require transfusion at diagnosis compared with 2001-06 cases (73% vs. 82%, P=.056), and significantly more likely to receive chemotherapy (52% vs. 37%, P<.0001). There was no significant change in OS (from diagnosis) among del(5q) MDS patients between the two periods (P=.27), even after adjustment for age, socioeconomic factors, and baseline intensity of transfusions (adjusted HR, 0.96, CI, 0.77-1.19, P=.70). Median OS from diagnosis in del(5q) MDS was 2.3 years (CI, 2.0-2.6), not significantly different from other low-grade MDS (2.2 years, CI, 2.2-2.3, P=.09). OS at 3-years was 41% for del(5q) vs. 42% for other low-grade MDS. We compared outcomes of del(5q) MDS patients from 2007-2011 (N=157) who had complete record of oral prescriptions (i.e. enrollees in a Medicare Part D plan), including 114 patients treated with upfront Len and 43 treated with upfront HMA. Patients treated with Len were on average older (median age 81 years for Len vs. 78 for HMA, P=.007), more often female (75% vs. 51%, P=.007), with poor functional status (16% vs. 2%, P=.026) or with Medicaid co-insurance (24% vs. 9%, P=.046). There was no significant difference in time from diagnosis to treatment (median 3 months, P=.10), comorbidity index (P=.22), prior hospitalization (P=1.0) or prior transfusions (P=1.00). However, HMA-treated cases had a higher prevalence of pre-treatment G-CSF use (21% vs. 4%, P=.003) and more frequently a subsequent record of acute leukemia (12% vs. 2%, P=.017). OS was significantly better among patients treated with Len than with HMA (median 2.8 vs. 0.9 years, Fig. A), and remained so in a multivariable model adjusting for age, sex, race, baseline transfusion dependence, prior G-CSF, hospitalization, and poor functional status (adjusted HR, 0.27, CI, 0.16-0.43, P<.0001). Len was also associated with a significantly higher rate of transfusion independence within 6 months of therapy initiation (68% vs. 30%, P=.00002, Fig. B). Conclusions:In this first population-based assessment of survival outcomes among US patients with del(5q) MDS, the FDA approval of Len led to an increased designation of del(5q) among MDS cases, which will confound studies relying on historical cohort comparisons. Rates of transfusion independence after Len in del(5q) MDS were similar to experience from clinical trials. A significant proportion of del(5q) MDS patients do not receive Len, and state-subsidized co-insurance was associated with improved access to this expensive drug. Among del(5q) MDS patients who receive active therapy, upfront Len is associated with a significantly better OS and a higher rate of transfusion independence than upfront HMA. Figure Figure. Disclosures Reagan: Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Honoraria. Olszewski:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document